• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Kennedy[W:480]

I could only be a liar if you can prove a rear headshot. YOU HAVE NO CHANCE.

They know they have no chance. Haven't you figured out DP yet? When people see a video of the driver of a limo shooting his rear passenger, then say that's not what it shows, it's not because they're brain dead or blind. It's because they are only there for that reason. They work in teams because individually, I'll shred them like hashbrowns in a matter of seconds. I don't post here anymore. I came back and posted this only to be reminded why...

I estimate that there are maybe 2 to 3 genuine posters for every dozen here on DP. If it has anything to do with conspiracies or jews, they'll be there like flies on sht. You can post videos in HD of Bush blowing Cheney and they'll just say no it's not. They use the Mr. Magoo tactic and pretend to be unaware that you've just posted all the "proof" they had requested. Other used-up tactics include the "it's out of context" when paraphrasing, and the ages-old "any website that contains information contrary to whatever falsehood they are promoting... is not valid". "Truther" sites that are known for disseminating the truth....those are also no good. When they've used them all up, it's just flat-out unsupported denial. They are pathetic like Gollum because they'll continue even after you've just made them look soooo ridiculously dumb.

I've schooled them all so royally. I've engaged them as far as it will go - whereby then it's just the denial, refusing to discuss in further detail the glaring evidence I've posted, and, at the same time refusing to EVER post something in support of their denial. Over and over and over. And all the while DP just stands by watching, removing me from the thread first chance they get. Never mind the 9 idiots I've thoroughly exposed (well, really they've exposed themselves) as paid shills. It is this negligence that has led me to believe that DP itself was purposely set up this way. A genuine debate site would ban these morons once it became more than obvious that they were only there to poison the forum, spinning the threads in circles. It's counterproductive to the forum. If DP were legit, they wouldn't allow such blatant juvenile absurdity.

Look at the profiles of some of them and you'll find they spend around 8 hours a day posting - roughly about a day's work. You'd think that those who pay them would hire some good master bullshtters, but they settle for shills with no skills. They're no match for the "master of argument". I win EVERY time. Wanna know what the trick is? It's so simple. You just have to be on the right side of the argument.
 
They know they have no chance. Haven't you figured out DP yet? When people see a video of the driver of a limo shooting his rear passenger, then say that's not what it shows, it's not because they're brain dead or blind. It's because they are only there for that reason. They work in teams because individually, I'll shred them like hashbrowns in a matter of seconds. I don't post here anymore. I came back and posted this only to be reminded why...

I estimate that there are maybe 2 to 3 genuine posters for every dozen here on DP. If it has anything to do with conspiracies or jews, they'll be there like flies on sht. You can post videos in HD of Bush blowing Cheney and they'll just say no it's not. They use the Mr. Magoo tactic and pretend to be unaware that you've just posted all the "proof" they had requested. Other used-up tactics include the "it's out of context" when paraphrasing, and the ages-old "any website that contains information contrary to whatever falsehood they are promoting... is not valid". "Truther" sites that are known for disseminating the truth....those are also no good. When they've used them all up, it's just flat-out unsupported denial. They are pathetic like Gollum because they'll continue even after you've just made them look soooo ridiculously dumb.

I've schooled them all so royally. I've engaged them as far as it will go - whereby then it's just the denial, refusing to discuss in further detail the glaring evidence I've posted, and, at the same time refusing to EVER post something in support of their denial. Over and over and over. And all the while DP just stands by watching, removing me from the thread first chance they get. Never mind the 9 idiots I've thoroughly exposed (well, really they've exposed themselves) as paid shills. It is this negligence that has led me to believe that DP itself was purposely set up this way. A genuine debate site would ban these morons once it became more than obvious that they were only there to poison the forum, spinning the threads in circles. It's counterproductive to the forum. If DP were legit, they wouldn't allow such blatant juvenile absurdity.

Look at the profiles of some of them and you'll find they spend around 8 hours a day posting - roughly about a day's work. You'd think that those who pay them would hire some good master bullshtters, but they settle for shills with no skills. They're no match for the "master of argument". I win EVERY time. Wanna know what the trick is? It's so simple. You just have to be on the right side of the argument.

The bolded is ignorant garbage....
 
Skitzo,

Have you ever considered coming up with an INTELLIGENT theory we could discuss?

No?

Because the "driver shot Kennedy" is one of the craziest claims to be written...
 
Last edited:
Skitzo,

Have you ever considered coming up with an INTELLIGENT theory we could discuss?

No?

Because the "driver shot Kennedy" is one of the craziest claims to be written...

Haven't you humiliated yourself enough? I took you off ignore to read this post. You are not capable of discussion. That much has been thoroughly demonstrated. You are such a prime example, though, of everything I mentioned above, that before I put you back on ignore, I want to ask if there is anybody who would like to see prime examples of what I was saying....or maybe you think I was exaggerating, I'd be happy to post the last "discussion" between myself and Fledermouse....anyone?
 
“Following Oswald’s apprehension on November 22, 1963, Dr. W.F. Mason of Dallas concluded, after tests, that paraffin casts made of Oswald’s hands contained traces of nitrate consistent with the residue on the hands of a person who had recently handled or fired a firearm."
chapter4d:castsofcontention - www2

Wrong parrifin tests prove he didn't fire a rifle. A gun, maybe a rifle no. I say maybe because the residue could be leftover on the gun and we all know he handled a gun
 
They know they have no chance. Haven't you figured out DP yet? When people see a video of the driver of a limo shooting his rear passenger, then say that's not what it shows, it's not because they're brain dead or blind. It's because they are only there for that reason. They work in teams because individually, I'll shred them like hashbrowns in a matter of seconds. I don't post here anymore. I came back and posted this only to be reminded why...

I estimate that there are maybe 2 to 3 genuine posters for every dozen here on DP. If it has anything to do with conspiracies or jews, they'll be there like flies on sht. You can post videos in HD of Bush blowing Cheney and they'll just say no it's not. They use the Mr. Magoo tactic and pretend to be unaware that you've just posted all the "proof" they had requested. Other used-up tactics include the "it's out of context" when paraphrasing, and the ages-old "any website that contains information contrary to whatever falsehood they are promoting... is not valid". "Truther" sites that are known for disseminating the truth....those are also no good. When they've used them all up, it's just flat-out unsupported denial. They are pathetic like Gollum because they'll continue even after you've just made them look soooo ridiculously dumb.

I've schooled them all so royally. I've engaged them as far as it will go - whereby then it's just the denial, refusing to discuss in further detail the glaring evidence I've posted, and, at the same time refusing to EVER post something in support of their denial. Over and over and over. And all the while DP just stands by watching, removing me from the thread first chance they get. Never mind the 9 idiots I've thoroughly exposed (well, really they've exposed themselves) as paid shills. It is this negligence that has led me to believe that DP itself was purposely set up this way. A genuine debate site would ban these morons once it became more than obvious that they were only there to poison the forum, spinning the threads in circles. It's counterproductive to the forum. If DP were legit, they wouldn't allow such blatant juvenile absurdity.

Look at the profiles of some of them and you'll find they spend around 8 hours a day posting - roughly about a day's work. You'd think that those who pay them would hire some good master bullshtters, but they settle for shills with no skills. They're no match for the "master of argument". I win EVERY time. Wanna know what the trick is? It's so simple. You just have to be on the right side of the argument.

There is nothing accurate in this post. All conspiracy theory by a poster who, since he can't prove anything that he has ever said, needs to find some other way to support his irrelevant and completely imagined theories. I've said this before... these are the tactics of conspiracy theorists. They have no facts, so what they attempt to do is use tactics to attempt to misdirect or attempt to confuse. Fortunately, many of our posters are far too intelligent to fall for these kinds of tactics, and enjoy pointing out the dishonesty and inaccuracy of what conspiracy theorists try to present.
 
They know they have no chance. Haven't you figured out DP yet? When people see a video of the driver of a limo shooting his rear passenger, .

Can you show us such a video?
 
I have a new question about an old subject. In the video of the Kennedy motorcade when he got shot, you can see the driver quickly turn around and shoot him, then continue driving as if nothing happened. How is it that nobody saw this before? I could see maybe the spectators missing it, but it took this long for someone to notice it in the video?? That's impossible. And why hasn't the guy been arrested, and the guy riding shotgun as well?

The video shows no such thing. It shows the driver turning around - a natural reaction given what was going on - nothing more. No raised
hand. No visible weapon. No shot. Nothing.
 
The driver killed Kennedy CT is a superb illustration of everything that is wrong with CT (non)thinking.

They take a single anomaly - Agent Greer looking back to see what is happening during the shooting - remove it from context, make a rather implausible claim based on that single anomaly removed from context, then of course reverse the burden of proof. Here is what they are actually proposing happened:

Star Chamber: Agent Greer, you have faithfully protected the President and been an integral part of his life for several years now and we appreciate that.
Greer: Thank you sir.
Star Chamber: Now we want you to kill him.
Greer: Excuse me but,...
Star Chamber: We've hired this sniper to shoot at him from the Texas Schoolbook Depository Building as your motorcade drives by in Dallas.
Greer: So what do you need me for if you have a sniper?
Star Chamber: Well, the sniper isn't very good so we need a backup plan,...
Greer: Why not hire a better sniper,...
Star Chamber: Did we mention you will be directly in the snipers line of fire,... and he's not very good, which is of course why we need you.
Greer: OK, I'm not really sure I'm good with that but won't it be kind of obvious, me shooting the President in open view and all?
Star Chamber: No. There is absolutely no chance any of the 5 other people in the car or any of the hundreds of spectators watching will see you draw a weapon, turn all the way around, aim it at the President then calmly put it away and keep on driving.
Greer: Oh OK. I get it. This is all making total sense now. Sounds simple, absolutely foolproof and very low risk.


But no CT who actually proposes such silly ideas ever thinks about that sort of stuff.
 
The video shows no such thing. It shows the driver turning around - a natural reaction given what was going on - nothing more. No raised
hand. No visible weapon. No shot. Nothing.

Post the video of the driver not shooting jfk.
 
The paraffin tests prove he didn't fire a rifle... " why are you blatantly lieing"

The paraffin tests prove he did a gun.

HIS GUN was found recently fired in the Texas Book Depository.

He was SEEN entering the Texas Book Depository with a large package.

Hmmmmmmmmmmm
 
Here's one example with commentary



He left out the frames where Greer's hands were off the wheel passing the gun. The video proves omission and nothing else.
 
Back
Top Bottom