Erm ,they are not " new words " , just " new words " to you perhaps ..........and it's Polyarchy , not "polyarcy". I could have used Kleptocracy too if you want to google that :lol:
New to you.
One might check a dictionary web
cite before whining about spelling.
Slavery was " successful " as a system of socio-economic organisation , as was/is Feudalism . To claim something is successful isn't or shouldn't be the only criteria with which to judge how societies should be structured or organized. Nazism transformed pre WW2 Germany and the lives of Germans living there but I don't think it should serve as a role model . So obvious really but apparently not to you.
As to the bolded, neither were as effective, prosperous or as equitable as the "Western Democracies" you babble about. And fascism has zero to do with "Western Democracies" because... democracy.
You are lost to the realities of your political system, how it functions and who it serves so it's a complete waste of time trying to discuss it with you. I will give you an example . Obama's election campaign won awards for its marketing of the Obama product in the US in the election year. The big funders and lobby groups fund both sides in the best democracy money can buy. All the people you cited served the interests of the same people Obama did or Trump has.
And why isn't marketing a legitimate concern for politicians? You really are naive in the ways of politics. Marketing has been going on as long as elections. To deny that is ignorance.
AND WHAT DOES THAT HAVE TO DO WITH DEMOCRACY?
So , I will ask you again seeing as I didn't see an answer worthy of the name in your reply........... if we live in a meaningful democracy , a functioning democracy , how come massive corporations pay less of a percentage of their wealth in tax than people on minimum wages ? How come corporations get massive state handouts and bail outs while millions of people have no proper access to healthcare or have lost their homes ? I could go on with this and cite how the 1% are getting richer and richer whilst the rest are getting poorer but it would make no difference to you.
Less of a percentage of their wealth in tax than people on minimum wages?... False. You obviously do not understand businesses and their interactions with the tax system. Every time I see someone say a corporation pays "too little" I am reminded how ignorant people can be. Tell me of a company that is paying "too low" taxes. Minimum wage earners in the US normally pay NOTHING. The roughly 50% on the bottom of the pay scale pay nothing.
AND WHAT DOES THAT HAVE TO DO WITH DEMOCRACY?
How come corporations get massive state handouts and bail outs while millions of people have no proper access to healthcare or have lost their homes ? More ignorance. "Massive state handouts" can be in the form of Energy Saving incentives, incentives to increase medical care, Employer-Provided Child Care Credit, Rehabilitation, Energy and Reforestation Investments Credit, Qualified Research Expenses Credit, Small Employer Pension Plan Startup Costs Credit, Work Opportunity and Welfare-to-Work Expenses Credit.... The list goes on. Are those not laudable things?
AND WHAT DOES THAT HAVE TO DO WITH DEMOCRACY?
And the government does not own health care nor does in own homes, so they aren't under the purview.
AND WHAT DOES THAT HAVE TO DO WITH DEMOCRACY?
And the 1% get richer because they made it to the 1%.... Do you propose restricting people from what they can earn? Not very democratic of you.
AND WHAT DOES THAT HAVE TO DO WITH DEMOCRACY?
Now... What needs to "change drastically" to satisfy you. A well running government should change through evolution, not revolution.