Brave Colorado woman confronting Lindsey Graham on islam vs 1st Amendment

Ladies and Gentlemen, here is a young Colorado woman named Ann Barnhardt dressing down Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) for advocating on rolling back the First Amendment in order not to anger muslims regarding the Florida pastor's koran burning event. She even challenged Lindsey to come get her for her unusual burning of koran by reading and commenting on pages bookmarked with bacon.

Watch the video by visiting the link below:

Gates of Vienna: The Manifesto of an Evil Totalitarian Political System

dolphinocean said:

Ladies and Gentlemen, here is a young Colorado woman named Ann Barnhardt dressing down Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) for advocating on rolling back the First Amendment in order not to anger muslims regarding the Florida pastor's koran burning event. She even challenged Lindsey to come get her for her unusual burning of koran by reading and commenting on pages bookmarked with bacon.

Watch the video by visiting the link below:

Gates of Vienna: The Manifesto of an Evil Totalitarian Political System

Click to expand...

1) If she wants to burn a koran, she is welcome to do it. The first amendment allows that.

2) Who is talking about rolling back the first amendment? The first amendment already allows people to worship as they please. Sounds like this nutter woman is the one who wants to roll back the first amendment, not Lindsay Graham.

Yeah, cause the First Amendment, was set up, so as to not offend people with words.

I can't take this woman seriously. She essentially said she's one of a very few people in the hemisphere that are both brave and smart. Eat me, sweetcheeks.

Additionally, Graham basically said "it'd be nice" and "I wish we could" when it came to restricting this kind of thing. He didn't say he throwing his weight around to make a change of any kind, he clearly acknowledged any such change would be a pie-in-the-sky effort.

Finally, it might be wise to take General Petraeus' reaction to the aftermath of the Koran burning into account before taking a potshot at Graham for saying essentially the same thing.

Doesn't she know I can reach through my computer screen and strangle her?

After looking at Graham's statement closer, I don't really blame him for it. Like TED said, it was more of a pie in the sky "if not for the constitution" type of thing than real. Its no different to me than many of us saying we'd love to ban the Westboro assholes from doing what they do if we could, but sadly its the price of having our constitution that we have to live with pricks like that.