Ah yes, that's James O'Keefe you are talking about, right? It's not? But he did the same thing. Why did you support him misrepresenting himself, and editing a conversation he had at an ACORN office to make it look like a crime had been committed, when it hadn't? Why did you support Andrew Breitbart editing a speech that Shirley Sherrod had made in order to make her look like a racist, which she isn't?
You see, this kind of crap works both ways. I see many on the right supporting these kinds of actions when it's against their opponents on the left, but when it's done to them by the opposition, the faux rage is unbelievable. And yea, the Liberals do the same. So, I have one question to ask. No, make that two, one for the Liberals and another for the Conservatives:
1) To the Conservatives: When are you going to repudiate O'Keefe and Breitbart, and stop supporting him?
2) To the Liberals: When are you going to repudiate what was done to Governor Walker, and stop supporting that?
Come on, folks. You can't have one standard for yourself, and another standard for your opponents. Those who do this kind of crap, are either scumbags who deserved to be shunned by all, or they are heroes to be supported and adored. You can't have it both ways, where some are heroes and others are goats, depending on whether he is a Democrat or Republican. That's hyperpartisan BS. But, in the end, I am sure that some are going to tell me that what I am posting is BS, and explain to me the circumstances in which they CAN have it both ways, and how it's only right that SOME people who do this are heroes, and others are goats, depending on political affiliation. Believe me. I DO want to hear this, just for the LULZ I will get from it. So who wants to go first? :mrgreen:
In short, if you supported your own people doing crap like this, then just STFU when it's the other way around.