- Joined
- Mar 9, 2016
- Messages
- 7,346
- Reaction score
- 1,874
- Location
- Canada / Australia
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Conservative
OK I see your point.
Question: These other transgressions...were they ancient as this is?
To the best of my recollection, some of them were pretty old.
Another Question: How old were the other transgressors when their capital offences took place?
I don't know, but Pierre Lite was 28. That's plenty old enough to know better.
For me, the bottom line is this;
If a male or a female rape or otherwise touch another in a sexual manner after being asked or told to stop...that male or female should be arrested.
Sorry, but no. That's means groping is acceptable if it's only a problem when the groper doesn't cease after being told to. That's simply not reasonable.
However...if a 20-something, spoiled rich kid grabs an ass or something to that effect, and it goes no further...that's life.
Nope. It's a crime. Period.
And if some upidy man or woman make legal accusations over normal sexual advances, and waste tax payers' money on legal fees for such horse****...that person needs to be charged for the total costs of said legal actions.
If you think unwanted groping is "normal sexual advances", I pity the girls you dated.