- Joined
- Oct 3, 2008
- Messages
- 12,753
- Reaction score
- 2,321
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Bman,
Read the words...
Urban areas completely levelled This DID NOT HAPPEN within the structure. DID NOT. Fact. = NO NUKE
Lethal total dose (neutrons and gamma rays) This DID NOT HAPPEN within the structure or external to the structure. DID NOT. Fact. = NO NUKE
Conflagration - This DID NOT HAPPEN within the structure or external to the structure. DID NOT. Fact. = NO NUKE
Not to mention the NON-EXISTANT EMP = NO NUKE
Not to mention the NON-EXISTANT FALLOUT = NO NUKE
No plausible argument can be made for nukes in the WTC.
Read the effects....
The effects that DID NOT HAPPEN.
On ANY scale.
DID NOT HAPPEN.
What part of DID NOT HAPPEN does not compute?
DID NOT HAPPEN.
As in DID NOT HAPPEN.
Ok, I'll tell you this one last time:
In that scale, even if it DID happen, it would have gone effectively unnoticed, because anyone that would have been close enough to those effects would have been killed by it, and we know that the body parts that were found were more or less shredded.
Urban areas levelled... The tower was levelled within 20 sq meters, from the area the collapse started. 50 meters away and you are just outside the building. 80 meters (the dose of radiation) dosed the other building and would have dissipated long before the 150 or so meters to the ground.
But there was radiation detected...
Then, given how there was a search only to prove that fire collapsed the buildings, again it's on faith your position.
The huge cancer cluster is typically attributed to the concrete dust and asbestos, but who knows for sure if that's the whole story.
That said, that's not what I actually believe happened, just that to say that's not what happened is not as cut and dry as you are trying to suggest.