• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Race War

My bad. I don't know what a CT is...I'm used to other than the poster's words in a quote box. Again my bad.

Like a tuna from the deep blue sea. It happens. Maybe I should have been like "Oh, yeah? I'm gonna go do something right now!" Just to see your reaction.
 
2. Claim that the media sensationalizes white on black crime but ignores black on white crime.

There is some truth to that. A recent example, which also involves the Justice Department, is the "knockout game." Blacks were sucker punching people of different skin colors and it was called assault. But when a white man sucker punched a black person, it was labeled a hate crime.

White (or "white Hispanic") crimes against blacks are particularly sensationalized if a firearm is involved. The disparity is that the outrageous amount of black-on-black crime in places like Chicago are largely ignored (minus the Chicago Tribune and CBS Local Chicago). It is when crimes are interracial that the larger media machine gets rolling.
 
There will never be a race war, the white race will be pretty much gone in 50 years.

No white people alive today will still be living in 50 years?
 
Last edited:
There is some truth to that. A recent example, which also involves the Justice Department, is the "knockout game." Blacks were sucker punching people of different skin colors and it was called assault.
I was under the impression that "knockout" was a few isolated incidences that were blown out of proportion by the self-pitying covert white nationalists among the right wing.

White (or "white Hispanic") crimes against blacks are particularly sensationalized if a firearm is involved. The disparity is that the outrageous amount of black-on-black crime in places like Chicago are largely ignored (minus the Chicago Tribune and CBS Local Chicago). It is when crimes are interracial that the larger media machine gets rolling.

You don't think that there are crimes committed by whites against blacks that go unreported? Does the news media cover every single murder committed by, say, the Aryan Brotherhood against African-Americans?

What incidences of white-on-black crime do you specifically have in mind when you make this claim?
 
Google it, its predicted. And I believe it.

OH, Google has a crystal ball? Please, they only make future predictions based upon current trends. Besides, I highly doubt that it says white people won't exist in 50 years. Plenty of people are young now and will still be alive in 50 years. :roll: And white people are STILL having children, just not as at a high a rate as some others.
 
OH, Google has a crystal ball? Please, they only make future predictions based upon current trends. Besides, I highly doubt that it says white people won't exist in 50 years. Plenty of people are young now and will still be alive in 50 years. :roll: And white people are STILL having children, just not as at a high a rate as some others.

How old are you, I am 51 this week. I can bet there will not be pure white race in the US in 50 years.
 
How old are you, I am 51 this week. I can bet there will not be pure white race in the US in 50 years.

I guess eco was right, you really do exist. :lol: Do you realize that there are white children? You think they are all going to be dead in 50 years? Not that a "pure" white race really matters anyways.
 
How old are you, I am 51 this week. I can bet there will not be pure white race in the US in 50 years.

I can bet there has never been a "pure white race" in recorded history. If you go back far enough, it's very likely that one of your ancestors was black, Asian, Arab, or Native American.
 
I can bet there has never been a "pure white race" in recorded history. If you go back far enough, it's very likely that one of your ancestors was black, Asian, Arab, or Native American.

I've heard that before.
 
I've heard that before.

I don't remember having heard that specifically, but I've heard similar genealogical factoids, like how most white people are descended from the medieval emperor Charlemagne. When considering the extent to which European culture has interacted with the rest of the world, it should really be no surprise that most whites in the United States (if not in the entire world) have at least some nonwhite ancestry.

Either way, who cares? It's not as if the existence of a pure white race has any intrinsic value.
 
I can bet there has never been a "pure white race" in recorded history. If you go back far enough, it's very likely that one of your ancestors was black, Asian, Arab, or Native American.

Actually it's a certainty. Go back far enough and everyone comes from Africa.
 
I was under the impression that "knockout" was a few isolated incidences that were blown out of proportion by the self-pitying covert white nationalists among the right wing.

You don't think that there are crimes committed by whites against blacks that go unreported? Does the news media cover every single murder committed by, say, the Aryan Brotherhood against African-Americans?

What incidences of white-on-black crime do you specifically have in mind when you make this claim?

1) Saying 'few' is being generous. There was a several month stretch that there was a new victim every few days when the "game" was at the height of its popularity. What do you mean by "blown out of proportion"? Randomly assaulting people on the street by punching them in the back of the head is quite heinous, regardless of skin color. There's a reason why boxing and MMA have banned blows to the back of the head - it can be lethal.

2) Of course. Probably not.

3) Since I referenced firearms and "white Hispanic" I was referring to the "loud music shooting" and George Zimmerman. It's the mixture of firearms and interracial violence that (typically) gets the attention of a news organization like CNN. It gets even more attention (from CNN) if cameras are allowed in the courtroom.
 
You don't think that there are crimes committed by whites against blacks that go unreported? Does the news media cover every single murder committed by, say, the Aryan Brotherhood against African-Americans?

What incidences of white-on-black crime do you specifically have in mind when you make this claim?

It would probably aid the conversation to base it on police reports as collected by the Department of Justice.

Interracialmurderstats_zpsf445c30f.jpg
 
I can bet there has never been a "pure white race" in recorded history. If you go back far enough, it's very likely that one of your ancestors was black, Asian, Arab, or Native American.
My family comes from southern Italy, not far from Africa. So you may be right. My father was darker than many "blacks" I see now a days.
Ofcourse that don't stop the idiots on here from calling me a racist.
But that said, there are pure and have been pure Caucasian races in history. No big deal about that, but with so much race mixing going on today. There is no hope that there will be a white race in the US in the near future.
 
As to the graphs in post #41, the Department of Justice combines non-Hispanic whites and Hispanics into the category "white." So in graph 20a, the "white" on black murder rate is the combination of white and Hispanic and together they are 1/3rd the rate of the black on white murder rate.
 
Don't you think this works the same way in the reverse. Those who are always out looking for examples of "racism," even where there is no proof or even evidence of such, just to rile up certain portions of the community.

Too true. A vicious cycle.
 
As to the graphs in post #41, the Department of Justice combines non-Hispanic whites and Hispanics into the category "white." So in graph 20a, the "white" on black murder rate is the combination of white and Hispanic and together they are 1/3rd the rate of the black on white murder rate.

Like anyone is still paying attention to chart-spams and the illogical conclusions you draw from them.
 
Don't you think this works the same way in the reverse. Those who are always out looking for examples of "racism," even where there is no proof or even evidence of such, just to rile up certain portions of the community. Instead of letting sleeping dogs lie, there are some who have to seek out racism and try to apply it to vast portions of the population, which is kind of just as ridiculous.

And about race wars, come on! How many white people do you actually think are going to be convinced to join in some silly "race war" that only exists in their own twisted minds?

































Aussie Journalist on American Race War
 
Don't you think this works the same way in the reverse. Those who are always out looking for examples of "racism," even where there is no proof or even evidence of such, just to rile up certain portions of the community. Instead of letting sleeping dogs lie, there are some who have to seek out racism and try to apply it to vast portions of the population, which is kind of just as ridiculous.

And about race wars, come on! How many white people do you actually think are going to be convinced to join in some silly "race war" that only exists in their own twisted minds?

https://www.google.com/url?q=http:/...ds-cse&usg=AFQjCNHR_W0dYArp_RbdUSlm3w5A1bCj4Q































Aussie Journalist on American Race War
 
All of the Dindu Nuffins will burn everything down. I guess Charles Manson was right about "Helter Skelter" after all
 
This is an often ignored CT. I don't think I've seen any threads in this subforum about it. Bits and pieces of it appear occasionally in 'breaking news' or other subforums, presumably by people who have no idea they're engaging in CT at all, let alone a racist one. These poor folks are basically accidental truthers. They picked up part of the routine somewhere and never looked for the rest. The special thing about this CT is that it is also a call to violence. I'll try to lay it out simply, we can fill in the details.


1. Emotional story about black on white violent crime. This sets the tone.
2. Claim that the media sensationalizes white on black crime but ignores black on white crime.
2a. This media bias covers up a race war going on by blacks against whites. Proportions are distorted through the emotional cover story and fantasy numbers resulting from the presumed bias.
2b. The Jews, of course right, (Rothchild) that control the media are waging war against whites (in cahoots) with blacks.
3. What can be done about it? Fight back, white people! There's a race war goin' on and your children are at stake!!11!!
4. The claim of the media sensationalizing crimes by whites against blacks is also a promise of fame. Thereby, if one does fight back, one'll get ~"national news every day for weeks!!".


Of course, there is no such media bias. It's a CT, and a nasty one.

Yup. So.... Heard any news from South Africa lately? :lamo
 
Don't you think this works the same way in the reverse. Those who are always out looking for examples of "racism," even where there is no proof or even evidence of such, just to rile up certain portions of the community. Instead of letting sleeping dogs lie, there are some who have to seek out racism and try to apply it to vast portions of the population, which is kind of just as ridiculous.

And about race wars, come on! How many white people do you actually think are going to be convinced to join in some silly "race war" that only exists in their own twisted minds?

It's most likely a trash thread as is.
I could ask everyone in my building at not one will probably come back with anything remotely close to this kind of crap.
 
Back
Top Bottom