• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Unions threaten Business

Quite true

Which sort of goes to the point that teachers who are part of a union if I recall correctly get paid more then those that are not. After all is not one of the " benifits" of charter schools is that the teachers are paid less, and as such cost less

It also costs more to be in a union but the fact is different parts of the country have a different cost of living. Today IMO unions have outlived their usefulness and no longer are needed. There are laws on the books to protect workers from unsafe working conditions which was the original purpose of unions. I have absolutely no use for unions which I am sure you understand. As stated, IMO, unions protect mediocrity and that destroys quality and incentive.
 
Well excuse me, this thread is about unions so how could I have missed that? Nice diversion
:shock: I have never been in greater disbelief on this board than I am right now.

I made a claim. You asked me to back it up. I backed it up with evidence.
You made a claim. I asked you to back it. You provided no evidence.

You seriously need some help man. No joke.
 
It also costs more to be in a union but the fact is different parts of the country have a different cost of living. Today IMO unions have outlived their usefulness and no longer are needed. There are laws on the books to protect workers from unsafe working conditions which was the original purpose of unions. I have absolutely no use for unions which I am sure you understand. As stated, IMO, unions protect mediocrity and that destroys quality and incentive.

It does cost to be in a union of course, but the main complaint people who do not like unions is that it raises the cost of doing business. Autoworkers in unions generally are better paid then those not in unions, teachers in unions get better paid. Overall for the majorituy of union members they receive more in compensation then those outside of them. Unions today exist to ensure maximum benifits for their members, as such they generally do a good job.
 
:shock: I have never been in greater disbelief on this board than I am right now.

I made a claim. You asked me to back it up. I backed it up with evidence.
You made a claim. I asked you to back it. You provided no evidence.

You seriously need some help man. No joke.

Right, I need some help because of a political thread? I suggest you seek some help because you are going to need it going out into the world with the attitude that you have.
 
It does cost to be in a union of course, but the main complaint people who do not like unions is that it raises the cost of doing business. Autoworkers in unions generally are better paid then those not in unions, teachers in unions get better paid. Overall for the majorituy of union members they receive more in compensation then those outside of them. Unions today exist to ensure maximum benifits for their members, as such they generally do a good job.

Yet non union auto employees continue to get jobs and continue to work while union jobs are being lost as companies cannot compete. What they do is make business non competitive in a world market and that puts added pressure on companies which cannot compete against non union shops. It is all about what the public will buy and it seems that more and more of the public are buying the non union brand. Unions have outlived their usefulness.
 
Yet non union auto employees continue to get jobs and continue to work while union jobs are being lost as companies cannot compete. What they do is make business non competitive in a world market and that puts added pressure on companies which cannot compete against non union shops. It is all about what the public will buy and it seems that more and more of the public are buying the non union brand. Unions have outlived their usefulness.

I really don't put 100% of the blame on private sector unions...it takes two to tango. I think that far too many CEO's looked at their stock options and wanted smooth-sailing negotiations...some of them giving up the store to the unions in order to git 'er done. GM would be a classic example of this, in my opinion. Why on earth did management agree to job banks? The union contract called for 42 months of unemployment benefits + a GM spiff to bring "layed off" employees to within 95% of their working pay. What on earth?? Why would a company agree to this? Their stockholders should have skinned them alive.

One of the benefits negotiated by the United Auto Workers was the jobs bank program, under which laid-off members received 95 percent of their take-home pay and benefits. More than 12,000 UAW members were paid this benefit in 2005.[21] In December 2008, the UAW agreed to suspend the program as a concession to help U.S. automakers during the auto industry crisis.
United Auto Workers - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

But then we have the union side of things. Their greed is only usurped by management's stupidity....or maybe their self-serving motives which have nothing to do with what's best for the company.
 
Look, I don't care if you work for a union or not, obviously you need it as you apparently don't have the initiative or drive to make it on your own, so be it. Where is your proof that I labor under a false assumption. Ever deal with OCAW? Ever have a union thug throw a lit cigarette at a tanker truck you were driving in? Ever have someone shoot at you also while in a fully loaded tanker? Ever have an employer throw a punch at you for questioning why the protests?

