• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Sarah Palin coins ‘word of the year,’ books boffo cable debut

Conservative said:
Now that Obama is President and the least qualified individual to be elected to the office, Palin doesn't worry me in the least.
Click to expand...
So why the hell are you defending her? :doh

Can you ever be consistent?
 
Conservative said:
Now that Obama is President and the least qualified individual to be elected to the office, Palin doesn't worry me in the least. At least she has executive experience and ran something. Obama was a community organizer who is now in over his head. He has that delegation definition down pat but his problem is he delegates responsibility and you cannot do that when in a leadership position. Truman said it best, "the buck stops here." That is Obama's problem along with most of his supporters. They don't understand management and being an executive. Obama's election has dumbed down the office in terms of management skills so I am less concerned about Palin that the left who understands that they put a lemon on the ballot and the American people bought the rhetoric and ignored the resume.
Click to expand...


I did not realize this was a resume comparing thread:confused:
 
Conservative said:
Interesting how a Canadian is so concerned about a non elected official yet ignores the elected one that is destroying the economy. Unfortunately Obama is the "gift" that keeps on giving misery.
Click to expand...

Oh have a sense of humour rocky dennis.
 
Conservative said:
Doubt that anyone that voted for Obama has a lot of room to talk about Palin's qualifications to be President. Obama supporters seem to buy his rhetoric which they valued higher than his resume and now even more than his results. I would take Palin in a heartbeat over the empty suit we have in the WH.
Click to expand...

Before she was picked to be McCain's running mate she was on CNBC with Larry Kudlow. She said the job of president of the Senate was to join the debate. She's a dumb-ass.
 
People should be careful not to misunderestimate Ms. Palin here.
 
pbrauer said:
Before she was picked to be McCain's running mate she was on CNBC with Larry Kudlow. She said the job of president of the Senate was to join the debate. She's a dumb-ass.
Click to expand...

No more so than the guy you helped elect in the WH, our Community organizer that hasn't a clue how to manage anything. I wouldn't be talking about qualifications to be President with the one you helped elect in the office. He is in way over his head and the results show it. This Administration doesn't have a clue the private sector works and the results show that.
 
Conservative said:
Now that Obama is President and the least qualified individual to be elected to the office, Palin doesn't worry me in the least. At least she has executive experience and ran something. Obama was a community organizer who is now in over his head. He has that delegation definition down pat but his problem is he delegates responsibility and you cannot do that when in a leadership position. Truman said it best, "the buck stops here." That is Obama's problem along with most of his supporters. They don't understand management and being an executive. Obama's election has dumbed down the office in terms of management skills so I am less concerned about Palin that the left who understands that they put a lemon on the ballot and the American people bought the rhetoric and ignored the resume.
Click to expand...

I don't see how being a community organizer disqualifies somebody from presidency... He served his community and tried to help people for little personal gain. I think it is an admirable job to do, regardless of a person's politics. Helping the community should be a value of all politicians and it's community members. I never understood why people think it's a good idea to bash him on this.
 
Conservative said:
Now that Obama is President and the least qualified individual to be elected to the office, Palin doesn't worry me in the least. At least she has executive experience and ran something. Obama was a community organizer who is now in over his head. He has that delegation definition down pat but his problem is he delegates responsibility and you cannot do that when in a leadership position. Truman said it best, "the buck stops here." That is Obama's problem along with most of his supporters. They don't understand management and being an executive. Obama's election has dumbed down the office in terms of management skills so I am less concerned about Palin that the left who understands that they put a lemon on the ballot and the American people bought the rhetoric and ignored the resume.
Click to expand...

Hey I wanted Hillary but she didn't win the nomination.
 
SheWolf said:
I don't see how being a community organizer disqualifies somebody from presidency... He served his community and tried to help people for little personal gain. I think it is an admirable job to do, regardless of a person's politics. Helping the community should be a value of all politicians and it's community members. I never understood why people think it's a good idea to bash him on this.
Click to expand...

Obama doesn't have a clue how to make a payroll or how to manage anything, his was nothing more than a community agitator. Helping the community isn't what Obama did, instead he tried to redistribute wealth and that isn't how our economy was built.

I have no problem with a community organizer but just not one as President.
 
Saboteur said:
Hey I wanted Hillary but she didn't win the nomination.
Click to expand...

Hillary would be better than Obama but still not the answer. There is a reason that we seldom elect Senators to the Presidency and that has to do with the lack of private sector experience as they live in a dream world that is recession proof.
 
Conservative said:
Hillary would be better than Obama but still not the answer. There is a reason that we seldom elect Senators to the Presidency and that has to do with the lack of private sector experience as they live in a dream world that is recession proof.
Click to expand...

These past 2 elections was all about the recession... hardly call that recession proof.
 
Conservative said:
Hillary would be better than Obama but still not the answer. There is a reason that we seldom elect Senators to the Presidency and that has to do with the lack of private sector experience as they live in a dream world that is recession proof.
Click to expand...


Yeah lets pick a guy whose oil companies went bankrupt not once not twice but three times!!!
 
Jetboogieman said:
These past 2 elections was all about the recession... hardly call that recession proof.
Click to expand...

Being in Congress is a recession proof position and that is the point. Hillary never ran a business, never made a payroll, never invested her own money thus taking risk and never suffered during any recession that Congressional policies created.
 
Conservative said:
Being in Congress is a recession proof position and that is the point. Hillary never ran a business, never made a payroll, never invested her own money thus taking risk and never suffered during any recession that Congressional policies created.
Click to expand...

hillary was a partner in a law firm, that counts as running a business. and if you remember, she did invest her own money. lol.
 
winston53660 said:
Yeah lets pick a guy whose oil companies went bankrupt not once not twice but three times!!!
Click to expand...

It really bothers you that GW Bush was elected twice, doesn't it? Running a business and even failing gives one more experience than Obama ever had. People learn from their experiences, too bad some people don't have the ability to do actual research. GW Bush will be judged much better than you and others who use your partisan blinders that ignore actual results. A lot of bankrupt individuals made it big learning from their failures. obama not once has been held to the same standards that you always held Bush to and that is your problem.
 
Conservative said:
Doubt that anyone that voted for Obama has a lot of room to talk about Palin's qualifications to be President. Obama supporters seem to buy his rhetoric which they valued higher than his resume and now even more than his results. I would take Palin in a heartbeat over the empty suit we have in the WH.
Click to expand...

Me too, I think ANY thinking American would, but that said, she wouldn't be my first choice for President, that's for sure.


Tim-
 
liblady said:
hillary was a partner in a law firm, that counts as running a business. and if you remember, she did invest her own money. lol.
Click to expand...

Yes, she invested her own money into cattle futures and made a fortune with insider information. I said that Hillary was better than obama, just not the answer to what we need. I will take another Governor any day over Hillary or our Community Organizer.

By the way still looking for that 600 billion you claimed would be reduced from the deficit if the tax on the rich expired?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom