- Joined
- Jun 23, 2009
- Messages
- 133,631
- Reaction score
- 30,937
- Location
- Bagdad, La.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
reaganomics didn't trickle down on anyone, it pissed on most of them.
Where do you work?
reaganomics didn't trickle down on anyone, it pissed on most of them.
Where do you work?
for a bank. you?
What do banks do?
I work in the oilfield. No mor money trickling down from me, thanks to your boy. I used to trickle down 50 grand, or so a year, but not anymore.
So, why did anyone think it was a good idea to kill jobs?
Yeah.. not really. I'll tell you i'm in IL.
I will have to backtrack on the 150k. Apparently those were the principal's of the school. However, this is straight salary for 9 months, not counting benefits.
Salary: $45,801
Position: Elementary Teacher
Full/Part Time: Fulltime
Years Teaching: 2
Position: Elementary Teacher
Years Teaching: 15
Full/Part Time: Fulltime
Salary: $80,369
Salary: $104,066
Position: Elementary Teacher
Full/Part Time: Fulltime
Years Teaching: 34
reaganomics didn't trickle down on anyone, it pissed on most of them.
So move to North Dakota, lots of oil field activity going on
The idea behind Reaganomics is that deregulation would allow the economy to soar, instead it allowed greed in Wall Street to bust our economy causing the greatest recession (job killer) since the Great Depression.
As to why anyone would think that was a good idea, beats the hell out of me. And the kicker is, some still do! Can you believe that???
So, when Obama killed jobs, that didn't have a negative effect on things?
Reaganomics caused the recession that killed the jobs. The number of poor in America was already at 1 in 7 in 2009 according to the 2010 Census.
Here is the before and after jobs picture:
msnbc.com business - New jobless claims rise unexpectedly
Nah...your impotent rage is still stuck on the Reagan years. Pathetic.
Anyone who is not enraged over the effects of Reaganomics (Slashing of top tax rates and deregulation) over the last 3 decades has not been paying attention:
Anyone that insists that a dead president that was elected from 1980-1988 did what you claim (in spite of the fact that congress does and always has controlled the legislature and ignoring 22 years of presidencies and elected representation since) is either a moron or blinded by ideological hatred.
Edit...BTW...your chart didnt show the congressional spending from 2007 to current...I wonder what it would look like when a democrats controlled house, senate and then white house got in power...oh...but that is all still Reaganomics...right? Its not irresponsible republicans and democrats spending their ass off without regard to debt. Damn those democrats for enacting Reaganomics!!!
ideologues...:lamo
Reaganomics, taxes slashed for the top 1% and deregulation, did not die with Reagan unfortunately. It has been carried on by both parties to the detriment of the middle class and our nation as a whole.
:lamo
Thats why I love people like you. Reagan still controls the cosmos. Bush was such an incredible incompetent moron, yet he completely owned democrats for 8 years. Its ALWAYS someone else. Theres always a label that you can slap on it and blame any and every one but yourselves...your elected representatives...the people you support. Its ALWAYS someone elses fault you fail...someone elses fault you cant succeed.
Its not about reagan himself, its the failed trickle down theory and deregulation over the last 30 years that's brought us to where we are. So we should continue along the path just waiting to be trickled on?
No thank you!
Chew on that for a while...the last 30 years...golly...you would think a few dem politicians might change the world. :roll:
The economic environment has been and is still in place for people to succeed. It doesnt come by rolling over on your back and waiting for someone to provide for you. It isnt going to happen waiting for the federal government to spend us all into oblivion. People come to this country with nothing and succeed. For some reason...others just 'cant.' I wonder why.
Reaganomics caused the recession that killed the jobs. The number of poor in America was already at 1 in 7 in 2009 according to the 2010 Census.
Here is the before and after jobs picture:
msnbc.com business - New jobless claims rise unexpectedly
Do you have proof or are you on another, unsubstantiated, politically biased, diatribe again?
Do you mean in addition to what I have already provided here from the 2010 Census:
About 43.6 million people were poor last year in the United States.
And here from BLS 2/5/10, Office of the Speaker:
And here, from the U.S. National Debt Clock:
That is not evidence that "Reagonomics" has done anything, it is just a graph of debt and jobs, alone.
Since 1981 our economy and the middle class have gone downhill, and you suggest going in the same direction. Brilliant plan! :sun