• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Unbelievable religious thinking. Pedophillia.

iLOL No. The link is not religion. The link is debased behavior on the part of individuals. The religion has nothing to do with it.

Are you still defending pedophile priests and making excuses for the religion that turned a blind eye to it for over 1500 years?
 
Are you still defending pedophile priests and making excuses for the religion that turned a blind eye to it for over 1500 years?
That is not debate.
All you are doing is lying like you usually do.
 
All you are doign is lying like you usually do.

So, if you're not defending pedophile priests and the religion that protected them for 1500 years, please do explain what the **** you are doing.
 
So, if you're not defending pedophile priests and the religion that protected them for 1500 years, please do explain what the **** you are doing.

So you continue with your nonsense and lies. That is not debate.
Figures.
 
So you continue with your nonsense and lies. That is not debate.
Figures.

Ah, so you refuse to explain.

Dismissed.
 
iLOL No. The link is not religion. The link is debased behavior on the part of individuals. The religion has nothing to do with it.

So the fact that religions, all of them, are a happy hunting ground for pedophiles who are supported and enabled by a community of habitually lying people in a social framework that gives far more regard to social position than to truth has nothing to do with it then?

Well I disagree.
 
I find it mind numbing that you people even find this surprising or even shocking.
You have 3 lesbians, 2 'suspected' gay males, and 4 college frat boys of whom at least two have been accused of possibly raping or at the very least sexually assaulting someone.
These 9 people are currently in charge of shaping your society and you dont do a damn thing about it.
You continue to elect the same jack hole people every 2, 4 or 6 years and expect change.
None of you can even agree on common societal goals!
America is done. whatever we have now will only become more morally corrupt, create a larger seperation of classes based on money status...Basically whatever Rome was in the end before the generals took over... Thats Military law, not martial law where some civil albeit aristocratic authority is in charge.
 
Nikita Khrushchev would be laughing his butt off right now if he were alive
 
Another ignoramus thread blaming religion for the evil of man.

As if it were part of doctrine and dogma....


How pathetic.


:yawn:
 
NIKITA KHRUSHCHEV -- THE "SMALL DOSES" QUOTE - 1960

"We cannot expect Americans to jump from capitalism to Communism, but we can assist their elected leaders in giving Americans small doses of socialism until they suddenly awake to find they have Communism."
 
Another ignoramus thread blaming religion for the evil of man.

As if it were part of doctrine and dogma....


How pathetic.


:yawn:

Religion is an evil of man
 
Another ignoramus thread blaming religion for the evil of man.

As if it were part of doctrine and dogma....


How pathetic.


:yawn:

It causes a power structure which enables this sort of thing.
 
I disagree. That they will never admit it does not mean they don't understand it.

I doubt authoritarians who fear a sky daddy get it. It's ingrained in their heads to perceive ordained power structures of their faith as good. They do, however, notice its flaws when looking at someone else's religion. But, their own? Never.
 
I doubt authoritarians who fear a sky daddy get it. It's ingrained in their heads to perceive ordained power structures of their faith as good. They do, however, notice its flaws when looking at someone else's religion. But, their own? Never.

Again I disagree. The entire basis, as far as I can tell, for their faith is to have an identity and group to belong to to be part of such a power structure. The greater the need to lie about reality the better, generally, this means that given all the people you are with in your group are collectively lying then your lying is automatically sanctioned.

Knowing it is bag of bollocks is the whole point.
 
You are engaged in irrational stupidity.
Apparently you you have no clue as to what religeous thinking is.

I think he does. Religious 'thinking' is the abandonment of reason, replacing it with 'faith' in nonsensical dogmas. Religion is a backward and primitive enemy of science, good old plain common sense and every other sort of rational thinking.
 
Pell is a disgusting charlatan and rapist. Hitchens is rolling over in his grave.

The entire church needs to be charged under RICO and dismantled. No American can claim any moral high ground if they're a catholic and continue to practice this disgusting religion.
 
Whoever his laywer is, is absolute scum.

They have to do that, they have to argue for their clients no matter what or they could get disbarred. I definitely would never want to be a lawyer and making ridiculous arguments for the sake of the client
 
Again I disagree. The entire basis, as far as I can tell, for their faith is to have an identity and group to belong to to be part of such a power structure. The greater the need to lie about reality the better, generally, this means that given all the people you are with in your group are collectively lying then your lying is automatically sanctioned.

Knowing it is bag of bollocks is the whole point.

I think that a large proportion of the religious actually believe all the tripe that goes with their particular faith. The nuns that taught me that the Jews killed Jesus were not 'lying'; they actually believed it. So, I think did at at least a majority of priests actually believe that by reciting the right magic spell they could change a wafer into the body of Christ.
 
They have to do that, they have to argue for their clients no matter what or they could get disbarred. I definitely would never want to be a lawyer and making ridiculous arguments for the sake of the client

Yep. Anything short of breaking the law is acceptable. And, yes. Lawyering can be the equivalent of eating turds out of a scumbag’s ass. Imagine defending a rapist piece of ****.
 
I think that a large proportion of the religious actually believe all the tripe that goes with their particular faith. The nuns that taught me that the Jews killed Jesus were not 'lying'; they actually believed it. So, I think did at at least a majority of priests actually believe that by reciting the right magic spell they could change a wafer into the body of Christ.

I fully expect that they were able to believe it in the sense of believing the story in Star Wars. You go with the flow suspending your disbelief.

But when it matters, when the easy rout os to not believe it, I think they would suddenly lose their faith, mostly.
 
They have to do that, they have to argue for their clients no matter what or they could get disbarred. I definitely would never want to be a lawyer and making ridiculous arguments for the sake of the client

Vanilla penetration against the wish of the child........

Nope, that is not helping your clients case. It does show your basic thinking.
 
I doubt authoritarians who fear a sky daddy get it. It's ingrained in their heads to perceive ordained power structures of their faith as good. They do, however, notice its flaws when looking at someone else's religion. But, their own? Never.

A sky daddy:lol:funny. Im not proposing that their is or isnt a 'sky daddy'. However, mankind did not discover or invent math. Math revealed itself to man. The chronos of our own solar system indicates intelligence in function. Did the sun and planets go to planet school?
The very shape of almost all celestial bodies, the circle, is itself an infinite yet defined object. Pi never ends but begins with 3.
I was led to believe in santa claus. Not true
Most are being led to believe that their isn't a creator that can not be defined or described by mankinds science. A science that has not yet defined or described gravity and its causes
 
Back
Top Bottom