Your cup is always half empty and never accept personally responsibility for anything. Of course there are employers out there that take advantage of employees just like there are union employees that take advantage of their employer so what is your point? What is wrong with keeping your job based upon performance? What is wrong with getting an education on that job and then selling your services to the highest bidder? Why do you need a union to negotiate for you? Are you afraid to compete on your own merits? Weren't you looking for a job when you found the one you got?

There are some very good union employees and I have seen union employees leave the union and become managers making more than they ever made in the union. How can that be?
obviously you do care, as it seems to stick in your crawl when i defend union membership. as for the bulk of the rest of your post, you know nothing about me, so, where do you get off making assumptions about me? more of your bs....as for the rest, there is nothing wrong with getting an 'education ' as you put it, and if you can find better pay and benefits outside of a union shop so be it, i've no problem with that. i like working in a union shop, that is my preference, as i have worked in union and non union shops....you seem to think it is a sign of weakness, but yet admit that employers do take advantage of employees...???? the company has lawyers and accountants working for them, by pooling my resources with my co-workers, and by belonging to a union, i'm in a better posistion to better my pay and benefits when negotiating, as we have access to lawyers and accountants...i believe a couple of other posters have already gone over this...so, why is it bad for me to belong to a union? why is it so wrong to like having a contract, spelling out exactly what i can expect in pay and benefits? why are you ok with company execs having contracts, but not me? seems to me my production manager, my plant manager, my process techs, like having a contract with the company, that spells out what is expected from them, and what in return they can expect from the company...why is it so wrong if i want the same for me and my co-workers?
 
Look, I don't care if you work for a union or not, obviously you need it as you apparently don't have the initiative or drive to make it on your own, so be it. Where is your proof that I labor under a false assumption. Ever deal with OCAW? Ever have a union thug throw a lit cigarette at a tanker truck you were driving in? Ever have someone shoot at you also while in a fully loaded tanker? Ever have an employer throw a punch at you for questioning why the protests?

Your cup is always half empty and never accept personally responsibility for anything. Of course there are employers out there that take advantage of employees just like there are union employees that take advantage of their employer so what is your point? What is wrong with keeping your job based upon performance? What is wrong with getting an education on that job and then selling your services to the highest bidder? Why do you need a union to negotiate for you? Are you afraid to compete on your own merits? Weren't you looking for a job when you found the one you got?

There are some very good union employees and I have seen union employees leave the union and become managers making more than they ever made in the union. How can that be?
as for the lit cigarette, and for having someone shoot at you, i only have your word for this, and i would ask, what was your role in this supposed confrontation? this is something that you can't back up on an internet forum without giving personal info....so, why bring it up? other than to smear unions?
 
Yet non union auto employees continue to get jobs and continue to work while union jobs are being lost as companies cannot compete. What they do is make business non competitive in a world market and that puts added pressure on companies which cannot compete against non union shops. It is all about what the public will buy and it seems that more and more of the public are buying the non union brand. Unions have outlived their usefulness.

It has nothing to due whether or not the company is unionized. Most german companies are unionized and sell products quite well in the US. It is more the management and how competent they are. If they allow their automotive engineers and designers to produce cars the public wants. Those engineers and designers are non unionized and have done a very poor job in the US auto companies for a few decades
 
obviously you do care, as it seems to stick in your crawl when i defend union membership. as for the bulk of the rest of your post, you know nothing about me, so, where do you get off making assumptions about me? more of your bs....as for the rest, there is nothing wrong with getting an 'education ' as you put it, and if you can find better pay and benefits outside of a union shop so be it, i've no problem with that. i like working in a union shop, that is my preference, as i have worked in union and non union shops....you seem to think it is a sign of weakness, but yet admit that employers do take advantage of employees...???? the company has lawyers and accountants working for them, by pooling my resources with my co-workers, and by belonging to a union, i'm in a better posistion to better my pay and benefits when negotiating, as we have access to lawyers and accountants...i believe a couple of other posters have already gone over this...so, why is it bad for me to belong to a union? why is it so wrong to like having a contract, spelling out exactly what i can expect in pay and benefits? why are you ok with company execs having contracts, but not me? seems to me my production manager, my plant manager, my process techs, like having a contract with the company, that spells out what is expected from them, and what in return they can expect from the company...why is it so wrong if i want the same for me and my co-workers?

I quite frankly don't care if you belong to a union as you have no impact on me, my family, or anyone else but yourself. If your union runs your business out of business like it has others, then you have no one else to blame for losing your job but yourself and your union.

There is a reason for declining union membership, why don't you tell me what that is? You love the security that a union provides you but to think that they are maximizing your pay and benefits is simply your opinion. If you don't think enough of yourself and your ability then you are better off living in a union shop and getting whatever the union thinks you deserve. I had a lot more desire, ability, and initiative that apparently you have but to each their own.
 
It has nothing to due whether or not the company is unionized. Most german companies are unionized and sell products quite well in the US. It is more the management and how competent they are. If they allow their automotive engineers and designers to produce cars the public wants. Those engineers and designers are non unionized and have done a very poor job in the US auto companies for a few decades

I will give you that for as Maggie stated, there are some very stupid management employees that sold their companies out and as a result opened the door for foreign companies to get a foothold here. The market decides what they want to buy and based upon the financial results it wasn't GM/Chrysler but instead they are buying Toyota and Honda.
 
as for the lit cigarette, and for having someone shoot at you, i only have your word for this, and i would ask, what was your role in this supposed confrontation? this is something that you can't back up on an internet forum without giving personal info....so, why bring it up? other than to smear unions?

My role was to help direct non union drivers in the delivery of their product so the motoring public could get to and from work while union employees were on strike. Union thugs represent you well.
 
I will give you that for as Maggie stated, there are some very stupid management employees that sold their companies out and as a result opened the door for foreign companies to get a foothold here. The market decides what they want to buy and based upon the financial results it wasn't GM/Chrysler but instead they are buying Toyota and Honda.

Two companies that were far better managed then those in the US. They designed and engineered cars consumers wanted. To do so they used non union employees. The US automakers using non union engineers and designers were unable to. German car companies using non union engineers and designers, but union factory workers were able to build engineer and design cars the US consumer wanted
 
I quite frankly don't care if you belong to a union as you have no impact on me, my family, or anyone else but yourself. If your union runs your business out of business like it has others, then you have no one else to blame for losing your job but yourself and your union.

There is a reason for declining union membership, why don't you tell me what that is? You love the security that a union provides you but to think that they are maximizing your pay and benefits is simply your opinion. If you don't think enough of yourself and your ability then you are better off living in a union shop and getting whatever the union thinks you deserve. I had a lot more desire, ability, and initiative that apparently you have but to each their own.
actually, uaw membership is up 6%:mrgreen:

UAW membership up 6 percent | detnews.com | The Detroit News

you seem to think that every plant that went out of business and happened to be unionized, that this was the fault of the union....i suspect you know better than this, and if you were to think logically about this, you would figure out that it just isnt so. as for your 'personal' story, i could care less, if you were happy doing what you did, good for you, but your personal 'experiences' mean nothing to me.
 
Two companies that were far better managed then those in the US. They designed and engineered cars consumers wanted. To do so they used non union employees. The US automakers using non union engineers and designers were unable to. German car companies using non union engineers and designers, but union factory workers were able to build engineer and design cars the US consumer wanted

One of the great things about this country is that the consumer decides what they want and who they buy from. That may or may not be union goods but since unions are a very small percentage of the private work force it looks to me like the consumer has spoken.
 
I like working in a union shop, that is my preference, as i have worked in union and non union shops....you seem to think it is a sign of weakness, but yet admit that employers do take advantage of employees...???? The company has lawyers and accountants working for them, by pooling my resources with my co-workers, and by belonging to a union, i'm in a better posistion to better my pay and benefits when negotiating, as we have access to lawyers and accountants...i believe a couple of other posters have already gone over this...so, why is it bad for me to belong to a union? why is it so wrong to like having a contract, spelling out exactly what i can expect in pay and benefits? why are you ok with company execs having contracts, but not me? seems to me my production manager, my plant manager, my process techs, like having a contract with the company, that spells out what is expected from them, and what in return they can expect from the company...why is it so wrong if i want the same for me and my co-workers?

Excuse me for butting in, but I wanted to put in my two cents. IMO, there is nothing wrong with belonging to a private sector union. Unions are held in check with their demands by the profitability of the company itself. No sense in killing the goose that lays the golden eggs, so to speak.

Do they serve a useful purpose? I think many times they do. Do they often go overboard? I think many times they do. But! What I think it does is encourage mediocrity. That's an awful thing to encourage! Just do your job, put in your time, and you'll get your raise. Put in any extra? You're liable to actually make enemies of your co-workers. Is that not true? It certainly was when I belonged to the IBEW for a short time in Chicago. That from personal experience. Then they've got this gol-darned work rules. Maybe they all don't have them, but my union did.

I was an Information Operator for about 8 months. I was eager to be promoted. Best damned operator they had, if I don't say so myself. ;) Personnel called me into the office and told me that I was destined for the business office...but I had to be with the company for two years before I could be promoted...union rules. I quit.

Making enemies of co-workers is what would happen to my mom when she worked on piece work for Sunbeam Corporation. They had this gimmick that you had a quota -- let's say 100 pieces an hour -- and for that you made a "base rate." You could make 150 pieces an hour and get paid base rate times 1.5. If you made more than 150 pieces, even though my mom found it easy to do, co-workers shunned her for getting the job re-rated. What??? Why was the job rated at all, you ask. Union rules.

Chicago lost a significant % of its trade shows/exhibitors several years ago because..why? Ridiculous union rules. Have a display that needs to be plugged into an electrical outlet? You can't plug it in -- You need two electricians, minimum charge $200. That's just one ridiculous example. Here are some concessions recently agreed to by the unions involved because so many of their workers were layed off:

"Work begun from 6 to 8 a.m. will be billed as straight time (not time-and-a-half or double time as previously) across all union jurisdictions.
" Exhibitors of all sizes will be allowed to hang signs and plug in equipment without hiring union labor.
" Union crew sizes will be determined on a job-by-job basis, eliminating the required minimum of three union workers.

When you read posters' harranging about unions, ridiculous examples like this are the reason. IMO, unions have gone overboard. And management's let them. When unions go overboard, jobs are lost. Pure and simple.
 
actually, uaw membership is up 6%:mrgreen:

UAW membership up 6 percent | detnews.com | The Detroit News

you seem to think that every plant that went out of business and happened to be unionized, that this was the fault of the union....i suspect you know better than this, and if you were to think logically about this, you would figure out that it just isnt so. as for your 'personal' story, i could care less, if you were happy doing what you did, good for you, but your personal 'experiences' mean nothing to me.

Yet BLS says union membership is down, guess the Detroit Times better tell the Bureau of Labor Statistics they have it wrong.
 
My role was to help direct non union drivers in the delivery of their product so the motoring public could get to and from work while union employees were on strike. Union thugs represent you well.
not exactly what i was asking...did you instigate any of these incident? did you have a role in the supposed 'confrontation'? either way, true or not, why bring up something that can't be proven on an internet forum, at least without exposing private info?
 
Yet BLS says union membership is down, guess the Detroit Times better tell the Bureau of Labor Statistics they have it wrong.
detroit times? wasnt aware that there was a paper called that...believe what you want, my union's membership is up, whether you like it or not.
 
actually, uaw membership is up 6%:mrgreen:

UAW membership up 6 percent | detnews.com | The Detroit News

you seem to think that every plant that went out of business and happened to be unionized, that this was the fault of the union....i suspect you know better than this, and if you were to think logically about this, you would figure out that it just isnt so. as for your 'personal' story, i could care less, if you were happy doing what you did, good for you, but your personal 'experiences' mean nothing to me.

Want to know why? Because plants are hiring. This isn't about unions attracting people to unions. This is about the auto industry picking up. This is an example of evil corporations making more jobs. And one more thing: It's about the UAW having given a series of concessions over the last several years that's brought GM (in particular) labor costs down.
 
not exactly what i was asking...did you instigate any of these incident? did you have a role in the supposed 'confrontation'? either way, true or not, why bring up something that can't be proven on an internet forum, at least without exposing private info?

I was sitting in the passenger side of the cab of the truck and were returning to the rack to load for another delivery. I don't care whether you believe it or not as I know what happened and I wasn't alone. It happened all over the country.

Here are the most recent stats on Unions

Union Members Summary
For release 10:00 a.m. (EST) Friday, January 21, 2011 USDL-11-0063

Technical information: (202) 691-6378 * cpsinfo@bls.gov * Current Population Survey (CPS)
Media contact: (202) 691-5902 * PressOffice@bls.gov


UNION MEMBERS -- 2010


In 2010, the union membership rate--the percent of wage and salary workers who were
members of a union--was 11.9 percent, down from 12.3 percent a year earlier, the U.S.
Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. The number of wage and salary workers be-
longing to unions declined by 612,000 to 14.7 million. In 1983, the first year for
which comparable union data are available, the union membership rate was 20.1 per-
cent, and there were 17.7 million union workers.

Highlights from the 2010 data:

--The union membership rate for public sector workers (36.2 percent) was
substantially higher than the rate for private sector workers (6.9 percent).
(See table 3.)

--Workers in education, training, and library occupations had the highest
unionization rate at 37.1 percent. (See table 3.)

--Black workers were more likely to be union members than were white, Asian,
or Hispanic workers. (See table 1.)

--Among states, New York had the highest union membership rate (24.2 percent)
and North Carolina had the lowest rate (3.2 percent). (See table 5.)
 
Last edited:
Want to know why? Because plants are hiring. This isn't about unions attracting people to unions. This is about the auto industry picking up. This is an example of evil corporations making more jobs. And one more thing: It's about the UAW having given a series of concessions over the last several years that's brought GM (in particular) labor costs down.
you are partially correct...it is also because the uaw has had success in unionizing non-automotive jobs such as casino workers.
 
Want to know why? Because plants are hiring. This isn't about unions attracting people to unions. This is about the auto industry picking up. This is an example of evil corporations making more jobs. And one more thing: It's about the UAW having given a series of concessions over the last several years that's brought GM (in particular) labor costs down.

Exactly and in addition Ford got ahead of the game and generated some concessions prior to the GM/Chrysler Fiasco and did much better financially.
 
I was sitting in the passenger side of the cab of the truck and were returning to the rack to load for another delivery. I don't care whether you believe it or not as I know what happened and I wasn't alone. It happened all over the country.

Here are the most recent stats on Unions

Union Members Summary
For release 10:00 a.m. (EST) Friday, January 21, 2011 USDL-11-0063

Technical information: (202) 691-6378 * cpsinfo@bls.gov * Current Population Survey (CPS)
Media contact: (202) 691-5902 * PressOffice@bls.gov


UNION MEMBERS -- 2010


In 2010, the union membership rate--the percent of wage and salary workers who were
members of a union--was 11.9 percent, down from 12.3 percent a year earlier, the U.S.
Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. The number of wage and salary workers be-
longing to unions declined by 612,000 to 14.7 million. In 1983, the first year for
which comparable union data are available, the union membership rate was 20.1 per-
cent, and there were 17.7 million union workers.
i know how the game is played with you...i will ignore your source as you ignore mine....perhaps if you actually read my post, you would have noticed something.
 
Exactly and in addition Ford got ahead of the game and generated some concessions prior to the GM/Chrysler Fiasco and did much better financially.
but how can that be? those damn evil unions are only interested in running a company out of business.....:roll:
 
Back
Top Bottom