• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Rachel Maddow Falls for Fake Story About Conservatives and Sarah Palin

Yes, she reported a fake story, but The Blaze spun their reporting saying she was mocking conservatives (in general) and Sarah Palin. She never mentions conservative AND she specifically said that this had nothing to do with Sarah Palin herself. She actually did better reporting on a fake story than The Blaze (Glenn Beck) did on the real story.
So the facts were completely false, but the reporting was good so that's good enough for you. Now, if it had been Glenn Beck who did this, I'm sure you'd give him the same pass, fair guy that you are, right?
 
So the facts were completely false, but the reporting was good so that's good enough for you. Now, if it had been Glenn Beck who did this, I'm sure you'd give him the same pass, fair guy that you are, right?
When i said she did good reporting, I meant she didn't spin any of the supposed 'facts'. Whereas Glenn Beck's web site spun the story about her. But you have to expect this from the Beckster.

EDIT:

Rachel just talked about last night, she said of Beck "How do we know that isn't satire as well"
 
Last edited:
I don't give her any credit. I think she ought to resign.

If I were sourcing material for this forum!! I'd look beyond a "news source" called Christwire.

What a complete bumbling idiot.

I think Glenn Beck ought to resign because he smeared a Holocaust survivor.
 
I don't give her any credit. I think she ought to resign.

If I were sourcing material for this forum!! I'd look beyond a "news source" called Christwire.

What a complete bumbling idiot.

Wait, but weren't you just defending Glenn Beck? Cmon!

I do not defend Maddow or any of these hacks that call themselves news broadcasters. How can you sit here and critique her when you just defended Glenn freaking Beck.
 
Last edited:
When i said she did good reporting, I meant she didn't spin any of the supposed 'facts'. Whereas Glenn Beck's web site spun the story about her. But you have to expect this from the Beckster.

EDIT:

Rachel just talked about last night, she said of Beck "How do we know that isn't satire as well"

Man, I've only been on this site a couple of weeks, and I swear, you have to have the biggest man crush on Glenn Beck....... I can't remember a thread where you haven't found a way to work the Beckster (nice pet name for him you thought up btw) into the thread … I sure hope this fixation with him gets better, I don't think it's too healthy for you .. after all he is a married man.
 
Man, I've only been on this site a couple of weeks, and I swear, you have to have the biggest man crush on Glenn Beck....... I can't remember a thread where you haven't found a way to work the Beckster (nice pet name for him you thought up btw) into the thread … I sure hope this fixation with him gets better, I don't think it's too healthy for you .. after all he is a married man.
Not to worry, I'm a married man as well - 39 years in April. ;)
 
while conservatives father theirs and call them heirs.

So liberals proudly abort theirs and just say **** em! right?

Feelin a liitle salty about gettin kicked around lately, huh? :lamo
 
Do you all ever get tired of being so flippin' partisan?

I never tire of shedding light into the darkness. I view it as one of my duties to help society. Its a noble calling.
 
So liberals proudly abort theirs and just say **** em! right?

Feelin a liitle salty about gettin kicked around lately, huh? :lamo

kicked around???? I have no idea what you mean.
 
When i said she did good reporting,
It was implied.
I meant she didn't spin any of the supposed 'facts'.
As opposed to the other 99.999% of the time?

Whereas Glenn Beck's web site spun the story about her. But you have to expect this from the Beckster.
They're both cut from the same cloth, the sooner you realize that the better.

EDIT:

Rachel just talked about last night, she said of Beck "How do we know that isn't satire as well"
Yes, every mistake is satire... so much for her crack investigation team eh Petey?
 
It was implied.
As opposed to the other 99.999% of the time?
That's just unprovable rhetoric which is a habit many people on the right, including Beck, Hannity, Limbaugh and their many supporters.

They're both cut from the same cloth, the sooner you realize that the better.
Not by long shot, more rhetoric. Glenn Beck would have spun a similar story and put it on his white board and somehow would draw the conclusion President Obama is a Commie socialist Nazi.
Yes, every mistake is satire... so much for her crack investigation team eh Petey?
What you don't realize is the story is actually believable coming from some Sarah Palin supporters.
 
That's just unprovable rhetoric which is a habit many people on the right, including Beck, Hannity, Limbaugh and their many supporters.
You still don't see your own hypocrisy do you. You REALLY don't see it? :lamo


Not by long shot, more rhetoric. Glenn Beck would have spun a similar story and put it on his white board and somehow would draw the conclusion President Obama is a Commie socialist Nazi.
Would have? So now your crystal ball shows hypothetical events as reality.... you said something about unprovable rhetoric? This is just too precious!!!

What you don't realize is the story is actually believable coming from some Sarah Palin supporters.
IT's believable to sheeple who hang on the word of ANY opinion barker. Somehow I doubt that will ever sink in with you.
 
It's interesting to note in passing how the taking point continues to be spun in a certain way. Maddow was caught out. She "fell for" a story, and that is how the meme is transmitted. The thread topic is almost identically worded on various political debate sites. None of them mention the fact that she realised her error and is on record admitting the fact.
 
It's interesting to note in passing how the taking point continues to be spun in a certain way. Maddow was caught out. She "fell for" a story, and that is how the meme is transmitted. The thread topic is almost identically worded on various political debate sites. None of them mention the fact that she realised her error and is on record admitting the fact.

pretty sure if you bother to read the whole thread, you'll see her Twitter retraction was mentioned... as was her lack of a retraction on her actual show.
 
only to you because of your own self imposed ideological blindness.

Are you saying I could never ever support anything Democratic, or anything from President Obama, because of my ideological blindness? I just want to clarify. Is that what you're saying?
 
Are you saying I could never ever support anything Democratic, or anything from President Obama, because of my ideological blindness? I just want to clarify. Is that what you're saying?

Not at all. I am simply being a smartass to you in reply to you being a smartass to me.
 
Back
Top Bottom