• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Army Secretary: Soldiers Can Still Be Discharged for Admit They Are Gay

Navy Pride

DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 11, 2005
Messages
39,883
Reaction score
3,070
Location
Pacific NW
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Conservative
This fight is far from over...........


FOXNews.com - Army Secretary: Soldiers Can Still Be Discharged for Admitting They Are Gay

1 April 2010

Army Secretary: Soldiers Can Still Be Discharged for Admitting They Are Gay


Reversing course, Army Secretary John McHugh warned soldiers Thursday that they still can be discharged for admitting they are gay, saying he misspoke earlier this week when he suggested the military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy had been temporarily suspended.
 
Yes, the rule has not been officially repealed. This isn't a surprise to anyone.

By the way, when was the last time you changed your signature? You're like those guys in 2008 who still had Bush/Cheney bumper stickers on their cars. :mrgreen:
 
That's not even what that article you posted is about. Did you read past the headline.

The point of the article is that the army secretary had told gays that he wanted to hear from them about ways they would suggest that could help facilitate the lifting of the ban.
He later realized that asking for input would violate the DADT policy and so he retracted his statement to ensure that people wouldn't rely on his mistake.

Talk about dishonesty in trying to spin this into something it isn't even about.
You MIGHT want to read the article before posting....in the future. :doh:doh:doh:doh:doh
 
Yes, the rule has not been officially repealed. This isn't a surprise to anyone.

By the way, when was the last time you changed your signature? You're like those guys in 2008 who still had Bush/Cheney bumper stickers on their cars. :mrgreen:

I know your young and all but its called a law not a rule.......
 
That's not even what that article you posted is about. Did you read past the headline.

The point of the article is that the army secretary had told gays that he wanted to hear from them about ways they would suggest that could help facilitate the lifting of the ban.
He later realized that asking for input would violate the DADT policy and so he retracted his statement to ensure that people wouldn't rely on his mistake.

Talk about dishonesty in trying to spin this into something it isn't even about.
You MIGHT want to read the article before posting....in the future. :doh:doh:doh:doh:doh


Here is the headline: Its pretty clear........

Army Secretary: Soldiers Can Still Be Discharged for Admitting They Are Gay
 
Here is the headline: Its pretty clear........

Army Secretary: Soldiers Can Still Be Discharged for Admitting They Are Gay

Its obvious that that is all you read. You posted a link that is completely unrelated to what you are trying to argue.
You are notorious for doing this. You could avoid it, if you read more than the headline. Like I said...it is obvious in this case that you didn't even read the article you linked. :doh
 
Its obvious that that is all you read. You posted a link that is completely unrelated to what you are trying to argue.
You are notorious for doing this. You could avoid it, if you read more than the headline. Like I said...it is obvious in this case that you didn't even read the article you linked. :doh

He is telling gays that if they come out of the closet they will be discharged.....
 
He is telling gays that if they come out of the closet they will be discharged.....

LOL....yes....but the context of the article was that he was apologizing for his mistake by not realizing that asking gays in the military how to help eliminate DADT would violate the law.
He wasn't saying "The Fight goes on" ....come out and you will be discharged.

I can understand how someone (like yourself) that hadn't read the article, might be mislead by the headline....but it usually helps if you read the article before you link it and post a thread. It helps keep Pie off your face. :3oops:
 
From the linked(and unread by Navy) article:

Third, with regard to the three soldiers who shared their views and thoughts with me on "Don't Ask, Don't Tell", I might better have counseled them that statements about their sexual orientation could not be treated as confidential and could result in their separation under the law."

McHugh's mea culpa goes on to announce changes.

"The working group is likely to utilize a third party from outside of the department to solicit these views so soldiers can speak candidly and without fear of separation. I urge every soldier to share his or her views and suggestions on this important issue through this channel. This is the appropriate way to do so."

If this does not highlight how stupid the rule is, I don't know what is. The military cannot talk to gay soldiers about the policy, because they would then have to discharge them, so they have to get a third party group to do it.
 
If this does not highlight how stupid the rule is, I don't know what is. The military cannot talk to gay soldiers about the policy, because they would then have to discharge them, so they have to get a third party group to do it.

I"d call this military intelligence:mrgreen:
 
I know your young and all but its called a law not a rule.......

Is that the best criticism you can come up with? You're literally debating semantics.

Like other people have told you, you should actually read the article you posted. I know you're old, but I'm sure you can read.
 
LOL....yes....but the context of the article was that he was apologizing for his mistake by not realizing that asking gays in the military how to help eliminate DADT would violate the law.
He wasn't saying "The Fight goes on" ....come out and you will be discharged.

I can understand how someone (like yourself) that hadn't read the article, might be mislead by the headline....but it usually helps if you read the article before you link it and post a thread. It helps keep Pie off your face. :3oops:

Nope, the context of the article is to stay ion the closet for the time being because nothing has changed and if you come out you will be kicked out...........
 
Is that the best criticism you can come up with? You're literally debating semantics.

Like other people have told you, you should actually read the article you posted. I know you're old, but I'm sure you can read.

As long as its left wingers like you telling me I don't lose any sleep over it my left wing friend........
 
Nope, the context of the article is to stay ion the closet for the time being because nothing has changed and if you come out you will be kicked out...........

Trying to teach reading comprehension to you is impossible. Especially when it is obvious that you hadn't read the article before you linked it. :doh
 
Nope, the context of the article is to stay ion the closet for the time being because nothing has changed and if you come out you will be kicked out...........

So, Breaking News: nothing has changed yet which we all knew.
 
Trying to teach reading comprehension to you is impossible. Especially when it is obvious that you hadn't read the article before you linked it. :doh

Here is the head line again....He is telling gays not to come out now or they will be discharged......

Army Secretary: Soldiers Can Still Be Discharged for Admitting They Are Gay
 
Here is the head line again....He is telling gays not to come out now or they will be discharged......

Army Secretary: Soldiers Can Still Be Discharged for Admitting They Are Gay


See post #14.
(Like I said, its obvious from your OP that the headline is the only thing you read)
 
Back
Top Bottom