• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Obama flubs in guest book, dates visit "2008"

Only you can describe what goes on in your own mind.

Knock of your OWN hackery, haymarket. Reverend's first post, CLEARLY demonstrated his support for this issue being stupid.
 
Moderator's Warning:
If you have an issue with a post, use the report button. Do NOT discuss it publicly.
 
Every one he gets on he trolls and baits. Yet he is never punished the way he punishes others

Every thread could be hijacked by trolls if the debate sunk to the level of accusing other posters of "hyperpartisanship" rather than debating, or ignoring, the issues.

These accusations are intended, I believe, to divert attention from the debate itself, rather than to contribute anything of value.
 
Every thread could be hijacked by trolls if the debate sunk to the level of accusing other posters of "hyperpartisanship" rather than debating, or ignoring, the issues.

These accusations are intended, I believe, to divert attention from the debate itself, rather than to contribute anything of value.

Thats what you do when you have no argument and you do not know how to debate
 
Well, gosh; since you put it that way?

No thanks.

Thanks for admitting you're a big, fat liberal. We knew it anyway.
 
I've defined them quite well. You don't like my definitions because you fit in them.



See, you are running. The topic was presented. Some folks think it was legitimate. Some think it was stupid. So, the latter group explored why the former group thinks the topic is legitimate. I think we've come to some quite accurate conclusions. I suspect that the former group doesn't like being called out on these conclusions.

None of what your saying has anything to do with the topic of this thread. Nada! Zip!

It is trolling and allows you to claim "hyperpartsan" any time you disagree with another poster without adding anything to the debate yourself, just as you're doing here. It's designed as a distraction.

How did a troll ever became a part of the decision making process on these boards?

Can anyone explain?
 
None of what your saying has anything to do with the topic of this thread. Nada! Zip!

It is trolling and allows you to claim "hyperpartsan" any time you disagree with another poster without adding anything to the debate yourself, just as you're doing here. It's designed as a distraction.

How did a troll ever became a part of the decision making process on these boards?

Can anyone explain?

The very fact that there is even a debate about such a minor thing proves CC's point.
 
None of what your saying has anything to do with the topic of this thread. Nada! Zip!

It is trolling and allows you to claim "hyperpartsan" any time you disagree with another poster without adding anything to the debate yourself, just as you're doing here. It's designed as a distraction.

How did a troll ever became a part of the decision making process on these boards?

Can anyone explain?

I know I know!!! He's not a troll. He's a mod who is held in high esteem by some portion of the board, and you're having a meltdown because you don't want to hear what he has to say.

What'd I win, George?
 
I know I know!!! He's not a troll. He's a mod who is held in high esteem by some portion of the board, and you're having a meltdown because you don't want to hear what he has to say.

What'd I win, George?

A: my names not George.

B: you win another partisan post by grant.
 
A: my names not George.

B: you win another partisan post by grant.

Don't you love it though when people go "you are so partisan!!" and then proceed to one up them on the partisanship scale? Its like a spectator sport on this website.
 
I was considering a run for Master of the Universe as all my loyal devoted fans know. But I hate to disappoint all you guys. I made a major error. One beyond all proportions of acceptability even for an amoeba such as myself.

I hang my head low now as I admit to this travesty to this grievous error. All day long this on hump day, the fourth day of the week, Wednesday from dawn to dusk I thought it was the 5th day of the week. Yes folks I thought it was Thursday.


In order to make amends for this error of epic proportions and Universal impacts some of which my never be known I shall throw my self into a pit of vipers. Good bye every one:sinking:
 
I was considering a run for Master of the Universe as all my loyal devoted fans know. But I hate to disappoint all you guys. I made a major error. One beyond all proportions of acceptability even for an amoeba such as myself.

I hang my head low now as I admit to this travesty to this grievous error. All day long this on hump day, the fourth day of the week, Wednesday from dawn to dusk I thought it was the 5th day of the week. Yes folks I thought it was Thursday.


In order to make amends for this error of epic proportions and Universal impacts some of which my never be known I shall throw my self into a pit of vipers. Good bye every one:sinking:

Winston, I officially love you madly. Me love you long time.
 
Not likely. Masters of the Universe is totally gay.
 
Not likely. Masters of the Universe is totally gay.


*note to self: after being resurected by Amazonian warriors send them over to ecofarm's place.
 
Not likely. Masters of the Universe is totally gay.

Not anymore than the thunder cats who have a phallic instrument that grows and shrinks depending on how stimulated it is.
 
The very fact that there is even a debate about such a minor thing proves CC's point.

Fine, then it would run its course quite quickly. The Paul revere thing on another thread is quite minor as well, and that will run its course also. But it should do so without the interjection of "hyperpartisanship' , which adds nothing to the debate.
 
Fine, then it would run its course quite quickly. The Paul revere thing on another thread is quite minor as well, and that will run its course also.

I hope it doesn't run its course quickly. Its like the birther thing, it pays dividends.

But to be fair, the paul revere thing was likely an accidental slip up as well, but then again, I ignored that one too.

But it should do so without the interjection of "hyperpartisanship' , which adds nothing to the debate.

The point being that there should be no debate in the first place, thinking that there is legitimate reason for one is also legitimate reason to use the term in question.

In such a situation, it is legitimate to point out the stupidity of the whole enterprise and that the debate does not need to be added to in the first place.
 
Last edited:
Fine, then it would run its course quite quickly. The Paul revere thing on another thread is quite minor as well, and that will run its course also. But it should do so without the interjection of "hyperpartisanship' , which adds nothing to the debate.


I think the Paul Revere thing gives insight into Palin's way of thinking and her priorities. I don't think flubbing a date gives any insight into a persons way of thinking.
 
I think the Paul Revere thing gives insight into Palin's way of thinking and her priorities. I don't think flubbing a date gives any insight into a persons way of thinking.

This is interesting.
 
I think the Paul Revere thing gives insight into Palin's way of thinking and her priorities. I don't think flubbing a date gives any insight into a persons way of thinking.

Those who don't remember history are doomed to repeat it.
 
None of what your saying has anything to do with the topic of this thread. Nada! Zip!

It is trolling and allows you to claim "hyperpartsan" any time you disagree with another poster without adding anything to the debate yourself, just as you're doing here. It's designed as a distraction.

How did a troll ever became a part of the decision making process on these boards?

Can anyone explain?

Grant... as usual, you prove me correct. You call what Palin did in regards to historical references about Paul Revere, trivial (and they were), yet you have a meltdown and go into full hyperpartisan attack mode over Obama flubbing a date. Thank you. You have proven me 100% correct in regards to your hypocrisy.

What this is about is demonstrating consistency or lack of consistency when discussing issues. Very appropriate to point out in debate. Suggestion. If you don't like being called out on your hypocrisy... DON'T DO IT. Because if you do, I will point it out whenever I see it.
 
Last edited:
Grant... as usual, you prove me correct. You call what Palin did in regards to historical references about Paul Revere, trivial (and they were),


I can actually extrapolate something out of what Palin said. She places a high priority on the Second Amendment for example and that plays into her view of history.

From flubbing a date I can't extrapolate much of anything 'cept maybe the person was pretty damn tired.
 
She places a high priority on the Second Amendment for example and that plays into her view of history.

So - she went ahead and rewrote it? Because the events as she recalls them did not transpire.
 
So - she went ahead and rewrote it? Because the events as she recalls them did not transpire.


None of are perfect all the time. That was just something I heard in here comment and how she prioritized things.
 
Back
Top Bottom