• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Army 'showdown' at eligibility corral. Lt. Col. asks for birth cert.

Same as always....... as soon as anyone should be so crass as to actually question Barry's credentials, someone rushes in to get the thread tossed in the basement......... usually at around 100+ posts.

Good job Redress......... Barry is proud of you.

This is why no one takes birthers seriously. Honesty is not part of their debate process. The conspiracy theory forum is not the basement, not even close. No one is trying to hide the thread, only mock birthers.

So, win any court cases yet?
 
Do I come off as someone to be comanded around? Why can't you read it your damned self?

Capture-12.jpg


The real question is, can you correctly interpret what you are reading?

I'll know more about that tomorrow. :2wave:

I already read it. And asked you what your point was. Three times now, I believe.
 
Speaking about the "birther" issue. Lets say that Obama was not born in a hospital or had proper documentation irregardless of whether he was born in the US or not. It would be more convenient for his parents to have a paper showing his birth in the U.S especially since they were going to spend a few years over seas. Just this it was convenient at that time nothing more than that. The question becomes why cannot an independent, non-political, investigator look at the documentation? Somthing smells there i it may not be proof of forien berth but it may be something.
 
Speaking about the "birther" issue. Lets say that Obama was not born in a hospital or had proper documentation irregardless of whether he was born in the US or not. It would be more convenient for his parents to have a paper showing his birth in the U.S especially since they were going to spend a few years over seas. Just this it was convenient at that time nothing more than that. The question becomes why cannot an independent, non-political, investigator look at the documentation? Somthing smells there i it may not be proof of forien berth but it may be something.

Oh good lord...

You mean like the director of Hawaii’s Department of Health?

How about the registrar of vital statistics?
 
Speaking about the "birther" issue. Lets say that Obama was not born in a hospital or had proper documentation irregardless of whether he was born in the US or not. It would be more convenient for his parents to have a paper showing his birth in the U.S especially since they were going to spend a few years over seas. Just this it was convenient at that time nothing more than that. The question becomes why cannot an independent, non-political, investigator look at the documentation? Somthing smells there i it may not be proof of forien berth but it may be something.

He has a legal, proper birth certificate from Hawaii.

End of discussion.

Of course, we all know exactly what would happen if some "independent, non-political investigator" looked into it. He/she would conclude that the documents were legal and proper, or that there isn't enough information to add anything to the debate. If the former happened, the investigator's independence would immediately be questioned, or the evidence he examined would simply be called fake too. If the second happened, the loons would crow that this was proof of something.

These guys will believe absolutely anything, not matter how absurd, as long as it keeps their preposterous ideas alive. It's what nutbag conspiracy theorists do.
 
Last edited:
its-a-conspiracy.jpg
Gasp......... why, that is a violation of Hawaii’s State law!!!!!! (HRS 338) Do you realize she gave out confidential information that is illegal for her to divulge? Do you often quote criminals to back up your views?

I suppose it could be, but the more reasonable explanation might be that she is a Barry supporter, and doesn't know the laws she opperates under..... that might also be the reason the AG doesn't want anything to do with her.

Of course I'd never expect a gullible faither to see that.

You just keep recycling the same tired arguments that have been refuted. She did not violate hawaii state law she revealed no confidential information that wasnt already public knowledge. She verified that they have his records on file and that they check out. There is no violation herel

As for alterations, the alteration was done to the scan not the document itself. That document is a short form printout which is the format most states have switched to. Try getting your birth certificate now and youll get something similar.

By the way Im still waiting for you to file that legal challenge in court you claimed you were going to.
 
I can. Can you?
He doesnt understand because the BC doesnt matter to him hes made just as bad arguments unrelated to the bc. Prima facie is the keywords. This document is enough to get a passport, license, ID, and is documentation that he was born a US citizen. A citizen at birth is natural born.
 
They did. The document was verified.

By the daily KOS? Factcheck.org? You aren't being serious are you?

Please link what proper authority verified the document posted on the internet was a real document that truly reflected Barry's situation at birth........ go ahead, the world wants to know. :rofl

BTW...... that little disclaimer on the botton of the COLB? It says right there in black and white, that document is only good in court to prove birth..... that's it, and the reason it says "prima facie evidence" is so that the court can call for the real documents that would back up the information alleged on the COLB.

For some real interesting reading, try HRS 338-18 (B), and 338-19...... you will find that the COLB is for, among other things, out of State births.

You gullible Faithers really crack me up.
 
By the daily KOS? Factcheck.org? You aren't being serious are you?

Please link what proper authority verified the document posted on the internet was a real document that truly reflected Barry's situation at birth........ go ahead, the world wants to know. :rofl

BTW...... that little disclaimer on the botton of the COLB? It says right there in black and white, that document is only good in court to prove birth..... that's it, and the reason it says "prima facie evidence" is so that the court can call for the real documents that would back up the information alleged on the COLB.

For some real interesting reading, try HRS 338-18 (B), and 338-19...... you will find that the COLB is for, among other things, out of State births.

You gullible Faithers really crack me up.


Ahh crazy crunch back your old games. Prima facie translated means self evident. Prima facie evidence is something that is self evident in the facts. This document holds up as proof of birth in the state of hawaii within the united states. It is on you to present prima facie evidence that states otherwise. This document isnt only good in court its good for getting a passport, ID, licenses, etc. Again Crunch the facts are not on your side.

According to the rules an out of state birth would not have the city of birth as Honolulu, Hawaii on it.
 
Last edited:
By the daily KOS? Factcheck.org? You aren't being serious are you?

By the director of records for the state of Hawaii.

BTW...... that little disclaimer on the botton of the COLB? It says right there in black and white, that document is only good in court to prove birth..... that's it, and the reason it says "prima facie evidence" is so that the court can call for the real documents that would back up the information alleged on the COLB.

LOL!

Really? You think that's what "prima facie evidence" means? Hint - no, it doesn't. It means the opposite.
 
You cant read can you? The letter from Bennett's subordinate defers to the department of health which keeps vital records. The document states that the attorney general does not keep those records and therefore cannot comment on nor release them. Nice misread birther.

No surprise there.

The dog-catcher also refused to comment on the birth certificate. What is he hiding?
 
You cant read can you? The letter from Bennett's subordinate defers to the department of health which keeps vital records. The document states that the attorney general does not keep those records and therefore cannot comment on nor release them. Nice misread birther.

Nice skipping of the facts in the article gullible Faither....

…Ms. Okubo,

I am currently a masters degree candidate at …

The reason that I am contacting your organizations is that you are, as far as I can tell from my research, the only two groups that have openly stated that President Obama is a natural born citizen (one of the Article II, Section I qualifications for being President). I would like to document how you came to that conclusion: i.e. what the criteria is for your organization, what evidence the candidate provides, etc. I thank you for your time, and look forward to receiving a response in the near future.

Sincerely,

Justin W. Riggs

Janice Okubo responded later that day:

From: Okubo, Janice S.. <janice.okubo@doh.hawaii.gov>
Date: Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 12:20 PM
To: Justin Riggs [email address redacted]…

Aloha Justin,

The statement was reviewed and approved by our Attorney General Mark Bennett. I am unable to provide further comment.

Janice Okubo
Communications Office
Hawaii State Department of Health…

I don't know why I bother with a guy that I've caught in numerous lies...... don't expect me to continue. Just like you should not believe a proven liar like Janice Okubo or Dr. Chiyome Fukino.
 
He said he has no information about it.

Only a conspiracy theorist would turn "nothing" into something.

But Janice Okubo says he approved the statement... so which is it? Who is lying?
 
Nice skipping of the facts in the article gullible Faither....



I don't know why I bother with a guy that I've caught in numerous lies...... don't expect me to continue. Just like you should not believe a proven liar like Janice Okubo or Dr. Chiyome Fukino.
I didnt have to read the article to tell you that you cant read. The article is based on the letter from Bennet's office which stated what I said. Okubo nor Fukino have not been proven as liars. You, however, have been as shown by your misstating what Bennett's office said.
 
I didnt have to read the article to tell you that you cant read. The article is based on the letter from Bennet's office which stated what I said. Okubo nor Fukino have not been proven as liars. You, however, have been as shown by your misstating what Bennett's office said.

You didn't read the article, yet you know what is in it.

Gullible Faither.

Go show!!!!!!
 
But Janice Okubo says he approved the statement... so which is it? Who is lying?
You act as if they're mutually exclusive. Mark Bennetts office did not say Okubo is lying. She said that the statement was approved. This simply means that language of her statement was legal and correct. You birthers sure love making magical connections.
 
By the daily KOS? Factcheck.org? You aren't being serious are you?
Who?

Please link what proper authority verified the document posted on the internet was a real document that truly reflected Barry's situation at birth........ go ahead, the world wants to know. :rofl
Director of Hawaii’s Department of Health
 
You didn't read the article, yet you know what is in it.

Gullible Faither.

Go show!!!!!!
The article was from a birther site you already told me what it said. I read the basis for the article which was the letter from Bennetts office. The letter, which I read, tells one all they need to know. Did you read the letter?
 
The poor man is scared to deploy.
 
Back
Top Bottom