You've turned into a real ass lately zimmer, the post before this one was unnecessarily insulting. I remember you once told me you were an "idiot lib" once... Basically you were talking about arrogance. Can you step back for a second and see that the only thing which has changed is the political viewpoint you believe in now? The same arrogance is still there.
If that's your opinion... OK. Me and Obama... according to you we have one thing in common... arrogance.
ROTFLOL... you sound like a school teacher. Are you one?
Do you really think politics or anything should be debated that way?
Sometimes yes.
That two sides should make imaging like that, use that kind of language?
I found that cartoon absolutely hilarious when Bell produced it, and he was skewering a guy who's foreign policy I believed was on the money. I think the cartoon is still hilarious, and is a great vehicle to poke the same kind of crap back at the other side. I would have used it regardless of which Dem was elected... I was expecting to have Hillary's head on there. Might have changed the suit to a pantsuit with a flap in the back.
People should be more mature than that, much much more mature, that is not what the word "debate" means.
Steve Bell has made a fine living from being immature I guess. The Guardian must be an immature lot too. Perhaps they are. I don't think Bell is; the remainder I can't speak for as I don't know them.
If you believe Libs here engage in honest debate... think again. It's another reason I left the left. I learned it was one lie stacked upon another. I have little tolerance for liars, and skewering them and their idiotic leadership is part of debate and debating. Not that Obama would ever sink to the level of demeaning his opposition. No... he would never do that.
Im assuming you would agree that anyone has the right to do it without blame or criticism too? I mean if you can use an image of Obama, or any of the other stuff on that link, like that surely I or anyone else could use the same kind against Bush or Palin or any future or past Republican figure?
SURE and ABSOLUTELY!!! Though nothing comes without blame or criticism... that's life! And check out Bell's toons. He made a fine living skewering Bush43. His Bush era stuff is priceless... and Ramirez is another master of his craft.
Is that really what you want politics to be?
You have got to be joking. We have a President that bribed to pass ObamaKare, called a Cop a racist, hires tax cheats, refers to its citizens as "bitter clingers" and "tea baggers"... and you think this is the lower reaches of political discourse? Puh-lease. Interesting you hold a poster on DP to far higher standards than POTUS.
How is that productive at all?
It's funny... it was funny when Bell skewered Bush, and it's funny and more fitting because Obama is literally up to his neck in it. Not everyone will laugh, and some might even be offended. C'est la vie.
Here is productive debate... just in the nick of time a Lib comes through with deep insight that is both hilarious and original to boot!
That's still three times as much brain power as Palin uses.
Phew... now that is hard stuff to debate, to top, and really gets to the heart of the matter, but I'm sure the Libs are doing their collective head-bob and having a few guffaws at the penetrating humor just delivered.
How does that kind of stuff contribute to anything other than someone's ego?
It skewers The One, it juxtaposes Mr. Brilliant with the Crap-o-matic governance he's blessed us with. That's the contribution. I understand Libs won't like it,
and that's part of the fun too. You see, I enjoy having fun... another reason for leaving the brain dead, uptight, overwrought Left.
I was going to post this one first, but wasn't sure it hit on all the cylinders of this thread; the other had done precisely that, much to your dismay I have come to understand.
.