• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Michael Savage attacks Erroll Southers & The Southern Poverty Law Center

U.S. Army Retired

New member
Joined
Jan 16, 2010
Messages
43
Reaction score
14
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Conservative
He really rips into both of them and raises questions about them. Do any of you feel that veterans should be labeled extremists?


See here:
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6TKIcB4Qt3M&feature=player_embedded"]YouTube- Michael Savage Attacks Erroll Southers and The Southern Poverty Law Center - 1.12.10[/ame]
 
So there was a black man speaking about security threats and all of a sudden someone in the KKK calling him a child and saying all sorts of nasty things.

I had to stop watching.

SOrry.:2wave:
 
He really rips into both of them and raises questions about them. Do any of you feel that veterans should be extremists?

Veterans are those with loads of experience in situations regarding war or whatnot. Most of them are retired, living soothing lives and they are absolutely not extremists. They shouldn't have any extremist ideas either because they always conquer their relentless inner personal demons.

Oh and "Barack Hussein O-Bummer"? :rofl
 
Last edited:
Savage calling someone extremist is irony.
 
Savage condemning anyone is an accolade in normal terms.
 
Savage calling someone extremist is irony.

Michael Savage undergoing waterboarding, then coming out and saying it is torture, is not extremist. He might have views you don't like, but he is a decent guy. I like his show too. If you want to point to an extremist, how about Rush Limbaugh?
 
He really rips into both of them and raises questions about them. Do any of you feel that veterans should be labeled extremists?


See here:
YouTube- Michael Savage Attacks Erroll Southers and The Southern Poverty Law Center - 1.12.10

Um. U.S. Army Retired, you are being incredibly dishonest and so is Michael Savage. Our intelligence groups have for years stated that the biggest threats to national security are domestic groups. The same exact groups this person named.

Domestic threats called a greater danger to US - The Boston Globe

When it comes to fears about a terrorist attack, people in the United States usually focus on Osama bin Laden and foreign-based radical groups. Yet researchers say domestic extremists who commit violence in the name of their cause - abortion or the environment, for example - account for most of the damage from such incidents in this country.

These home-grown groups are seven times more likely than overseas groups to commit some kind of violence in the United States, a panel reported yesterday in Boston at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science.

In many ways, actions by these domestic extremists can be termed "terrorist" cases, the researchers indicated. "The typical 'terrorist' is an alienated guy, usually a young male," said Brian Forst of American University in Washington.

"They take comfort in like-minded souls and develop an idea they think will make a splash," he said. They do not always carry it out, but sometimes they do, he said. "They are not lunatics."

"Environmentalists don't need much. They need a spray can. They need a match. They don't have to build a bomb," Damphousse said. Often, he said, they are simply frustrated by the political process and decide "let's go do something."

Furthermore where did the person called a "child" talk about veterans? He didn't.
 
Our intelligence groups have for years stated that the biggest threats to national security are domestic groups.

Indeed, there are many for years now that think the al Qaeda threat has been overblown.

(UPI) — The response of U.S. policymakers to the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks is based upon an overestimate of the threat of terrorism, and ignores the lessons that can be gained from an interdisciplinary approach to the problem, according to some think tank experts who are analyzing the issue.

"I basically think we are really overreacting to this in a fairly large way," said George Mason University economist Roger Congleton. "I think it would be useful for the press and the government to be reminded that the risks are not as gigantic as we seem to have been encouraged to believe over the last year."

Michael Wiener (Savage) has been blowing over this for years now.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom