• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Canadian Man Fired for Kicking Woman at Pro-Choice Protest

truthatallcost said:
You didn't get my reference anyway, otherwise you'd have made excuses for it. The Granada pogrom was perpetrated by Muslims against Jews in Spain. I just wanted to see if you'd once again defend Islamic violence at all cost.
Click to expand...


Like I said before, they've got a long way to go before they even get close to the number of deaths caused by the people you so spinelessly defend.
 
truthatallcost said:
The guy from Orlando was a registered Democrat. Nice try.
Click to expand...

Radicalized Islam in large part was a direct response to left leaning Arab nationalist regimes which had controlled countries like Egypt, Syria and Libya. It is extremely conservative.
 
Grand Mal said:
Do you know what 'majority' and 'worldwide' mean?
Click to expand...

Sure. A majority of Muslims support the Democratic party in the United States, and worldwide they support non-conservative parties when living in the West. Are you saying that Muslims vote for political parties that contradict with their core values?
 
Tigerace117 said:
Radicalized Islam in large part was a direct response to left leaning Arab nationalist regimes which had controlled countries like Egypt, Syria and Libya. It is extremely conservative.
Click to expand...

No one would consider the governments you're referring to be left leaning, besides the most extreme Muslim. The people in those countries want Sharia, not secular law. That is the problem.
 
Tigerace117 said:
Like I said before, they've got a long way to go before they even get close to the number of deaths caused by the people you so spinelessly defend.
Click to expand...

If you're capable of staying on topic, they already do kill more people annually in the United States to further their agenda.
 
truthatallcost said:
No one would consider the governments you're referring to be left leaning, besides the most extreme Muslim. The people in those countries want Sharia, not secular law. That is the problem.
Click to expand...

Oh, and the Soviet Union, which sent substantial amounts of weaponry and advisors to help keep those states propped up. But then again, the Soviets were just a buff of “extreme Muslims” right? :roll:

Which ignores the millions of Muslims in the US and elsewhere who have had no problems with secular law, as well as the fact that Arab nationalist states defined themselves by their secular nature for decades.

The problem is that home grown thugs see Muslims as a easy target to use to try and crawl back out from whatever rocks they hid under in 1945.
 
truthatallcost said:
Sure. A majority of Muslims support the Democratic party in the United States, and worldwide they support non-conservative parties when living in the West. Are you saying that Muslims vote for political parties that contradict with their core values?
Click to expand...

Muslims are the most conservative of people. Thats their core value. The only truly conservative states are Muslim. Iran is like where good conservatives go when they die. If Muslims vote Democratic (a big 'if') it's because of the latent bigotry against them in the Republican Party.
 
truthatallcost said:
Your response isn't even remotely related to my comment. You lazily threw up a link that doesn't contradict anything I said....
Click to expand...

You made a claim to try and downplay the number of right wing terrorist attacks. I showed the ignorance of your claim. You desperately tried to hand wave it away.
 
truthatallcost said:
If you're capable of staying on topic, they already do kill more people annually in the United States to further their agenda.
Click to expand...

And annually the usual thugs target innocent Muslims as part of their despicable ideology.
 
truthatallcost said:
Sure. A majority of Muslims support the Democratic party in the United States, and worldwide they support non-conservative parties when living in the West. Are you saying that Muslims vote for political parties that contradict with their core values?
Click to expand...

Because they are not going to vote for parties that actively oppose their presence and identity, that is far more important than alignment of values.
 
I didn't realize this thread was about Muslims.
 
Tigerace117 said:
Oh, and the Soviet Union, which sent substantial amounts of weaponry and advisors to help keep those states propped up. But then again, the Soviets were just a buff of “extreme Muslims” right? :roll:

Which ignores the millions of Muslims in the US and elsewhere who have had no problems with secular law, as well as the fact that Arab nationalist states defined themselves by their secular nature for decades.

The problem is that home grown thugs see Muslims as a easy target to use to try and crawl back out from whatever rocks they hid under in 1945.
Click to expand...

