• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

"Separation of Church and State"

Actually the christian religion is the most successful institution in human history organized mostly around the Great Commandment: Love thy neighbor as thyself. The liberal school shooters don't exactly follow the Great Commandment. They have your more real and obvious God.

Complete and total nonsense. Christianity is one of the most successful invasion forces in all of history, eradicating indigenous belief, misconstruing facts as myths, and convincing people they are somehow more valuable than they really are.

It's one of the most abusive, ignorant, and grotesque institutions ever devised.
 
a liberal imagines teaching billions of children the 10 commandments is propaganda. See why we are sure liberalism is based in pure ignorance?

FIVE of the Ten Commandments are not a problem, as practically every religion known to history has taught them.

1) Honour your parents
2) Don't kill other humans
3) Don't have sex with another person if your partner is not told or disapproves
4) Don't take the goods of another person
5) Don't tell lies that harm another person.

The whole 'coveting' thing, as long as it is not acted upon - by taking another's possessions - ain't never going away. We will always covet what another person has, that we don't have, but as long as the desire stays inside of us, what's the big deal?
 
FIVE of the Ten Commandments are not a problem, as practically every religion known to history has taught them.

1) Honour your parents
2) Don't kill other humans
3) Don't have sex with another person if your partner is not told or disapproves
4) Don't take the goods of another person
5) Don't tell lies that harm another person.

The whole 'coveting' thing, as long as it is not acted upon - by taking another's possessions - ain't never going away. We will always covet what another person has, that we don't have, but as long as the desire stays inside of us, what's the big deal?

The whole Thou shalt have no other gods before me is itself a call to violence. Let alone the idols.

It's absolutely absurd to believe otherwise.
 
Actually the christian religion is the most successful institution in human history organized mostly around the Great Commandment: Love thy neighbor as thyself. The liberal school shooters don't exactly follow the Great Commandment. They have your more real and obvious God.
Yea, the hypocrisy and love are just oozing from your moronic posts.
 
Yea, the hypocrisy and love are just oozing from your moronic posts.

Actually the Christian religion is the most successful institution in human history organized mostly around the Great Commandment: Love thy neighbor as thyself. The liberal school shooters don't exactly follow the Great Commandment. They worship have your more real, obvious, and liberal God.
 
The whole Thou shalt have no other gods before me is itself a call to violence. Let alone the idols.

Better to have the one Christian God and his Great Commandment: "Love thy neighbor as thyself" than great liberal Gods like HItler Stalin Mao who banned our God and killed 200 million human souls. Now do you understand?
 
FIVE of the Ten Commandments are not a problem, as practically every religion known to history has taught them.

Christianity taught them to billions so is the greatest force for good in human history. LIberals despise Christianity and love Sanders HItler Stalin and Mao. What does that teach you?
 
It's one of the most abusive, ignorant, and grotesque institutions ever devised.

Teaching morality to billions after they had been perfectly immoral Romans is abusive and grotesque? See why we say liberalism is based in pure ignorance?
 
Better to have the one Christian God and his Great Commandment: "Love thy neighbor as thyself" than great liberal Gods like HItler Stalin Mao who banned our God and killed 200 million human souls. Now do you understand?

This is about free speech...so why no answer here?:

In America, the right to free expression applies to all.

And our Constitution protects us (hopefully, and by design) from the thinking of all of your examples except on a personal choice level.

Are you claiming we shut up people that speak out that there is no Christian God? (Er, Stalin didnt make speeches about killing millions).
 
Better to have the one Christian God and his Great Commandment: "Love thy neighbor as thyself"

As your moral hero's in the White House crap all over the 9th Commandment; "Thou shalt not lie"
 
Actually the Christian religion is the most successful institution in human history organized mostly around the Great Commandment: Love thy neighbor as thyself. The liberal school shooters don't exactly follow the Great Commandment. They worship have your more real, obvious, and liberal God.
None of your incoherent drivel negates what I said.
 
Christianity taught them to billions so is the greatest force for good in human history. LIberals despise Christianity and love Sanders HItler Stalin and Mao. What does that teach you?
It clearly shows that all you can post is ignorant moronic crap.
 
Christianity taught them to billions so is the greatest force for good in human history. LIberals despise Christianity and love Sanders HItler Stalin and Mao. What does that teach you?

Other religions also taught moral behaviour to billions. Liberals don't despise Christianity but some of the do despise some of those who claim to be Christian while acting in non-Christian ways. The billions who call themselves Christian can't agree with each other, there are approximately 34,000 groups calling themselves Christian, so why should any non-Christian pay attention to the babbling.

It is delusional to claim that Liberals or Progressives love Hitler, Stalin and Mao but not unexpected that a person with near total ignorance of actual historical facts would make such a claim.
 
Other religions also taught moral behaviour to billions.

there is nothing half as big and successful as Christianity in all of human history which obviously explains why the liberal clean forgot to tell us who the others are. See why we say liberalism is based in pure ignorance? Now do you understand? Now are you a conservative?
 
why should any non-Christian pay attention to the babbling.

because they want to live in a world where the Great Christian Commandment is very very important. 1+1=2
 
It is delusional to claim that Liberals or Progressives love Hitler, Stalin and Mao but not unexpected that a person with near total ignorance of actual historical facts would make such a claim.

Then why did our liberals spy for Hitler and Stalin? Did you know the only reason they didn't spy for Mao was racism? Do you know why Sanders honeymooned in the Stalin's USSR??? Do you know why Sanders speaks right out of the communist manifesto:"You don’t necessarily need a choice of 23 underarm spray deodorants when children are hungry in this country," Sanders told John Harwood

Do you know why Sanders calls himself a socialist like HItler Stalin and Mao
 
a person with near total ignorance of actual historical facts would make such a claim.

if true why is the liberal so afraid to present his best example of this near total ignorance? What does the liberal learn from his constant fear?
 
if true why is the liberal so afraid to present his best example of this near total ignorance? What does the liberal learn from his constant fear?

jimmy, every rational person who has read your responses knows that it is only you who is living in constant fear. Of what, I am unsure but definitely, you are afraid of something.
 
Then why did our liberals spy for Hitler and Stalin? Did you know the only reason they didn't spy for Mao was racism? Do you know why Sanders honeymooned in the Stalin's USSR??? Do you know why Sanders speaks right out of the communist manifesto:"You don’t necessarily need a choice of 23 underarm spray deodorants when children are hungry in this country," Sanders told John Harwood

Do you know why Sanders calls himself a socialist like HItler Stalin and Mao

im still spying for robot stalin
 
Better to have the one Christian God and his Great Commandment: "Love thy neighbor as thyself" than great liberal Gods like HItler Stalin Mao who banned our God and killed 200 million human souls. Now do you understand?

19789999.jpg
 
It says there shall be no religious test for office and that congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting free exercise thereof (incorporated by the 14th amendment to apply to the states). As Jefferson wrote, this creates a wall of separation.

In what way do you disagree with Mr. Jefferson? How do you think religion can play a formal role in government or government in religion, given the restrictions of the Constitution?

The Declaration of Independence, declared independence from England. In England, the King decided the official religion of England. The King formed the Church of England to be similar to the Catholic Church. However, the King added a divorce clause, so he could divorce his wife. The Catholic Church ddi not allow this. The King dumbed it down. Jefferson did not want a secular government to be in charge of religion, since this meant man will dictate to God, for man's own benefit. God was supposed to remain above man.

If Government was to decide which religion was to become nationalized, you end up with lawyers, politicians and their donors deciding the fate of God and Religion. Every bizarre left wing group would have addendum in the bible; polytheistic heathen religion.The idea was to let Religion remain organic, based on natural selection; free exercise instead of forced compliance to the whims of politics.

The best way to understand the position of Jefferson is to realize he did not come up with separation of church and state, in a vacuum. Rather our founding fathers, like Jefferson, built his ideas upon the thinking and experiences of his founding fathers. The founding fathers of Jefferson, among others, were the Pilgrims. They came to America to escape the state run religion of England, and its tendency to persecute anyone not with their program. The King used religion like a secular tool. The Pilgrim began with a socialist experiment, but found it necessary to change to free enterprise. Jefferson extrapolated from that.
 
The Declaration of Independence, declared independence from England. In England, the King decided the official religion of England. The King formed the Church of England to be similar to the Catholic Church. However, the King added a divorce clause, so he could divorce his wife. The Catholic Church ddi not allow this. The King dumbed it down. Jefferson did not want a secular government to be in charge of religion, since this meant man will dictate to God, for man's own benefit. God was supposed to remain above man.

If Government was to decide which religion was to become nationalized, you end up with lawyers, politicians and their donors deciding the fate of God and Religion. Every bizarre left wing group would have addendum in the bible; polytheistic heathen religion.The idea was to let Religion remain organic, based on natural selection; free exercise instead of forced compliance to the whims of politics.

The best way to understand the position of Jefferson is to realize he did not come up with separation of church and state, in a vacuum. Rather our founding fathers, like Jefferson, built his ideas upon the thinking and experiences of his founding fathers. The founding fathers of Jefferson, among others, were the Pilgrims. They came to America to escape the state run religion of England, and its tendency to persecute anyone not with their program. The King used religion like a secular tool. The Pilgrim began with a socialist experiment, but found it necessary to change to free enterprise. Jefferson extrapolated from that.
I have no idea why you wrote that in response to me. I was asking the question for those opposed to separation of Church and state. But your answer is a lite odd.

Your comments on Henry VIII are not quite true: he asked the Pope for an annulment, not a divorce, and under rules the Church already allowed. The new Church of England did not include a “divorce clause,” and divorce was very difficult to get for a long time.

But even more bizarre is your claim that the Pilgrims were opposed to state-run religion. The Plymouth colony was a rreligious colony implementing Biblical law. Dissenters were punished or exiled.

And the pilgrims were in no way founding fathers for Jefferson: he was from Virginia, which had the Church of England as it’s official religion until 1786.

So in all, I can’t tell if you were trying to answer my question, agree with me or contradict me.
 
Last edited:
I don't think there's much of a difference between the religious Right enforcing its will on everyone or those other groups you mentioned, James.

Any religion that demands state sanction, and the legal codification and enforcement of its rules and proscriptions isn't much of a religion.
 
Jefferson extrapolated from that.

Most importantly Jefferson thought Jesus was the most important teacher in all of human history and he desperately wanted all human beings to learn from him!!

John Adams: Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people”. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”
 
Any religion that demands state sanction, and the legal codification and enforcement of its rules and proscriptions isn't much of a religion.

too bad christianity didn't enforce its rules on all the murderers, suicides, school shooters, rapists. Liberals simple lack the IQ to understand that Christianity is the basis for our morality. THey seem to think it comes from the Girl Scouts.
 
Back
Top Bottom