Canada on the Brink of Incorporating Islamic Speech Codes

Via ACT! For Canada, below is a warning from a Canadian veteran about Parliament’s legislative initiative to fight “Islamophobia” and “religious discrimination”.

With Prime Minister Justin “Baby Doc” Trudeau at the helm, the Canadian ship of state is steering rapidly towards the European model of Islamophilia, illiberality, and curtailment of civil liberties. Given the unanimous parliamentary vote on the initial measure, I doubt there’s much that can slow it down at this point — even as Donald Trump is set to steer our own ship in the opposite direction.

Click to expand...

At the site you can link to a detailed letter to all members of Parliament. Does anyone realize this is going on?




You are being redirected...

Some of Trump's minions are trying to promote Islamophobia.

Will they be able to install a total ban on Muslims entering the USA?

Lets wait and see what happens in the next 4 years.

Source:- Gates of Vienna

A well known white supremacist blog which has published Fjordman and inspired Anders Brievik.

Lovely.

There's no Muzzie CT to which the OP will not give credence.

shrubnose said:

Some of Trump's minions are trying to promote Islamophobia.

Will they be able to install a total ban on Muslims entering the USA?

Lets wait and see what happens in the next 4 years.

Click to expand...

I'm pretty sure Mr. Trump is no longer proposing to turn away all Muslim aliens who want to immigrate to the U.S. But nothing whatever would prevent Congress from making a law which did exactly that, any time a majority of the American people wanted it to. None of the rights secured by the Constitution of the U.S. apply to aliens who have not yet entered U.S. territory, and the Supreme Court has made very clear that Congress' power to regulate matters of alienage is nearly absolute.

Anyone who wants to label the wish of millions of Americans to defend our country from Islamist savages as "Islamophobia"--a bit of politically correct jargon designed to gull the gullible--is free to prattle that neologism all he wants. Most Americans aren't listening much these days to the Islamists' rear guard.

matchlight said:

I'm pretty sure Mr. Trump is no longer proposing to turn away all Muslim aliens who want to immigrate to the U.S. But nothing whatever would prevent Congress from making a law which did exactly that, any time a majority of the American people wanted it to. None of the rights secured by the Constitution of the U.S. apply to aliens who have not yet entered U.S. territory, and the Supreme Court has made very clear that Congress' power to regulate matters of alienage is nearly absolute.

Anyone who wants to label the wish of millions of Americans to defend our country from Islamist savages as "Islamophobia"--a bit of politically correct jargon designed to gull the gullible--is free to prattle that neologism all he wants. Most Americans aren't listening much these days to the Islamists' rear guard.

Click to expand...

Who is labeling those critical of Islamists, Islamophobes? I'm critical of islamists and I'm not an islamophobe. An islamist is an advocate or supporter of Islamic militancy or fundamentalism. I see criticism from those who may feel a complete ban on ALL muslims entering the US is not ok because they recognise that all Muslims are obviously not Islamists....I don't see people advocating for known islamists to gain entry.

Unless of course you're attempting to equate all Muslims to Islamists.

Serenity said:

Who is labeling those critical of Islamists, Islamophobes? I'm critical of islamists and I'm not an islamophobe. An islamist is an advocate or supporter of Islamic militancy or fundamentalism. I see criticism from those who may feel a complete ban on ALL muslims entering the US is not ok because they recognise that all Muslims are obviously not Islamists....I don't see people advocating for known islamists to gain entry.

Unless of course you're attempting to equate all Muslims to Islamists.

Click to expand...

Of course the problem is not allowing Muslims who are known Islamists to enter our territory, but rather in allowing Muslims who are Islamists without our knowing it to enter. Doing just that got fourteen innocent people murdered in San Bernardino, just to cite one fairly recent example. How many people were murdered, and how many more maimed, by the Chechen Islamists who set off that bomb at the Boston Marathon a couple years before that? None of those rats or their families should ever have been allowed into the U.S. And there have been many other murders by Islamist savages who were allowed to come here from other countries.

Unless there is some reliable way that we have not yet heard about to cull out the bad apples, the safest policy is to exclude almost all of them. A few exceptions might be made for certain highly trained or educated Muslims who would likely benefit this country, if their peaceful nature and commitment to American values could be established by very thorough background checks. No alien, except for accredited diplomats, is entitled to enter U.S. territory--they enter here strictly at the pleasure of the American people. We can exclude an entire group of people, if there is reason to believe that even a small percentage of that group has hostile intentions toward this country.

matchlight said:

Of course the problem is not allowing Muslims who are known Islamists to enter our territory, but rather in allowing Muslims who are Islamists without our knowing it to enter. Doing just that got fourteen innocent people murdered in San Bernardino, just to cite one fairly recent example. How many people were murdered, and how many more maimed, by the Chechen Islamists who set off that bomb at the Boston Marathon a couple years before that? None of those rats or their families should ever have been allowed into the U.S. And there have been many other murders by Islamist savages who were allowed to come here from other countries.

