• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Obama flubs in guest book, dates visit "2008"

Me? I didn't claim to know what the Queen thought. I just gave you the truth of the matter, and you somehow decided that the Queen didn't have a problem with it.

You gave me the truth of the matter and yet you don't know what the queen thought?

Did the queen complain at all?
 
Yes. That's what happened. Like I don't spend much of my time defending Obama. Look, if you want to be upset about the "negger" in Schwarzenegger's name, complain to god.


Total Recall, Terminator, Spaceballs, Iberia... it's all there, in afro and white.

What the hell is wrong with you?
 
I was a supporter of state owned industry (Oil company like PetroCan for example), anti death-penalty, pro-abortion, government run health care... you name it... I was for the Commi-Lib line. I was young and dumb... what can I say. I thought it was the best way to organize society. Then the real world arrived.

The transformation to a Conservative took time, but I don't see any reason to accept any of the Commi-Lib positions. Why? They're destructive.

So... I unapologetically poke my finger in the eyes of the Libs for 99.99% of them here aren't reachable by any other means. They're closed minded... hence the link in my signature line. You think any Libs have taken the time to read the free book and look at themselves? Wanna make a bet?

I'm objective, open minded... willing to learn, but nobody has made the case for socialism... quite the opposite. And when Bush 43 spent like a Lib... I was vocal in opposition.

.

You haven't become open minded by any stretch of the imagination, all you've done, is exchange one extreme for the other.
 
You gave me the truth of the matter and yet you don't know what the queen thought?

Did the queen complain at all?

Queens don't complain in public.
 
It wasn't a gaffe, he was trying to hook up. I heard Barbara gave him the go ahead.



See? I do the same thing, doesn't matter what side. I fight nonsense with (funny) nonsense.


But some people get all pissy.
 
Last edited:
There was far more reaction to Bush's breach of protocol when he winked at the Queen and placed his hand on the small of her back.

True enough. The Mayor doesn't recall anyone defending that improiety.

But the lefties are certainly defending their Messiah, aren't they?
 
Not the point. The point is we already have 273 posts with regard to the guestbook, which our member from the UK has stated makes not a hill of beans difference to them.

Here's the Correct Response to that:

Who gives a pile of pure about what non-Americans think, seriously? It's the principle. If Obama was your child, you'd be embarassed to take him to the mal. You wouldn't even want to take him to McDonald's to play on the slides.

Oh and P.S.: That's because he feels all men are worthy of respect.

Unless that man is a businessman earning money to support himself and all his employees.
 
Nah, we have had threads started about Michelle Obama's footware(How dare she have expensive shoes), and how she might have, maybe, possibly put on a couple pounds(how dare she promote healthy living but have party food at a party) and threads about Obama using a teleprompter like every other politician(how dare he use tools). This doesn't even come close to that dumb.

It is still pretty dumb though.



I for one don't think that if a first lady is going to promote healty living/eating that she offer a menu that would reflect that, at least give people a choice, It would show by example how we can move in a different direction when it comes to proccessed foods, sugar, and fried goods. As I said in that thread, she missed an opportunity to promote her noble cause. I'm sorry you find that "dumb".... :shrug:
 
Can't be compared. He can do commonplace and caring with the common. That wasn't a commoner. It was the QUEEN.

Well, unlike othes I could name, Bush is an American and he wasn't raised to have unearned respect of peole born into their positions....(well, tht's essentially how Americans raise their kids....Bushes? Might be slightly different. But he certainly isn't an idiot Wal-Mart clerk swooning over "royalty").

The United States, does however, now have a president who wasn't raised as an American, who learned to bow before his betters, so it's even more egregious that he doesn't know proper protocol.
 
Well, unlike othes I could name, Bush is an American and he wasn't raised to have unearned respect of peole born into their positions....(well, tht's essentially how Americans raise their kids....Bushes? Might be slightly different. But he certainly isn't an idiot Wal-Mart clerk swooning over "royalty").

The United States, does however, now have a president who wasn't raised as an American, who learned to bow before his betters, so it's even more egregious that he doesn't know proper protocol.

This post is hilarious!

I love good satire.
 
Well after all the **** the right had to take from the left, about Bush being a ignorant bumpkin from Texas, and how highly educated, sophisticated, and leg-tinglingly perfect our recent Democrat presidents are (i.e., Clinton and Obama), let us now watch this mythical perfection promoted by the left in action.



I hope our leftwing friends will finally pipedown about Bush.
 
Last edited:
Well, gosh; since you put it that way?

No thanks.
 
Breaking News - Obama misplaces his keys yesterday, further embarrassing the country!!!! :sun
 
You haven't become open minded by any stretch of the imagination, all you've done, is exchange one extreme for the other.
ROTFLOL... Jet... the beauty of letting Libs speak... for I would say I was once exactly like you politically. And you just called yourself an extremist in the process. Since when have you embraced Conservatism in any form?


It's hard to take even one of your replies serious enough...
The beauty of letting folks like you talk, for you reveal who you are. People know I'm a partisan, a Conservative.

You can call my assessment of your regurgitated talking points
What talking points? It's the truth.

I know it's really cool to see the faux passionate theatrics on Fox News and the like
Once again, it's nice to see you reveal who you are.

but when you try to come off the same way in a debate forum, you end up looking ridiculous.
ROTFLOL... I don't get FOX and my ratio of FOX to CNNi is about 1000 to 1... ROTFLOL.

It would be easier to believe that you were actually a Liberal if you didn't rely on the exact type of talking points displayed on the very conservative political commentary shows on Fox News.
Interesting I do, but the arguments are the arguments. Should I invent new ones? ROTFLOL.

Saying "I used to be a Lib, so I'm qualified to talk about it!" is really not that far from a racist asshole saying that he's not racist simply because he has a black friend.
This is too funny. I like your attempt and note its association for what it is. More lameness.

I sincerely hope that at least deep down you realize how ridiculous you sound. I realize that is hoping for a lot.
The fact is I used to be a Commi Lib... I know you don't like it... like most Libs don't. I realize the destructive nature of socialism and the modern Democrat party and its leader... Pierre Trudeau Obama.

.
 
Well after all the **** the right had to take from the left, about Bush being a ignorant bumpkin from Texas, and how highly educated, sophisticated, and leg-tinglingly perfect our recent Democrat presidents are (i.e., Clinton and Obama), let us now watch this mythical perfection promoted by the left in action.



I hope our leftwing friends will finally pipedown about Bush.


There's no hope of that. They'll be overlooking the harms his political policies bring and will be looking instead to the ghosts of Presidents past in attempts to justify his buffoonish behavior today.
 
Last edited:
The beauty of letting folks like you talk, for you reveal who you are. People know I'm a partisan, a Conservative.

And I would possibly be concerned if you weren't such a partisan hack with such a ridiculously skewed viewpoint.


What talking points? It's the truth.

Of course you think they are the truth. You agree with them.

Once again, it's nice to see you reveal who you are.

Oh? Who am I exactly? :lol:

ROTFLOL... I don't get FOX and my ratio of FOX to CNNi is about 1000 to 1... ROTFLOL.

Regardless of where you get your talking points, they are regurgitated.

Interesting I do, but the arguments are the arguments. Should I invent new ones? ROTFLOL.

It's good that you at least crack yourself up.

This is too funny. I like your attempt and note its association for what it is. More lameness.

I agree, it is quite humorous how much of a one-trick pony you are.

The fact is I used to be a Commi Lib... I know you don't like it... like most Libs don't. I realize the destructive nature of socialism and the modern Democrat party and its leader... Pierre Trudeau Obama.

I don't believe that you actually were, but even if it were true I don't care. You are so swept up in the partisan theatrics that you imagine me to be bothered deep down because you think of me as a Liberal and that because of your skewed assessment of Liberals it must be poison to their ears to find out that you claim to have been one before. You are really giving yourself too much credit.
 
I'll tell you exactly what this non-issue is about at its very core and why some on the right are feigning outrage. Most, if not all, on the left mocked Bush and laughed at him for his flubs while he was in office. Some, however, actually displayed this same level feigned outrage by it as if his flubs were the biggest part of the problem and the most worthy of criticism. Each and every single one of them were non-issues and even most of the people on the left knew this. Now that a Liberal is in office, some of the people on the Right who got extraordinarily pissy about the left mocking Bush for his flubs are now mocking Obama and criticizing him for every single thing he does, just as many on the Left did. It's just partisan nonsense back and forth, only this time it happens to be the right winger's turn. If the people on the right who are genuinely disgusted by this non-issue were genuine in their disgust, they would have been just as disgusted by Bush's flubs when he was in office. That is precisely why this is such an absurdly partisan issue to take offense with. Get over it and move on. By feigning outrage, you make yourself look just as ridiculous as the people on the left who were outraged by Bush's flubs. Considering that many Conservatives here think of themselves so highly and feel that they are better than Liberals, you'd think they'd somehow realize this. However, the truth is that both sides have their bottom feeders who will continue to rely solely on their hyper-partisan views and wallow in the mud with the rest of them, while continuing to pretend that they are somehow better than the opposing side.
 
And I would possibly be concerned if you weren't such a partisan hack with such a ridiculously skewed viewpoint.
I am a Conservative. I believe what our Founders left as a contract between the citizens and the government. OK... it's skewed, as are a whole lot of our Founders and the Conservative thinkers like Hobbes that shaped their views... ROTFLOL.

You can have Marx in both small and large doses, I'll take the Founders, Hayek, von Mises, Montesquieu, Friedman and the like.

Of course you think they are the truth. You agree with them.
I embody them.

Oh? Who am I exactly? :lol:
You're obviously hostile to Conservatives. To you they're partisan hacks. The term "partisan hack", or its equally vapid "extreme partisan hack" moniker is intellectual laziness. It reveals the failure to debate. I'd venture it betrays a certain propensity to intolerance.


Regardless of where you get your talking points, they are regurgitated.
"Talking points"... another slide into the cesspool of intellectual laziness.

It's good that you at least crack yourself up.
DP serves a few purposes... like Air America... one is to laugh at Libs.

I agree, it is quite humorous how much of a one-trick pony you are.
I am a Conservative. Shall I drink poison from the Lib chalice to please the Libs? For what reason shall I sell out? To get along? Sorry the price ain't worth it.

I don't believe that you actually were, but even if it were true I don't care.
ROTFLOL. I was young and dumb... like millions of American youth. The difference is I didn't close my mind, and becoming a global nomad helped put the greatness of America in perspective.

You are so swept up in the partisan theatrics that you imagine me to be bothered deep down because you think of me as a Liberal and that because of your skewed assessment of Liberals it must be poison to their ears to find out that you claim to have been one before.
My skewed assessment of Libs? Just look at the damage they have done throughout the world. Are you blind or simply ignorant? Everywhere they have imposed their solutions, failure follows. What is it about freedom, individual rights, ... you know... Liberty, that folks like you find so offensive? For if you embraced these natural rights, you'd have scant argument with my positions. The delivery might not please you... but the substance would.


You are really giving yourself too much credit.
ROTFLOL... if you say so.

.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom