Well, yes, that's the reason. And if nobody else brought up human rights, it's because they are not using their economic power to drive it. Again, I think we should have human rights conditions baked into ALL our trade agreements, certainly any new ones (old ones may not be able to be opened up and amended without causing a lot of chaos, I would expect).
And just to be clear, no matter where he goes, what he does, what the purpose is, he is ALWAYS there to do what's right to "me" (where and when "me" aligns with the majority of Canadian citizens, who he works for and is ultimately accountable to).
Agreed! We have plenty of human rights fails, and I suspect that's why this government (finally) is working on them. Of course, they get their pushback, the Con community sure was a-flutter about the whole Kahdr affair...but yes, as uncomfortable a process as it is to address those issues, they need to be worked on, and while definitely a work in progress, we're certainly further along that line than the last government got us in 10 years...
Ya, I don't know why China gets a pass ... I mean, it's a nuclear power, and has an enormous economy, and has invested pretty much all over the world, so owns much of it, but you're right, I would support an even handed approach to addressing all the human rights issues in Asia.
But, just because he didn't go off at China isn't going to make me wish he hasn't gone after the Philippines. What's going on there is outrageous - 7,000 deaths in one year, and that's an "at least" figure:
Philippines President Duterte's Drug War One Year on: At Least 7,000 Are Dead, But It's Been 'Successful'
No, stop it, good grief. Stop thinking the world is like "The Rebel" tells you it is.
And if he were, thank goodness we live in a place where our leaders think that standing up for human rights is grandstanding...in other places, like the Philippines, leaders grandstand by committing atrocities, or in America, where their leader grandstands by downplaying human rights. Would you rather that?