• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Nazis!’: Reporter Encounters Hostility at Coakley Call Center

U.S. Army Retired

U.S. Army Retired

New member
Joined
Jan 16, 2010
Messages
43
Reaction score
14
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Conservative
I hope this is the right place to place this thread. Let me know if it isn't. Thanks.

Anyway, his must be a sign of desperation. The Coakley staffers won’t allow “biased” reporter inside their office, claiming private property and civil rights, “which we still have despite nazis like you.” Well played, “Progressives.” From screen shots of the man wearing the pinkish-reddish jacket, you can clearly see: “UFCW, Local One, ” the OUT OF STATE union letters for United Food & Commercial Workers Union local 1, Utica New York .

33xzg3d.jpg




Breitbart.tv ‘Nazis!’: Reporter Encounters Hostility at Coakley Call Center
 
Last edited:
U.S. Army Retired said:
I hope this is the right place to place this thread. Let me know if it isn't. Thanks.

Anyway, his must be a sign of desperation. The Coakley staffers won’t allow “biased” reporter inside their office, claiming private property and civil rights, “which we still have despite nazis like you.” Well played, “Progressives.” From screen shots of the man wearing the pinkish-reddish jacket, you can clearly see: “UFCW, Local One, ” the OUT OF STATE union letters for United Food & Commercial Workers Union local 1, Utica New York .

33xzg3d.jpg




Breitbart.tv ‘Nazis!’: Reporter Encounters Hostility at Coakley Call Center
Click to expand...

I didn't know you were against private property rights. What other Constitutionally protected rights do you disagree with?

While I disagree with the name calling (especially the Nazi label) on private property a person has the right to decline admittance to anyone.
 
Winnb said:
I didn't know you were against private property rights. What other Constitutionally protected rights do you disagree with?

While I disagree with the name calling (especially the Nazi label) on private property a person has the right to decline admittance to anyone.
Click to expand...
Even when they were on the public sidewalk they still asked them to leave which was wrong.
 
U.S. Army Retired said:
Even when they were on the public sidewalk they still asked them to leave which was wrong.
Click to expand...

Fair enough. If they were in a public space they're fair game for questions. Of course they can still decline to answer them

They were wrong on the name calling though. That's not necessary.
 
U.S. Army Retired said:
I hope this is the right place to place this thread. Let me know if it isn't. Thanks.

Anyway, his must be a sign of desperation. The Coakley staffers won’t allow “biased” reporter inside their office, claiming private property and civil rights, “which we still have despite nazis like you.”
Click to expand...

Sounds reasonable. They do have private property and civil rights, you know. You got something about private property rights? You think media can't be biased too?

From screen shots of the man wearing the pinkish-reddish jacket, you can clearly see: “UFCW, Local One, ” the OUT OF STATE union letters for United Food & Commercial Workers Union local 1, Utica New York .
Click to expand...

What part of "Local" or "New York" do you not understand?
 
U.S. Army Retired said:
Even when they were on the public sidewalk they still asked them to leave which was wrong.
Click to expand...

If a hostile reporter I consider biased confronts me on a sidewalk, I would ask him to leave. I wouldn't order him to leave, but there's nothing wrong with asking someone to do something, is there?

Get over it. You're the desperate one.
 
misterman said:
If a hostile reporter I consider biased confronts me on a sidewalk, I would ask him to leave. I wouldn't order him to leave, but there's nothing wrong with asking someone to do something, is there?

Get over it. You're the desperate one.
Click to expand...

I watched it on tv. I saw no hostility on the part of the reporter. It looked like harrasment.
 
Dutch said:
I watched it on tv. I saw no hostility on the part of the reporter.
Click to expand...

It doesnt' matter if there was hostility. Nobody is obligated to talk to any reporter. Thinking that the reporter is biased is a perfectly reasonable justification for that. There's very good reason to think the news outlet is biased, very much so.

Calling them Nazis wasn't very nice though. Oh well.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom