• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Henry David's EVIDENCE of something other Flight 77 hitting the t[W:62,723,809:914***

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Henry David's EVIDENCE of something other than Flight 77 hitting the Pentagon [W:

Ok if you prefer was a pilot, unlike HD

Not being pedantic, just being pedantic.

Either way, the intended recipient for Post #1047 will no doubt not be commenting on it now or ever. Nor will he be adding any anything to the discussion beyond his usual vague platitudes and innuendo's without substance.

I say we stick a fork in this. Its done.
 
Last edited:
Re: Henry David's EVIDENCE of something other than Flight 77 hitting the Pentagon [W:

Not being pedantic, just being pedantic.

Either way, the intended recipient for Post #1047 will no doubt not be commenting on it now or ever. Nor will he be adding any anything to the discussion beyond his usual vague platitudes and innuendo's without substance.

I say we stick a fork in this. Its done.

I was hoping to lure HD here to end the derails on other threads.
 
Re: Henry David's EVIDENCE of something other than Flight 77 hitting the Pentagon [W:

I was hoping to lure HD here to end the derails on other threads.

Well then I ruined that for you by being both specific and factual, both of which are HD Kryptonite. My apologies.
 
Re: Henry David's EVIDENCE of something other than Flight 77 hitting the Pentagon [W:

Well then I ruined that for you by being both specific and factual, both of which are HD Kryptonite. My apologies.

You certainly did not ruin the thread. You elevated it.

One post like #1047 is worth more than all of HD's contribution to this thread.
 
Re: Henry David's EVIDENCE of something other than Flight 77 hitting the Pentagon [W:



A standard rate turn is two minutes for 360 degrees. The turn depicted here is two and a half minutes for 270 degrees.

aa77_final_maneuver.png


The rollout at about five mile "final," which is a perfectly normal starting point for a final approach.


Moving from the Dubai thread to an appropriate place.
 
Re: Henry David's EVIDENCE of something other Flight 77 hitting the t[W:62,723,809:91

Hani The Hero! Ain't it great!

The story is so solid that the FDR data is not assigned to an airframe. :mrgreen:
 
Re: Henry David's EVIDENCE of something other Flight 77 hitting the t[W:62,723,809:91

Hani The Hero! Ain't it great!

The story is so solid that the FDR data is not assigned to an airframe. :mrgreen:

Wow, still playing that one? 2006 called and wants its BS back.
 
Re: Henry David's EVIDENCE of something other Flight 77 hitting the t[W:62,723,809:91

Wow, still playing that one? 2006 called and wants its BS back.

HD in another thread with his statements of no planes is saying the Vmo issue Capt Bob (P4911T) has posted is a fabrication and lies.

It is interesting he never challenged Capt Bob or his followers when they were posting on this site.
 
Re: Henry David's EVIDENCE of something other Flight 77 hitting the t[W:62,723,809:91

Wow, still playing that one? 2006 called and wants its BS back.

Truth persists.

Bull**** walks. :mrgreen:
 
Re: Henry David's EVIDENCE of something other Flight 77 hitting the t[W:62,723,809:91

Truth persists.

Bull**** walks. :mrgreen:

Lay it out then. Start to finish. Lets here it all finally.
 
Re: Henry David's EVIDENCE of something other Flight 77 hitting the t[W:62,723,809:91

Lay it out then. Start to finish. Lets here it all finally.

Some people are unable to perceive the truth, even when it is right in front of them. It is hard to describe a rainbow to a blind person. I have no desire to try doing the same with you. :peace
 
Re: Henry David's EVIDENCE of something other Flight 77 hitting the t[W:62,723,809:91

Some people are unable to perceive the truth, even when it is right in front of them. It is hard to describe a rainbow to a blind person. I have no desire to try doing the same with you. :peace

Yet you believe yourselves holders and defenders of truth, yet RUN AWAY from bringing anything of substance ... no wonder you lot have NOT achieved anything in the real world over all this ... you are all not "bothered" enough to bring actual proofs ... and ALL pretend the same self-soothing excuses for your failures to put up.
 
Re: Henry David's EVIDENCE of something other Flight 77 hitting the t[W:62,723,809:91

Near FIFTEEN YEARS later and truthers STILL pretend they have more than they bring ... winning tactic there truthers !!! :roll:
 
Re: Henry David's EVIDENCE of something other Flight 77 hitting the t[W:62,723,809:91

Some people are unable to perceive the truth, even when it is right in front of them. It is hard to describe a rainbow to a blind person. I have no desire to try doing the same with you. :peace

Now how did I know that was coming?
 
Re: Henry David's EVIDENCE of something other Flight 77 hitting the t[W:62,723,809:91

Now how did I know that was coming?
Well 1064 posts when only one was needed -- "ZERO"

...when we collate the process memes for 9/11 CT discussion we should include an inverse thread length rule - number of posts is inversely related to the simplicity of the OP and extends asymptotically towards infinity.

(And - for the math(s) pedants - yes I know but I wanted to use a big word.)
 
Re: Henry David's EVIDENCE of something other Flight 77 hitting the t[W:62,723,809:91

Near FIFTEEN YEARS later and truthers STILL pretend they have more than they bring ... winning tactic there truthers !!! :roll:
Actually it is a winning tactic if you look at the current objective - keep discussion going and going round in circles.

The truth movement effectively abdicated debate of WTC CD claims when they switched focus from Twin Towers to WTC7.

It was an admission that they had lost the battle for CD - such as it was. Hardly a "battle" - maybe "skirmish"???

Their one victory of longer significance was that they had taught "debunkers" (The new fashion word back then BTW) to accept "reversed burden of DISproof". Which we had willingly done for the Twins since all the necessary evidence was out there in full view and we enjoy showing how clever we are at forensic physics. (Forget that not all of us are but.....many of us are probably better than the average truther. And the silly claims of even the leading light truthers T Sz and DC are easy meat.)

I doubt any truther was aware - deliberated - the switch to WTC 7 BUT it did make it much harder for those of us who wanted to prove them wrong because all the key evidence was hidden inside the building.

But by then everyone seemed to forget where the burden of proof really lies. And...

....back to my opening assertion "Actually it is a winning tactic if you look at the current objective - keep discussion going and going round in circles."


:roll: ;)
 
Re: Henry David's EVIDENCE of something other Flight 77 hitting the t[W:62,723,809:91

It was an admission that they had lost the battle for CD - such as it was. Hardly a "battle" - maybe "skirmish"???

Mild taunting?
 
Re: Henry David's EVIDENCE of something other Flight 77 hitting the t[W:62,723,809:91

Now how did I know that was coming?

Because we've been through this before. As you have demonstrated before, it is impossible to have a rational discussion with a person in denial of facts.
 
Re: Henry David's EVIDENCE of something other Flight 77 hitting the t[W:62,723,809:91

Because we've been through this before. As you have demonstrated before, it is impossible to have a rational discussion with a person in denial of facts.

No ... the REAL reality is that you lot of truthers have NOTHING but empty hot air ... which is WHY you have achieved NOTHING in the real world of this.

And are slowly dying as a movement ... less and less interest or relevance ... and the FURTHER away from the day itself the LESS interest it has for the world in general.

Sorry Thoreau, but you lot are NEVER going to be shown right nor get your demanded new investigation ... just NOT ever going to happen for you all.
 
Re: Henry David's EVIDENCE of something other Flight 77 hitting the t[W:62,723,809:91

Because we've been through this before. As you have demonstrated before, it is impossible to have a rational discussion with a person in denial of facts.

We know.
 
Re: Henry David's EVIDENCE of something other Flight 77 hitting the t[W:62,723,809:91

Moderator's Warning:
Ever since this thread was necro'd no actual discussion has been going on. Just insults to one side or the other. Since no actual discussion is going on this necro'd thread is now shot in the head.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom