• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

95% of Marines uncomfortable serving with openly gay troops

If that's not good enough for you, well, maybe you're not professional enough to serve.
Click to expand...

It's up to the Marines at the end of the day, not to a bunch of insolent Pelosi-wannabes or even ordinary blokes like me. There's another nub, again treated with derision by leftists.



When it comes to my rights, yeah, pretty much.
Click to expand...

That's the bottom line (no pun intended). Stuff whether or not firemen want to participate in pride rallies or stuff whether taxpayers' money should be spent on schoolroom indoctrination of kids who have only just mastered writing their own name. As long as the rights of your kind to force society into accepting what you deem is good are not violated then it's all hunky-dory.



You think America's bans on same-sex marriage, DADT, and previous bans on sodomy came from Islam?
Click to expand...

No, you're being disingenuous.
 
(which, by the way, is not "named" "the Religion of Peace")
Click to expand...

In another brainwashing exercise, Liberals started calling it the Religion of Peace after September 11. But even they sometimes know when to stop flogging a dead horse and thus the term is now used sarcastically.



http://www.intelligencesquared.com/events/islam-is-a-religion-of-peace



School textbooks malign the Religion of Peace, grizzles US Muslim group

The ‘Religion of Peace’ strikes again

Islam Religion Of Peace Explained By Plo Brigade Member :)
 
Good news for the people that want to keep DADT.....I heard on one of the talking heads shows today that the people that want DADT repealed do not have the votes and will not be able to get repeal during the lame duck congress.........That is great news for our military...........
 
Navy Pride said:
Good news for the people that want to keep DADT.....I heard on one of the talking heads shows today that the people that want DADT repealed do not have the votes and will not be able to get repeal during the lame duck congress.........That is great news for our military...........
Click to expand...

Not really....it means good people would not be able to serve. Great news for the bigots and homophobes of the world though.
 
Navy Pride said:
THey are already serving...They just can't flaunt their sexuality which is a good thing...........
Click to expand...

You mean they have to lie.

I live in a world where honesty is a preferred virtue over deceit. I guess you live in a different world......
 
disneydude said:
You mean they have to lie.

I live in a world where honesty is a preferred virtue over deceit. I guess you live in a different world......
Click to expand...

No they don't have to lie, they just don't need to flaunt or tell people..........
 
Navy Pride said:
No they don't have to lie, they just don't need to flaunt or tell people..........
Click to expand...

Sure....they have to lie....and straight seamen can go diddle other guys wives while they are away serving the country and suffer no repercussion.....

What screwed up values our military has.
 
Looks like Alaska isn't as backward as some of their leaders portray.
Click to expand...

The mighty Liberals speak, wanton in their wisdom. Tough luck all you people thinking the wrong things.

WHat makes them think it's their business to dictate what soldiers should feel and accept anyway? It's pretty much a different world in the military. The thing to do, to be truly Liberal, is to allow the fighting men involved a vote rather than a bunch of self-interested Marxist-lite punks.
 
ptif219 said:
Not speaking is not lying
Click to expand...

Give me a break. A Gay person in that situation would have to lie every day in order to not violate DADT. Even saying "I'm not permitted to comment on that" would be a vioation of DADt.
 
Republic_Of_Public said:
Yeah. Much better to follow the lead of flag-burners and Commie-lovers on the riot lines every time.
Click to expand...

That's a stretch. So.....people who believe that telling the truth rather than lying are "Flag-burners and Commie-lovers"......that's just ridiculous.
 
Republic_Of_Public said:
The mighty Liberals speak, wanton in their wisdom. Tough luck all you people thinking the wrong things.

WHat makes them think it's their business to dictate what soldiers should feel and accept anyway? It's pretty much a different world in the military. The thing to do, to be truly Liberal, is to allow the fighting men involved a vote rather than a bunch of self-interested Marxist-lite punks.
Click to expand...

You wouldn't like the outcome of that vote.......sorry.
 
disneydude said:
Give me a break. A Gay person in that situation would have to lie every day in order to not violate DADT. Even saying "I'm not permitted to comment on that" would be a vioation of DADt.
Click to expand...

No it wouldn't!!!!! Where the hell do you even get that from?!?

No wonder you oppose DADT, you don't a ****ing clue what it's about.
 
disneydude said:
Give me a break. A Gay person in that situation would have to lie every day in order to not violate DADT. Even saying "I'm not permitted to comment on that" would be a vioation of DADt.
Click to expand...

Why? They should not be asked. A persons sexuality should not be brought up. The problem is gays think we care if they are gay.Don't tell, another words shut up and no one will care. That is not lying that is not talking
 
Absolutely. Bang on the button.

One activist for gay rights, I can't remember when or where, said he was dismayed at the Peter Tachell types. He reckoned that there were other ways to go about it than have shoulder-bechipped gays 'thrust their d*cks in peoples' faces'.
 
You wouldn't like the outcome of that vote.......sorry.
Click to expand...

What makes you so cocksure, to coin an unfortunate phrase? Or perhaps you have an idea based on the fact that the wrong people would be polled.
 
As usual when it comes to the military DD is clueless..........No one is asking anyone if they are gay.....That is what DON'T ASK means.........
 
apdst said:
No it wouldn't!!!!! Where the hell do you even get that from?!?

No wonder you oppose DADT, you don't a ****ing clue what it's about.
Click to expand...

Absolutely it would. It already has....you really need to read up a little
 
Republic_Of_Public said:
What makes you so cocksure, to coin an unfortunate phrase? Or perhaps you have an idea based on the fact that the wrong people would be polled.
Click to expand...

The results of the pentagon study are already known. The men/women of the military by an overwhelming percentage say that they have no problem with gays serving openly in the military.

Face it.....people with the mentality that you embrace are slowly dying out. Its a new world.
 
Navy Pride said:
As usual when it comes to the military DD is clueless..........No one is asking anyone if they are gay.....That is what DON'T ASK means.........
Click to expand...

So....Navy...let me ask you this then. Its ok for people like you to run around in the military "bragging" about boinking another man's wife while her husband is away on leave serving the country.....but a gay person can't even say "I'm gay" without violating DADT.

How does this hypocrisy further the value of our military?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom