Badmutha
Banned
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2011
- Messages
- 1,951
- Reaction score
- 395
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
This post caught my eye. Here are my extensive comments:
No doubt someone is to be employed to fly the helicopter, so that's at least one job.
Which no doubt employed a few people to build...
Which again, clearly employed a few people.
Ditto.
Does it not occur to people that perhaps there are plans to increase traffic there? Again, surely we didn't just throw the money on the ground and a runway popped right up...
This probably involved interviews and distributing surveys...which means most of the money probably went to employ people.
Long term employment for at least a few people.
Did the tunnel just build itself? Surely not...
If this is the project I'm thinking of, I know the contractor who got this job. He was able to keep 15 people employed who he otherwise would have had to let go because of this contract. And though the lake bed is dry, there's a steep drop-off near the road. That's what the guardrail was built for.
It didn't renovate itself. And now it's in use. Given the cost of shipping long distances via semi trailer, we need to be rehabilitating our rail system.
Out of 862 billion dollars, that's a pretty small level of error...
Which must surely employ at least a few people...
Did they weatherize themselves, or did a few people get paid to do it?
Is this reporter unaware of the facts of life? If you want fish, you'll need fish sperm. And again, I imagine that it needs employed people to run it.
Employed at least one vet and a few assistants.
Given that the alternative would be having this dumbass reporter claiming that the stimulus money wasn't being used for anything, this seems like a fair thing. And again, surely people were paid to make, ship, and place those signs...
Now this one, I disagree with. A lot more people need to kill themselves. I have a long list of suggestions about who if you're interested...
I happen to know that this study was conducted by robots who are made and serviced by other robots...
Robots, again...
Does the reporter think this was accomplished by robots also (gay decorator robots, perhaps)?
Potentially saving significant health care costs that would otherwise come out of the taxpayer pocket...and again, surely it took paying some people to accomplish the study.
Again, people paid to do this. And, it should moderately increase traffic to the National Forest over the long term, which means a need for more park rangers and maintenance workers. When you build infrastructure, jobs are also created.
But strangely, it will be a museum that employs absolutely no one at all...
Would you want to live in a world where there were no stories or music? Seriously? And people have to be paid to make them. Even baskets have a use, and people pay for them, and have to be paid to make them.
The more "viral" ways we can find to get people thinking about energy efficiency, the better.
Staffed by robots and built by same...hopefully by now the point is obvious.
So what your saying is........there is no such thing as a bridge to nowhere.......and every and any government project is full of merit.....and worthy of stealing from our Grandchildren's grandchildren. The government is the almighty and can do no wrong.
Now, since these are government funded, they automatically come under fire from conservatives. However, when private enterprise produces plastic pumpkins for getting halloween candy (because sacks weren't working well enough), imitation bull scrota for hanging off the back of your pickup truck, tuxedos in 17 different colors and styles for Ken and Barbie dolls, aerosol cheese spray in a holiday can, or, say, mortgage backed securities, those same conservatives make the points I just made: it employs people.
Well except the biggest difference is the Plastic Pumpkin factory, Bull Scrota Inc., and Matell.........
.........dont send men with guns to your door if you refuse to buy their product......like Governemnt does.
If your having a hard time making ends meet, putting food on the table, or just not inclined to buy cheese spray or bull scrota.........
........the Plastic Pumpkin factory, Bull Scrota Inc., and Matell dont automatically seize 30-50% of your paycheck.....like Government does.
Your justification for your entire argument ends with "Well it employs people"........which leads me to believe you dont know the difference between a JOB and a JOB. One is long term employment........the other occurs after a rubdown in an asian massage parlor or after a Democrat "stimulus bill". One benefits society and the economy.....the other leaves the public wanting their money back from those spend happy liberal whores.
What happens to those "millions of jobs created by PORKULUS" the very second stimulus funding runs out?
So did this Subprime Government Spending to Nowhere actually create "Jobs"......or just postpone unemployment?
.
.
.
.
.