• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Obama thinks Illinois court acted stupidly, or something

He had a right to his opinion, when he said that the Cambridge police department acted, "stupidly".

The whole point of the blog is, of course Obama's going to disagree with the court ruling. Rhambeaux is his boy. Obama is going to disgree with the court decision, no matter how obviously correct the decision may be.
Kind of like how you hate everything that goes on that includes Obama even if it necessitates you making up crap that was said?
 
He had a right to his opinion, when he said that the Cambridge police department acted, "stupidly".

The whole point of the blog is, of course Obama's going to disagree with the court ruling. Rhambeaux is his boy. Obama is going to disgree with the court decision, no matter how obviously correct the decision may be.

Yes, he did. However, in that case, he phrased it poorly, and was too quick to cast blame.

I do not see evidence of that in the OP in this situation.
 
who the hell said i was trying to be sarcastic? I was stating a simple truth. The title of the article (and this thread) is full of BS.

See what I mean? :lamo
 
The title of the blog is sarcasm, just like most of the content. Obviously, you missed it.

Sarcasm? Or BS exaggeration and a failed attempt at trying to be funny? Sarcasm is saying one thing while meaning another. That's not what happened here. It was nothing but HOT AIR.
 
Sarcasm? Or BS exaggeration and a failed attempt at trying to be funny? Sarcasm is saying one thing while meaning another. That's not what happened here. It was nothing but HOT AIR.

No, it's sarcasm.
 
Just responding to the, "yooze-a-hata", card.

You do hate Obama, though. That fact permeates your posts. Why else would someone from Louisianna be concerned with the Chicago Mayoral race? Simply because of their utter contempt for Obama.

If you think that pointing out that equates to accusations of racism, it's because of the victim-mentality that also permeates your every post.
 
Why not just say that it’s a matter for the state of Illinois to determine? Why is that so difficult for this particular White House to manage? Contrary to their apparent belief, the President doesn’t get a say in state politics.

What, the President isn't entitled to an opinion? He's not trying to affect policy. He voiced an opinion. He thinks the courts got it wrong. Emanuel is his boy. I don't see what the big deal is. Apparently the problem stems from the fact that the residency requirement for being a voter is different from that of being a mayoral candidate.
 
You do hate Obama, though. That fact permeates your posts. Why else would someone from Louisianna be concerned with the Chicago Mayoral race? Simply because of their utter contempt for Obama.



No I don't. I'm sure he's a great guy. Just a ****ty prez.

If you think that pointing out that equates to accusations of racism, it's because of the victim-mentality that also permeates your every post.

You just got me all figgered, out huh? I'm sure you're being objective, especially after you called me a lair and a plaigerist in another thread.
 
No I don't. I'm sure he's a great guy. Just a ****ty prez.

You hate him enough to attack him for utter nonsense repeatedly. That's fine. There's nothing wrong with hating him. Why pretend that you don't?

You just got me all figgered, out huh?

Not all figured out.

I'm sure you're being objective, especially after you called me a lair and a plaigerist in another thread.

Objectively speaking, you were lying and plagarizing in that thread.
 
You hate him enough to attack him for utter nonsense repeatedly. That's fine. There's nothing wrong with hating him. Why pretend that you don't?

And, I hate him because...you say so? Who the **** are you? Anyway?



Not all figured out.

Then, stop acting like you can read my mind.



Objectively speaking, you were lying and plagarizing in that thread.

Actually, I wasn't, but since you don't understand the difference between, "current", and, "former", I don't expect you to realize that.
 
And, I hate him because...you say so?

No. I'm saying you hate him because it's obvious given teh nature of your posts and atacks on him.

Who the **** are you?

Tucker Case. nice to meet you.


Anyway what?




Then, stop acting like you can read my mind.

One doesn't need to read your mind to read your posts. what I haven't figured out yet would be the stuff you haven't posted about. Hence the italicized "all".





Actually, I wasn't, but since you don't understand the difference between, "current", and, "former", I don't expect you to realize that.

Actually, you were, but since you don't know what plagairism means, you mistakenly believe you didn't do it. And the fact of the matter is that I listed multiple peopel who did, in fact, own slaves at teh time of th econvention. Your denials don't change reality.
 
Actually, you were, but since you don't know what plagairism means, you mistakenly believe you didn't do it. And the fact of the matter is that I listed multiple peopel who did, in fact, own slaves at teh time of th econvention. Your denials don't change reality.

And, you were wrong. Plus, I didn't plaigerize anything. A list of names isn't plaigerism.
 
And, you were wrong.

No, I wasn't. Pretending that I was won't alter reality.

Plus, I didn't plaigerize anything. A list of names isn't plaigerism.

When another person did the research necessary to compile that list it's plagiarism because you are passing off their work as your own. It's also a lie which you perpetrated when you said "OK I forgot one". That's nonsense. The source you stole the information from didn't include them becuase they didn't fit the description the source was using for that particular list (your misrrepresentation of the information was also a lie).

Crying and moaning about victimhood agfter stealing other people's work and getting called on it is pure victim-mentality bull****. Read your damned signature and take it to heart.
 
No, I wasn't. Pretending that I was won't alter reality.
Calling me names isn't going to make you any less wrong about the issue.



When another person did the research necessary to compile that list it's plagiarism because you are passing off their work as your own. It's also a lie which you perpetrated when you said "OK I forgot one". That's nonsense. The source you stole the information from didn't include them becuase they didn't fit the description the source was using for that particular list (your misrrepresentation of the information was also a lie).

Crying and moaning about victimhood agfter stealing other people's work and getting called on it is pure victim-mentality bull****. Read your damned signature and take it to heart.

No it's not! Grow up!
 
Calling me names isn't going to make you any less wrong about the issue.

Pretending to be a victim for being called by the name your actons dictate that you be called by isn't going to make the names any less accurate a description.





No it's not! Grow up!

:rofl

The irony of this statemnt is simply awesome. :lol:
 
Back
Top Bottom