Unless there is some reliable way that we have not yet heard about to cull out the bad apples, the safest policy is to exclude almost all of them. A few exceptions might be made for certain highly trained or educated Muslims who would likely benefit this country, if their peaceful nature and commitment to American values could be established by very thorough background checks. No alien, except for accredited diplomats, is entitled to enter U.S. territory--they enter here strictly at the pleasure of the American people. We can exclude an entire group of people, if there is reason to believe that even a small percentage of that group has hostile intentions toward this country.

Click to expand...

Yes, what better way to protect our Western Values than to contradict them completely.

matchlight said:

I'm pretty sure Mr. Trump is no longer proposing to turn away all Muslim aliens who want to immigrate to the U.S. But

nothing whatever would prevent Congress from making a law which did exactly that,

Click to expand...

any time a majority of the American people wanted it to. None of the rights secured by the Constitution of the U.S. apply to aliens who have not yet entered U.S. territory, and the Supreme Court has made very clear that Congress' power to regulate matters of alienage is nearly absolute.

Anyone who wants to label the wish of millions of Americans to defend our country from Islamist savages as "Islamophobia"--a bit of politically correct jargon designed to gull the gullible--is free to prattle that neologism all he wants. Most Americans aren't listening much these days to the Islamists' rear guard.

Click to expand...

I predict that the1st Amendment to the U.S. Constitution won't be repealed any time soon no matter how many of Trump's minions sign petitions supporting that stupid idea.

:lol:

Wait and see.

If 90 percent of my stolen goods are by green people, then it would make sense to profile against green people.

It's a common trait that has been passed on by our hunter gather days whether we like it or not.

sookster said:

If 90 percent of my stolen goods are by green people, then it would make sense to profile against green people.

It's a common trait that has been passed on by our hunter gather days whether we like it or not.

Click to expand...

Are you implying that 90% of the US crime is commited by muslims?

matchlight said:

I'm pretty sure Mr. Trump is no longer proposing to turn away all Muslim aliens who want to immigrate to the U.S. But nothing whatever would prevent Congress from making a law which did exactly that, any time a majority of the American people wanted it to. None of the rights secured by the Constitution of the U.S. apply to aliens who have not yet entered U.S. territory, and the Supreme Court has made very clear that Congress' power to regulate matters of alienage is nearly absolute.

Anyone who wants to label the wish of millions of Americans to defend our country from Islamist savages as "Islamophobia"--a bit of politically correct jargon designed to gull the gullible--is free to prattle that neologism all he wants. Most Americans aren't listening much these days to the Islamists' rear guard.

Click to expand...

And what happens when people are more interested in defending our country from neofascist scum who are attempting to exploit the actions of a minority of a minority to try and destroy America?

Islamic radicals can't destroy America. They can't even slow her down. But if we allow opportunistic jackals to destroy everything that has made genuinely made America great and replace it with a cut rate version of Mussolini's Italy or Hitler's Germany, that's just pathetic.n

The Gates of Vienna blogsite, as others pointed out, inspired a guy who murdered 77 people and wounded another 309 in the name of this far right extremism bull****.

There's an interesting article on the Battle of Vienna for anyone who's actually listening in learning about history.

https://pando.com/2014/09/12/the-war-nerd-the-day-after-911/

shrubnose said:

Some of Trump's minions are trying to promote Islamophobia.

Will they be able to install a total ban on Muslims entering the USA?

Lets wait and see what happens in the next 4 years.

Click to expand...

I would be very surprised if such a ban were enacted

Crovax said:

Are you implying that 90% of the US crime is commited by muslims?

Click to expand...

You think it is more? :doh

I read the article and still dont know what these islamic speech codes mentioned in the thread title are

I'm curious...to be a Muslim one must believe in one god (called Allah) AND, and this is a major AND, believe that Mohammad is god's prophet, and that everything Mohammad said and did, was sanctioned by god. Muslims must also believe that Mohammad was the example of a perfect man, the most perfect man who ever lived AND seek to emulate his life...that is what makes a good Muslim. Now, following this belief and seeing as Mohammad, who invented Islam, was an Islamist, a fundamentalist who was a liar, a thief, a sex-slave owing, rapist and was a misogynist, paedophile, and a psychotic murderer, how can one be a Muslim, believe in Mohammad and not emulate his life? I mean Mohammad's life is fundamental to Islam...Mohammad IS Islam and yet Muslims claim not to want to follow their prophet. Sorry, makes no sense. Islamists/fundamentalist Muslims do what they do because they are imitating Mohammad's life, as they are supposed to. I have no respect, no time for and absolutely no desire to befriend anyone who knows exactly what Mohammad was like and still chooses to follow him. Because to be a Muslim is to follow Mohammad. It speaks to character. I would never befriend or want anything to do with a person who, knowing what Hitler was like, chooses to admire, respect and follow him. It speaks to their character. I would never befriend or want anything to do with a person who willingly chooses to admire, respect and follow Stalin, or Mao, or Pol Pot or Idi Amin or King Leopold for what he sanctioned in the Congo. They are all the same to me. If Jesus Christ had lived a life like Mohammad did, if he had done what Mohammad did, then I would add Christians to the list too.
There are more people who leave Islam than is generally known, for their safety they are anonymous, or use another name. These people I respect; they learned what Mohammad was like and left Islam.
Anyway, I am sure someone bright spark will say that I am wrong, that Mohammad was really a nice, friendly, wonderful man. IUIs can say what they want. I judge a person by the people they respect, admire and follow.

Crovax said:

Are you implying that 90% of the US crime is commited by muslims?

Click to expand...

Of course not.

CMPancake said:

Yes, what better way to protect our Western Values than to contradict them completely.

Click to expand...

I do not see how it serves any of our Western values to allow Islamic savages into the U.S. so they can murder Americans more easily. If the old Indian religion of Thuggee were still alive, I suppose people who share your view would call it an assault on Western values to exclude its followers from this country. After all, they would say, only the extreme Thugs who took their faith literally ever strangled people and buried them in secret places as a sacrifice to the goddess Kali; and it would be terribly unfair to the majority of non-violent Thugs who considered themselves followers of the faith to keep them from their dream of settling in the U.S. If getting a few dozen Americans garrotted to death now and then were the price of maintaining our Western value of religious tolerance--even when the religion called for true believers to kill people in the name of its god--then that is a price we must pay.

shrubnose said:

I predict that the1st Amendment to the U.S. Constitution won't be repealed any time soon no matter how many of Trump's minions sign petitions supporting that stupid idea.

:lol:

Wait and see.

Click to expand...

Why so coy, with your "lol"? Why do you make only vague references to the First Amendment, instead of making your case? Come ahead and explain to us, specifically, which part of that amendment applies to the issue of denying Muslim aliens entry to U.S. territory, and how. I hope you will try to identify the Supreme Court decisions you think support your assertion and cite the relevant language from them.

Tigerace117 said:

And what happens when people are more interested in defending our country from neofascist scum who are attempting to exploit the actions of a minority of a minority to try and destroy America?

Islamic radicals can't destroy America. They can't even slow her down. But if we allow opportunistic jackals to destroy everything that has made genuinely made America great and replace it with a cut rate version of Mussolini's Italy or Hitler's Germany, that's just pathetic.n

The Gates of Vienna blogsite, as others pointed out, inspired a guy who murdered 77 people and wounded another 309 in the name of this far right extremism bull****.

There's an interesting article on the Battle of Vienna for anyone who's actually listening in learning about history.

https://pando.com/2014/09/12/the-war-nerd-the-day-after-911/

Click to expand...

What does any of your peevish squawk about Hitler, Mussolini, neofascists, etc. have to do with the issue of denying Muslim aliens entry to U.S. territory, or otherwise refusing to kowtow to Islamists as the foolish governments of other nations continue to do?

matchlight said:

What does any of your peevish squawk about Hitler, Mussolini, neofascists, etc. have to do with the issue of denying Muslim aliens entry to U.S. territory, or otherwise refusing to kowtow to Islamists as the foolish governments of other nations continue to do?

Click to expand...

Denying Muslim aliens entry won't stop terrorism, or impact it in any noticeable form. Self radicalization via the Internet has effectively nullified that as a effective option. Besides, people can easily get into this country illegally---especially if they come in from the North, because nobody cares about illegal immigration over the Canadian border.

I suppose you think anything short of tossing every single Muslim in the country into a camp is "kowtowing", however.

Well, we finally know for sure that ColdJoint is a white supremacist.

Abbazorkzog said:

Well, we finally know for sure that ColdJoint is a white supremacist.

Click to expand...

You missed the whole foiled Kansas bombing fiasco didn't you.

Long story short he thinks "it's about time" there were more terrorist attacks on innocent Muslim Americans because "Islam only respects force" and something about an eye for an eye.

He also is vaguely indifferent to the Westboro Baptist Church and their picketing of the funerals of dead soldiers. Appreantly holding up signs saying "Thank God for 9/11" and "Thank God for dead soldiers" only bother him if the carrier is a Muslim.

Tigerace117 said:

Denying Muslim aliens entry won't stop terrorism, or impact it in any noticeable form. Self radicalization via the Internet has effectively nullified that as a effective option. Besides, people can easily get into this country illegally---especially if they come in from the North, because nobody cares about illegal immigration over the Canadian border.

I suppose you think anything short of tossing every single Muslim in the country into a camp is "kowtowing", however.

Click to expand...

I was not discussing any Muslims in this country, although I think it is possible they may one day be interned. That is just what I would expect if, for example, jihadists were ever to attack a U.S. city with a nuclear bomb or biological agent.

matchlight said:

I was not discussing any Muslims in this country, although I think it is possible they may one day be interned. That is just what I would expect if, for example, jihadists were ever to attack a U.S. city with a nuclear bomb or biological agent.

Click to expand...

I highly doubt that, for the simple reason that we are smart enough not to toss people in jail for things other people did.

Or at least some of us are.