• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Henry David's EVIDENCE of something other Flight 77 hitting the t[W:62,723,809:914***

Status
Not open for further replies.
re: Henry David's EVIDENCE of something other than Flight 77 hitting the Pent[W:62,723,809]

Bob0627 said:
Thanks for your opinion, most of which is repetitious. I happen to think there's an awful lot of merit to Honegger's theory. Many things she exposes contradict the official narrative in massive ways. It's only theory though of course, without a REAL investigation we can never really know the truth. The official story though, is extremely far fetched. But that's just me. Unlike Masters of the Universe, I speak for NO ONE but me.
Click to expand...

There has been a REAL investigation. Plenty of them in fact.

You simple reject their findings.
 
re: Henry David's EVIDENCE of something other than Flight 77 hitting the Pent[W:62,723,809]

So.

To recap.

ZERO evidence of something other than Flight 77 hitting the Pentagon.
 
re: Henry David's EVIDENCE of something other than Flight 77 hitting the Pent[W:62,723,809]

Sababa said:
A proponent of psychic warfare, Stubblebine was involved in a U.S. Military project to create "a breed of 'super soldier'" who would "have the ability to become invisible at will and to walk through walls". Stubblebine reportedly attempted to walk through walls himself.
Click to expand...

Emphasis mine.

It was sanctioned by the DOD. The D.I.A. and C.I.A. worked on "remote viewing" for over 20 years. The C.I.A. worked on mind control for the better part of 20 years. So discrediting an individual based off work sanctioned by government entities is a little off base, don't you think?
 
re: Henry David's EVIDENCE of something other than Flight 77 hitting the Pent[W:62,723,809]

Start watching this video at the 1:55:25 time mark...

September 11 -- The New Pearl Harbor (FULL)
September 11 -- The New Pearl Harbor (FULL) - YouTube


...and then read this thread.
The Light Poles Were Staged In Advance. - Pilots For 9/11 Truth Forum

All of the issues in post #1 are addressed there.


Also, the craft that hit the Pentagon was too small to be a 757.
Flight 77 3d sim test
(fifth picture from top)

That closes the whole case by itself.


Here's something else.
http://letsrollforums.com/barbara-olson-9-11-t20525.html?&highlight=barbara+olsen
 
re: Henry David's EVIDENCE of something other than Flight 77 hitting the Pent[W:62,723,809]

Jango said:
Emphasis mine.

It was sanctioned by the DOD. The D.I.A. and C.I.A. worked on "remote viewing" for over 20 years. The C.I.A. worked on mind control for the better part of 20 years. So discrediting an individual based off work sanctioned by government entities is a little off base, don't you think?
Click to expand...

no the point was he said he could walk through walls and attempted it a lot.

He isn't exactly someone who I would trust to be, you know, not easily fooled.
 
re: Henry David's EVIDENCE of something other than Flight 77 hitting the Pent[W:62,723,809]

Bob0627 said:
Thanks for your opinion, most of which is repetitious. I happen to think there's an awful lot of merit to Honegger's theory. Many things she exposes contradict the official narrative in massive ways. It's only theory though of course, without a REAL investigation we can never really know the truth. The official story though, is extremely far fetched. But that's just me. Unlike Masters of the Universe, I speak for NO ONE but me.
Click to expand...
For 911 truth followers real evidence is opinion, and opinions become evidence in the 911 truth fantasy of solid 12 years of failure and lies.

It is cool you can't take any of Honegger's lies and support them, save them from being the rant of a failed conspiracy theorist who failed to present evidence. you can't present evidence to support here nonsense.

You posted debunked lies - this is why 911 truth will never have a Pulitzer Prize, no newspaper can use the lies based on fantasy to earn more than bad fiction.

Where is your evidence?

911 truth failed to refute RADAR.
911 truth failed to refute DNA.
911 truth failed to refute FDR.
911 truth failed to present evidence.
911 truth failed to realize the lies are not evidence.
911 truth failed to realize their failed opinions are not evidence.

Pulitzer? Anytime soon? lol
 
re: Henry David's EVIDENCE of something other than Flight 77 hitting the Pent[W:62,723,809]

Scott said:
That closes the whole case by itself.
Click to expand...

NZxsqQj.gif


Sunzi said:
Pulitzer? Anytime soon? lol
Click to expand...

NZxsqQj.gif
 
re: Henry David's EVIDENCE of something other than Flight 77 hitting the Pent[W:62,723,809]

Scott said:
Start watching this video at the 1:55:25 time mark...

September 11 -- The New Pearl Harbor (FULL)
September 11 -- The New Pearl Harbor (FULL) - YouTube


...and then read this thread.
The Light Poles Were Staged In Advance. - Pilots For 9/11 Truth Forum

All of the issues in post #1 are addressed there.


Also, the craft that hit the Pentagon was too small to be a 757.
Flight 77 3d sim test
(fifth picture from top)

That closes the whole case by itself.


Here's something else.
http://letsrollforums.com/barbara-olson-9-11-t20525.html?&highlight=barbara+olsen
Click to expand...

So... The EVIDENCE it was something other than Flight 77?

Incredulity IS NOT EVIDENCE.

Blatant lies ARE NOT EVIDENCE.

What EVIDENCE can you provide?
 
re: Henry David's EVIDENCE of something other than Flight 77 hitting the Pent[W:62,723,809]

Sunzi said:
Where is your evidence?

Pulitzer? Anytime soon? lol
Click to expand...


Truthers have been demanding evidence since 2001, nice reversal.

debunkers failed to refute RADAR.
debunkers failed to refute DNA.
debunkers failed to refute FDR.
debunkers failed to present evidence.
debunkers failed to realize the lies are not evidence.
debunkers failed to realize their failed opinions are not evidence.

you claim its real you prove it
 
re: Henry David's EVIDENCE of something other than Flight 77 hitting the Pent[W:62,723,809]

Fledermaus said:
So... The EVIDENCE it was something other than Flight 77?

Incredulity IS NOT EVIDENCE.

Blatant lies ARE NOT EVIDENCE.

What EVIDENCE can you provide?
Click to expand...


2550803881_blind0629_image_xlarge.jpeg



debunkers always:

Smoking-Gun1-2.jpg
 
re: Henry David's EVIDENCE of something other than Flight 77 hitting the Pent[W:62,723,809]

KokomoJojo said:
Truthers have been demanding evidence since 2001, nice reversal.

debunkers failed to refute RADAR.
debunkers failed to refute DNA.
debunkers failed to refute FDR.
debunkers failed to present evidence.
debunkers failed to realize the lies are not evidence.
debunkers failed to realize their failed opinions are not evidence.

you claim its real you prove it
Click to expand...

It was 77, prove it was not and earn a Pulitzer Prize; if you can find a newspaper that turns lies from 911 truth into reality. Oops, that would be magic. Darn, stuck with no response. The Best 911 truth has, no evidence, no comment, no proof.

Guess what, no Pulitzer for 911 truth. 13th year doing nothing, with no evidence.
 
re: Henry David's EVIDENCE of something other than Flight 77 hitting the Pent[W:62,723,809]

Fledermaus said:
EVIDENCE of something other than Flight 77 hitting the Pentagon.


Explain the debris consistent with Flight 77 on the scene.

Explain the RADAR tracking consistent with Flight 77 on the scene.

Explain the landing gear consistent with Flight 77 on the scene.

Explain the wheel consistent with Flight 77 on the scene.

Explain the engine consistent with Flight 77 on the scene.

Explain the DNA consistent with Flight 77 on the scene.

Explain the luggage and personal effects consistent with Flight 77 on the scene.

Explain the damage to the building and building facade consistent with Flight 77 on the scene.

Explain the EYEWITNESS reports on the ground consistent with Flight 77 on the scene.

Explain the PHONE CALLS that ENDED with impact consistent with Flight 77 on the scene.
Click to expand...

IBTL

I predict you won't get any cogent answers, just evasions, accusations and insults.
 
re: Henry David's EVIDENCE of something other than Flight 77 hitting the Pent[W:62,723,809]

Sunzi said:
It was 77, prove it was not and earn a Pulitzer Prize; if you can find a newspaper that turns lies from 911 truth into reality. Oops, that would be magic. Darn, stuck with no response. The Best 911 truth has, no evidence, no comment, no proof.

Guess what, no Pulitzer for 911 truth. 13th year doing nothing, with no evidence.
Click to expand...

thats not the way it works, you want to play government then you prove up the governments claim.

I asked to see the complete inventory of plane parts where is it.
 
re: Henry David's EVIDENCE of something other than Flight 77 hitting the Pent[W:62,723,809]

Why is it that alternative explanations get a free pass by so many?
If you want to play "an alternative explanation" supporter. Then show your evidence and prove your correct.

Don't bother with the reverse burden of prove stance response. Don't bother with the response well alternative explanation authors are not the govt.
Any explanation needs to stand on its own merits and people should know that.

CIT can't even get agreement with those who disagree with the official report.
There is no agreement on what happened at the Pentagon amoung those who reject the official report.
12+ years and all we get is bash the govt. It is past time to bash those that spread unsupported explanation about 9/11.
 
re: Henry David's EVIDENCE of something other than Flight 77 hitting the Pent[W:62,723,809]

mike2810 said:
It is past time to bash those that spread unsupported explanation about 9/11.
Click to expand...

I'm coming up on 8 years of doing just that (as points allow). The ones that are genuinely curious or truly trying to learn are long gone. Now all we've got left are the ones that are genuinely making money, genuinely trolling, or genuinely stupid. Bashing is all they deserve.
 
re: Henry David's EVIDENCE of something other than Flight 77 hitting the Pent[W:62,723,809]

Sunzi said:
It was 77
Click to expand...

sure whatever you say, prove it.
 
re: Henry David's EVIDENCE of something other than Flight 77 hitting the Pent[W:62,723,809]

mike2810 said:
It is past time to bash those that spread unsupported explanation about 9/11.
Click to expand...


Yes we want to see the complete inventory of plane debris.
 
re: Henry David's EVIDENCE of something other than Flight 77 hitting the Pent[W:62,723,809]

505 said:
I'm coming up on 8 years of doing just that (as points allow). The ones that are genuinely curious or truly trying to learn are long gone. Now all we've got left are the ones that are genuinely making money, genuinely trolling, or genuinely stupid.
Click to expand...
Agreed all points - except 7years for me.

505 said:
Bashing is all they deserve.
Click to expand...
I'm not into bashing- I simply don't respond to posts that have no reasoned content unless I have a definite reason to do so which is rare. That includes the idiocies, lies, misrepresentation and general nonsense posted by some members -currently, as always, Koko. If members are so desperate that they need to resort to ridicule they are the ones needing help - not me. Occasionally I will carve up the nonsense posts if I judge it could help some other members - but there has to be something either topic content or debate process which needs "carving". Then anyone can feel free to simply tell me how thin they want the slices. Or "mince".
 
re: Henry David's EVIDENCE of something other than Flight 77 hitting the Pent[W:62,723,809]

Fledermaus said:
EVIDENCE of something other than Flight 77 hitting the Pentagon.


Explain the debris consistent with Flight 77 on the scene.

Explain the RADAR tracking consistent with Flight 77 on the scene.

Explain the landing gear consistent with Flight 77 on the scene.

Explain the wheel consistent with Flight 77 on the scene.

Explain the engine consistent with Flight 77 on the scene.

Explain the DNA consistent with Flight 77 on the scene.

Explain the luggage and personal effects consistent with Flight 77 on the scene.

Explain the damage to the building and building facade consistent with Flight 77 on the scene.

Explain the EYEWITNESS reports on the ground consistent with Flight 77 on the scene.

Explain the PHONE CALLS that ENDED with impact consistent with Flight 77 on the scene.
Click to expand...

I have an idea! It's genius.

Why don't all these people who claim to know EVERYTHING about 9-11 actually turn their supposed intelligence to - Oh - I don't know - something like A MISSING AIRPLANE. Perhaps? FLIGHT 370. If such people were wise and intelligent and - you know - capable of the critical thought they claim they must enact in order to crack the 9-11 conspiracy then surely solving the riddle of Flight 370 will be a piece of cake.
 
re: Henry David's EVIDENCE of something other than Flight 77 hitting the Pent[W:62,723,809]

Aunt Spiker said:
I have an idea! It's genius.

Why don't all these people who claim to know EVERYTHING about 9-11 actually turn their supposed intelligence to - Oh - I don't know - something like A MISSING AIRPLANE. Perhaps? FLIGHT 370. If such people were wise and intelligent and - you know - capable of the critical thought they claim they must enact in order to crack the 9-11 conspiracy then surely solving the riddle of Flight 370 will be a piece of cake.
Click to expand...

Have you missed the whacko threads on MH370? There are some classic examples of CT stupidity among the drivel.
 
re: Henry David's EVIDENCE of something other than Flight 77 hitting the Pent[W:62,723,809]

ozeco41 said:
Agreed all points - except 7years for me.

I'm not into bashing- I simply don't respond to posts that have no reasoned content unless I have a definite reason to do so which is rare. That includes the idiocies, lies, misrepresentation and general nonsense posted by some members -currently, as always, Koko. If members are so desperate that they need to resort to ridicule they are the ones needing help - not me. Occasionally I will carve up the nonsense posts if I judge it could help some other members - but there has to be something either topic content or debate process which needs "carving". Then anyone can feel free to simply tell me how thin they want the slices. Or "mince".
Click to expand...

nonsense thats literally all you do is bash.

You have been busted so many times for posting illogical crap I lost count.

When challenged you simply do not respond.

Yes everyone notices
 
re: Henry David's EVIDENCE of something other than Flight 77 hitting the Pent[W:62,723,809]

NWO_Spook said:
Have you missed the whacko threads on MH370? There are some classic examples of CT stupidity among the drivel.
Click to expand...

yeh but the real wacko is reading debunker material LOL
and that is in every thread.
 
re: Henry David's EVIDENCE of something other than Flight 77 hitting the Pent[W:62,723,809]

NWO_Spook said:
Have you missed the whacko threads on MH370? There are some classic examples of CT stupidity among the drivel.
Click to expand...
The good thing about here at DP with all the CT threads in one sub-forum...

...Some of the 9/11 trolls look semi-intelligent cf the other CTers.
 
re: Henry David's EVIDENCE of something other than Flight 77 hitting the Pent[W:62,723,809]

ozeco41 said:
The good thing about here at DP with all the CT threads in one sub-forum...

...Some of the 9/11 trolls look semi-intelligent cf the other CTers.
Click to expand...

when will we be graced with some semi intelligent debunkers? Or their parrots its all great entertainment
 
re: Henry David's EVIDENCE of something other than Flight 77 hitting the Pent[W:62,723,809]

KokomoJojo said:
Yes we want to see the complete inventory of plane debris.
Click to expand...

Yes, we want to see the cgi equipment that made the fake planes, wait,
we want to see the energy beam weapon, , wait
we want to see the thermite, no wait nano thermite, no wait the nuke, no mini neutron nuke explosives. or was it a cruise missle.

and yes koko. lets see the wreckage that shows it was not a commercial jet as claimed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom