- Joined
- May 19, 2006
- Messages
- 156,720
- Reaction score
- 53,497
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Then I have a question for you, CC. When doctors find a cancerous tumor, why do they seek to remove the whole tumor (if possible) then often follow up with chemotherapy to try to eradicate any remaining cancer cells? If ongoing treatment has such a larger potential for profit, wouldn't it make more sense to leave a few cancer cells behind to assure the need for future treatment?
Medical ethics. Pharmaceutical companies are under no obligation towards these kinds of ethics.
But there is huge profit potential in all three.
All three cannot exist at the same time. Tell me how much profit is there, currently, in the treatment of polio?
Hummmmm, ok, good point.
Good. You see what I'm getting at. The issue isn't profit. The issue is profit without looking at larger issues, also.