actually, they have....the Army had one in Antartica. It was stationary, of course, but could have been adapted.
The Army had one that pinned a soldierto the ceiling, too.
The sun doesn't rise in the east all the time. Sometimes in the northeast, sometimes in the southeast.
In other words, you have nothing.
Much of old green tech is easily implemented using a few bucks and a lot of common sense. I take it you have the bucks, but not the common sense.
The Mayor has more common sense than the average bear.
The Mayor isn't stupid enough to live in the desert where it gets both ridiculously hot and ridiculously cold. The Mayor had enough sense to move to a land cooled by the breezes off the vast Pacific ocean. The Mayor's total gas bill is less than $100 in the winter, unless he's firing up the heater for his pool....and there's no need to run the AC when the cool breezes moderate the hot days...not to mention the swimming pool...
That's what common sense is for. Moving to where nature provides the energy savings without any effort on the Mayor's part whatsoever.
PLOY? so you admit you have no proof other than your opinion.
No, pointing out your debating tricks isn't evidence of any lack on the part of the Mayor.
The fact that the green nonsense has to be subsidized is sufficient evidence that the subsidized technology isn't commercially viable.
You must get ignored a lot.
Yes, whole bunches of people threaten to dig a hole and jump in it so they won't see what the Mayor writes to tear their posts to pieces. That doesn't stop the Mayor from seeing their posts, it doesn't stop the Mayor from responding to their posts, it doesn't stop everyone else from seeing their posts get shredded, but it stops them from adding further nonsense to what was already their ridiculous statements.
Are you going to put the Mayor on "ignore" now?
It isn't raining, so there is no need to fix the leaking roof?
If its not raining, the roof isn't leaking.
It's a "leaky" roof at that point, ie, subject to leaks. "Leaking" indicates an active condition, "leaky" indicates a potential condition.
Does the mayor work at anything? What are your job skills?
The Mayor is the Mayor.
That's self-explanatory.
Construction isn't, I hope. I can only imagine the bad advice you would give your customers.
What you're implying with that ad hominem is that the Mayor isn't aware of means to maximize energy efficiencies in buildings. You're taking the path of personal insult because you need to ignore what the Mayor actually said.
The Mayor said that it's none of your business if a buyer elects to bear the expense of higher energy operating costs to avoid the expense of paying the up-front costs of greater energy efficiency. This is a valid business model for anyone seeking to build commercial structures which will be rented to tenants paying their own utility bills. The free market allows the tenant to shop around and rent space in a more energy friendly environment if he desires, or to operate his business with a higher utility cost that's passed on to his customers.
Regardless, in what is supposed to be a free nation, if you're not putting your name on the lease, it's literally none of your business. Nor is it the any business of any level of government, so long as the contract is honest.
Perhaps you can explain where there are no "small government" moderates? Every alleged or self-proclaimed "moderate" is always wanting to make government bigger, all in the name of interfering in someone else's business.