• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

First Lady's Office Holds ‘Listen Only’ and 'Invitation Only' Conference Calls for Re

Re: First Lady's Office Holds ‘Listen Only’ and 'Invitation Only' Conference Calls fo

Fixed it for ya. ;)

Nah, she was in no ways a second president.
 
Re: First Lady's Office Holds ‘Listen Only’ and 'Invitation Only' Conference Calls fo

So you loved Babs, then.

To tie this all together...know who Barbara Bush said she admired among first ladies? Clinton and the way she protected her daughter from the media.
 
Re: First Lady's Office Holds ‘Listen Only’ and 'Invitation Only' Conference Calls fo

When Michelle looks serious, though, I'm afraid she's going to punch me in mah face. :lol:

I hear what you're saying though. I can see how people would prefer the "real" image rather than the perpetual smile.

Yeah.. She got that strong body type/personality where you know she could bring on a serious ass kicking.lol. I love it about her:)
 
Re: First Lady's Office Holds ‘Listen Only’ and 'Invitation Only' Conference Calls fo

To tie this all together...know who Barbara Bush said she admired among first ladies? Clinton and the way she protected her daughter from the media.

I admire Hillary for that, too. Chelsea was treated like **** at times.
 
Re: First Lady's Office Holds ‘Listen Only’ and 'Invitation Only' Conference Calls fo

But she was like your friends angry old grandma who would yell at you for walking on her lawn. You didn't like her, but you wouldn't say anything that she might hear for fear that she'd kill your dog.

"Kids! Get the hell off my lawn now!":lol:
 
Re: First Lady's Office Holds ‘Listen Only’ and 'Invitation Only' Conference Calls fo

"Kids! Get the hell off my lawn now!":lol:

Clint Eastwood is your friends Grandma?
 
Re: First Lady's Office Holds ‘Listen Only’ and 'Invitation Only' Conference Calls fo

To tie this all together...know who Barbara Bush said she admired among first ladies? Clinton and the way she protected her daughter from the media.

Not to get all serious but the beating and making fun of that grown adults did to Chelsea? So was not cool. And I thought Hillary handled all that with class and dignity all the while knowing how to put people in check in reguards to messing with her child.

Not all women can pull that off and keep their cool. I could not have as I woulda went all crazy Mama Ghetto Grizzly on anybody and everybody:2razz:
 
Re: First Lady's Office Holds ‘Listen Only’ and 'Invitation Only' Conference Calls fo

Hey look, straw man. Guess what I never said? I said this whine and the thread on her weight where retarded. Nice try, but dishonesty won't get you very far.

Awww, look at you LIE more.

Seems to be almost a concerted effort by some on the right to smear the first lady. Between this and the "Michelle Obama is putting on weight(with no evidence it is true) and is promoting healthy eating so she is a hypocrite", we have some really retarded attacks going on all at once. Coincidence?

I present to you, my humble forum goers, more proof Redress is dishonest, hyper-partisan and frankly I'm a bit sick of it. Redress Trolls a thread, Redress insults the posters, Redress gets called out and plays semantics games and hopes no one puts 2 and 2 together.

Now how about you stay on topic, with the OP and quit insulting everyone that disagrees with you on how the FLOTUS should be treated according to her actions.
 
Re: First Lady's Office Holds ‘Listen Only’ and 'Invitation Only' Conference Calls fo

Awww, look at you LIE more.



I present to you, my humble forum goers, more proof Redress is dishonest, hyper-partisan and frankly I'm a bit sick of it. Redress Trolls a thread, Redress insults the posters, Redress gets called out and plays semantics games and hopes no one puts 2 and 2 together.

Now how about you stay on topic, with the OP and quit insulting everyone that disagrees with you on how the FLOTUS should be treated according to her actions.

How about you try to learn how to read and refrain from calling out a mod as a troll. It is rule breaker. You got a problem with a mod? Take it private. Just a suggestion.

BTW, not sure you are making any point here as there is nothing dishonest about it. Your attempt to make someone out as a liar (among other things) is a big fat FAIL.
 
Re: First Lady's Office Holds ‘Listen Only’ and 'Invitation Only' Conference Calls fo

How about you try to learn how to read and refrain from calling out a mod as a troll. It is rule breaker. You got a problem with a mod? Take it private. Just a suggestion.

BTW, not sure you are making any point here as there is nothing dishonest about it. Your attempt to make someone out as a liar (among other things) is a big fat FAIL.

Aww a Very Liberal Poster kissing up tot he Very Liberal Mod. Shocking!

Look, redress came into the thread, off topic and attacking, Redress then insinuated that this thread, anothers like it were retarded. When called out Redress claimed Redress wasn't calling this thread retarded.

You can play the spin all you want, facts is facts.
 
Re: First Lady's Office Holds ‘Listen Only’ and 'Invitation Only' Conference Calls fo

Aww a Very Liberal Poster kissing up tot he Very Liberal Mod. Shocking!

Look, redress came into the thread, off topic and attacking, Redress then insinuated that this thread, anothers like it were retarded. When called out Redress claimed Redress wasn't calling this thread retarded.

You can play the spin all you want, facts is facts.

You should know by now I kiss no ass but she is not a liar and I did take offense at her using the R Word! I am not trying to spin a damn thing. Just saying Red not a liar. And saying that calling mods down uptairs can get you in trouble. That is all.

So carry on but refrain from saying I kiss up to anybody as this is not true.. Again carry on and whateva.

BTW, if up to me? Nobody would be saying anything about the R word as it is would be banned! It does bother me and it needs to stop but I do not think that the real issue here and since when have you gave a crap about the R Word? Just wondering.
 
Last edited:
Re: First Lady's Office Holds ‘Listen Only’ and 'Invitation Only' Conference Calls fo

Awww, look at you LIE more.



I present to you, my humble forum goers, more proof Redress is dishonest, hyper-partisan and frankly I'm a bit sick of it. Redress Trolls a thread, Redress insults the posters, Redress gets called out and plays semantics games and hopes no one puts 2 and 2 together.

Now how about you stay on topic, with the OP and quit insulting everyone that disagrees with you on how the FLOTUS should be treated according to her actions.

Wait...since I said exactly what I claimed to say, and not what you claimed I said, I am dishonest? Keep up that quality posting.
 
Re: First Lady's Office Holds ‘Listen Only’ and 'Invitation Only' Conference Calls fo

Wait...since I said exactly what I claimed to say, and not what you claimed I said, I am dishonest? Keep up that quality posting.

Liar Liar Pants on Fire! Dirty Poster You! :2razz::lamo;)
 
Re: First Lady's Office Holds ‘Listen Only’ and 'Invitation Only' Conference Calls fo

Wait...since I said exactly what I claimed to say, and not what you claimed I said, I am dishonest? Keep up that quality posting.

You said this thread, and others like it, critical of the First Lady are retarded.

Quality posting that adds to the discussion.

When called on it you claimed that you were talking about the OTHER thread, where clearly you were not.
 
Re: First Lady's Office Holds ‘Listen Only’ and 'Invitation Only' Conference Calls fo

You said this thread, and others like it, critical of the First Lady are retarded.

Quality posting that adds to the discussion.

When called on it you claimed that you were talking about the OTHER thread, where clearly you were not.

No, I stated that the topic of this thread and the other one critical of the first lady are retarded. The issue is not complaining about what the first lady did, it was complaining about these specific things. If the first lady was eating babies, or pushing euthanasia, or whatever(you know, legitimate things to complain about, not the fact she passed out information over a phone), that would be a legitimate thing to complain about.

Instead of defending your comments, you had to instead make up **** that you wanted me to have said, and even when having the exact words pointed out to you, persisted in your dishonest portrayal of my words. When you can't argue your points, you build straw men and argue against them.
 
Back
Top Bottom