Ahh... Indeed. And What Progressive does?
Ya see how that works friends? And this has been a longstanding trend... Progressives don't NEED AN ARGUMENT. They don't NEED SOUND REASONING resting on a valid logical construct. No no... All the Progressive needs is the self assurance that validity and truth rest somewhere in the middle-way... They're in the middle, so... it's axiomatic.
And therein lies the amazing convenience of hysterical populism. No thinkin' necessary... just latch onto the compromise between right and wrong and PRESTO!
Have you educated yourself on Libertarians yet? If you have, I insist you give your reasoning to me as how they are 'progressives' 'liberals' 'socialists' 'leftists', whatever Beck might be calling them these days.
Also maybe you can give your reasoning on how moderates, centrists, etc. are also 'progressives' 'liberals' 'socialists' 'leftists'.
If you give me good reasoning perhaps i can debate further the difference.
Indeed... that would be the comfort of one's delusion, intrinsic in owning the inferior position. Such usually begins by projecting that the superior position is simply not reasonable. Which of course is IRRESISTABLE where the rules axiomatically reject any need for logically valid, intellectually sound reasoning.
I'm delusional because i believe you aren't reasonable? I've yet to see any reasonable points from you linking 'progressives' 'liberals' 'socialists' 'leftists' 'moderates' 'centrists' 'libertarians', other then the typing of said words progressive and populist etc. in caps lock.
ROFL... My claims are irrational? Which claims are those Sis? The claim which challenges your self-assigned title as "Libertarian"? Huh... I thought it fairly spot on, given you're a self-professed "Moderate" in your account shingle.... Moderates are the embodiment of the Progressive, Scout. That you feel you need to lean on the right side of that yellow line is a good sign; you at least seem to have some discernible sign of conscience. But at the end of the day, knowing you're wrong only adds to the severity of one's punishment, where one continues to walk down the leftist path and it manifest itself into Anti-American action.
What you think is spot on may be rational to you, but refusing to give reasoning behind it doesn't make it rational to others. Again give me reason behind your claim. Infact, you would be better off actually making some sort of logical, coherent point.
The topic is Glenn Beck and his re-educating of the American Public; a tactic which he's chosen as a means to replace the misinformation, disinformation and raw revisionism employed by the Ideological Left as a means to subvert America; as a means to dislodge from America the immutable Principles intrinsic in the cornerstone of her foundation... I'm simply pointing out that those who disagree with Beck, do so because they (you) are part and parcel of that foreign ideology... I've merely asked you to produce a valid stated basis for your disagreement with Beck; to which you've responded by denying you're a Progressive and demanding that you've no 'NEED TO HAVE A SOUND ARGUMENT'... which I pointed out was incontrovertible evidence of a progressive, demonstrating that such is precisely what ya are.
I'd say we're centered on the issue. So don't sweat it.
The topic is about his university. The topic isn't about whether Beck is right or wrong. Being liberal is not an Anti-American foreign ideology. We have a 2 party system for a reason.
I'm not automatically progressive because i choose not to have an argument with an incoherent, irrational dope, who has yet to give his reasoning behind why be believes all 'progressives' 'liberals' 'socialists' 'leftists' 'moderates' 'centrists' 'libertarians' are all alike and Anti-American.
Once you have made a point i consider reasonable we will discuss this further.
Have you educated yourself as why a libertarian is not a liberal yet?