You're all over the map.
1. Straw man
2. What does Arab nationalist states have to do with American Muslims???
3. Get with the times. Even liberal news sources like Politico have began to question why the SPLC spreads paranoia over irrelevant groups like the Klan. The best thing you can do is to disregard what the ADL and SPLC want you to believe on this subject. They aren't trustworthy.
 
truthatallcost said:
You're all over the map.
1. Straw man
2. What does Arab nationalist states have to do with American Muslims???
3. Get with the times. Even liberal news sources like Politico have began to question why the SPLC spreads paranoia over irrelevant groups like the Klan. The best thing you can do is to disregard what the ADL and SPLC want you to believe on this subject. They aren't trustworthy.
Click to expand...

You, being utterly unable to handle reality, are still desperately flailing about.

No, it is not a "straw man"; it is a direct responsible to your laughable claim that countries like Libya, Egypt and Syria weren't run by left wing leaders throughout much of the Cold War, and that that directly contributed to the rise of radicalized Islam as a conservative reaction.

Like I said before, the rise of radicalized Islam is a conservative product born out of the reaction to left wing Arab nationalist regimes. You can shriek about Democrats all you want, as you did earlier in the thread, but it doesn't fly.

Yes, I bet you and your ilk desperately hope that people will start thinking it's just "paranoia". Unfortunately for you, the facts don't support your fantasies.

Ah yes, the poster who spends all his time shrieking about Muslims and Democrats(and sometimes Jews as well) and desperately trying to hand wave away white supremacist atrocities wants people to do the same. What a surprise.....not.
 
Carjosse said:
To the OP everything bad boils down to the evil left and Muslims.
Click to expand...

Nah, that was Coldjoint. Truthatallcosts is a little bit more extensive in his list of boogeymen.
 
I cant believe people get this worked up over politics.
I mean he's a guy, its not like he could ever have an abortion anyways, so whats all the fuss??!!
 
Grand Mal said:
Muslims are the most conservative of people. Thats their core value. The only truly conservative states are Muslim. Iran is like where good conservatives go when they die. If Muslims vote Democratic (a big 'if') it's because of the latent bigotry against them in the Republican Party.
Click to expand...

They vote D for free stuff mal. You know this as well as I do.
 
Carjosse said:
To the OP everything bad boils down to the evil left and Muslims.
Click to expand...

It was a liberal on this thread who wanted to broaden the discussion to include all instances of extremist violence. When I pointed out that Muslims have committed the deadliest extremist driven attacks every year going back to 2015, he vacated the thread. I could have dodged his attempt at diverting the topic of the OP, instead I used it to educate him.
 
truthatallcost said:
It was a liberal on this thread who wanted to broaden the discussion to include all instances of extremist violence. When I pointed out that Muslims have committed the deadliest extremist driven attacks every year going back to 2015, he vacated the thread. I could have dodged his attempt at diverting the topic of the OP, instead.
Click to expand...
Coming from the king of running away from his own threads when he can't justify his false claims, the words pot, kettle and black come flying into my head.
truthatallcost said:
I used it to educate him.
Click to expand...
You're not capable of that.
 
Urethra Franklin said:
Coming from the king of running away from his own threads when he can't justify his false claims, the words pot, kettle and black come flying into my head.

You're not capable of that.
Click to expand...

You're just not a very perceptive person. When I stop responding to you, it's usually because I've answered your point a dozen times, and your unable to accept anyone else's opinion on the subject. You're a nagger, and altogether far too needy for a forum. That explains why you responded out of context to a post that's almost 4 months old.
 
Carjosse said:
Have you not seen the harassment and stalking pro-life protesters put women seeking abortions and doctors through?
Click to expand...

This is true but it's not fair to deflect onto what 'the other side' does, even if we are pro choice. This guy is an extremist and has no business in a public demonstration if he has such a weak hold over his emotions he must resort to violence.
 
truthatallcost said:
When I stop responding to you, it's usually because I've answered your point a dozen times, and your unable to accept anyone else's opinion on the subject.
Click to expand...
Maybe your interlocuteur here felt that about you? However in your case, no, you run away from your own threads when you can't defend your own lies.

truthatallcost said:
You're a nagger, and altogether far too needy for a forum.
Click to expand...

Needy? I stay off DP for months on end since I have a life. Hence only 3510 posts in over 10 years. You? 19996 posts in nowhere near that time. Who's needy?


truthatallcost said:
That explains why you responded out of context to a post that's almost 4 months old.
Click to expand...

I look at the Canada forum about once a year if that, hence I haven't seen many of these threads. What provoked a response was your sheer hypocrisy, to which the response was perfectly in context.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom