• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Obama's Approval Rating Dips to New Low

Re: Obama sets a new low

LOL he promised just as much lol.. give me a break with this revisionist crap.

The Misery Index steadily declined while Reagan took office.

The Misery Index is soaring under the Messiah.

'nuff said.
 
Re: Obama sets a new low

LOL he promised just as much lol.. give me a break with this revisionist crap.

Post them then. And you should be flogging yourself for the revisionist crap since you're the one attempting the revision.



No squawking about the experience though huh? Good move on your part.
 
Re: Obama sets a new low

Obama's chickens... are com'in home... to roost.

Unfortunately we are paying for his failed ideas.

.
 
Re: Obama sets a new low

Post them then. And you should be flogging yourself for the revisionist crap since you're the one attempting the revision.



No squawking about the experience though huh? Good move on your part.

[ame=http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=safari&rls=en&q=ronald+reagan+promises&aq=0msx&oq=+RReagan+PROMISes&aqi=g-msx1]ronald reagan promises - Google Search[/ame]
 
Last edited:
I think it's rather telling that Bush's poll numbers seemed to carry more weight with a lot of the left when his approval numbers went down. How many times did I see liberals calling Bush supporters "28 percenters" or "dead enders"? Funny how polls suddenly don't seem to matter as much when it's your ox being gored.
 
I think it's rather telling that Bush's poll numbers seemed to carry more weight with a lot of the left when his approval numbers went down. How many times did I see liberals calling Bush supporters "28 percenters" or "dead enders"? Funny how polls suddenly don't seem to matter as much when it's your ox being gored.

I find it funny that you take Poll with a straight face. Hell during bush term, I never took polls with a straight face. I always take them with a grain of slat.
 
Re: Obama sets a new low

See, you didn't post the list of Ronald Reagans promises... you posted a search of the terms "ronald reagan promises".

I'm expecting a list of 500 similar to how this site lists them, though, during Reagans time they didn't have the internet websites to track them. So how about that comprehensive list of promises then?


Ronald Reagan : Biography



PolitiFact | Olbermann says proposed GOP litmus test would freeze out Reagan

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2008/jan/06/rudy-giuliani/yep-reagan-did-the-a-word/



http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2009/dec/17/karl-rove/rove-says-obamas-approval-ratings-after-year-are-w/




It list all the promise he made over his term
 
Last edited:
Re: Obama sets a new low

Not true in any way. Just because they had the same rating doesnt mean both are failures.

You cant just take what you see and ignore the reason behind it.

Sorry but you are a hypocrit. You cant apply one standard to one president and not to another just because he happens to be a right wing hero of the moment.

People are claiming that Obama is a failure and using his approval rating as evidence.

Fine, then that same method must be able to be used for all other presidents.

If it can not be used to say Reagan was a failure then it can not be used for Obama.. fair is fair.
 
Re: Obama sets a new low

The Messiah ain't gonna be one of them.

Reagan knew full well, and told us, that the implementation of his program was going to be painful. In the end, Reagan created an economy that spawned twenty two million mostly private sector jobs.

The Messiah is spawning an economy that's going to keep losing jobs....because he's repeating "the mistakes of the past", ie, socialism, instead of repeating Reagan's policies of success, ie, capitalism.

Yeah, twenty two million jobs at Burger King.:rofl
 
Re: Obama sets a new low

Sorry but you are a hypocrit. You cant apply one standard to one president and not to another just because he happens to be a right wing hero of the moment.

People are claiming that Obama is a failure and using his approval rating as evidence.

Fine, then that same method must be able to be used for all other presidents.

If it can not be used to say Reagan was a failure then it can not be used for Obama.. fair is fair.

What's the approval rating for congress? I would guess about 15%.
 
Re: Obama sets a new low

Sorry but you are a hypocrit. You cant apply one standard to one president and not to another just because he happens to be a right wing hero of the moment.

People are claiming that Obama is a failure and using his approval rating as evidence.

No, I say the Messiah is a failure and use the failed economy and his other failures as evidence.

Reagan was a success because he had the right ideas and implemented them.

The Messiah doesn't have any ideas, he's a community organizer, not a leader of men. His presidency is going to be the failure all his promises told us it was going to be.
 
Re: Obama sets a new low

LOL he promised just as much lol.. give me a break with this revisionist crap.

Tell me P-U: How does one win a 49 state landslide after inheriting stagflation, an economy and military in shambles?

Revisionist: look thyself in the mirror.

Reagan promised 4 things:

1. Cut taxes. He did; closed loopholes and brought the highest rate from 70% to 28%

2. Reduce burdens on the people (regulations). He did. Note one of his first orders was to eliminate oil price controls. What happened? No more oil hysteria. Prices went down.

3. Strengthen the Military. Put the Evil Empire into a race it... lost. Had a vision to defend the nation with a protective shield. It works... even though people thought he was nuts.

4. Cut Spending/deficits. Democrats controlled congress and kept spending... as government revenues soared due to lower unemployement, investment, competition for jobs. As JFK noted... a rising tide lifts all boats.

5. All with the goal of an American Renaissance, and focus on our security.

4 of 5 is pretty good.

You might be well served to watch the following:
http://www.debatepolitics.com/us-pa...l-platforms/63890-sheer-sober-brilliance.html

.
 
Does a presidents approval rating mean anything? Really?

If Bushes were so low, and Obamas are so low, maybe everyone should just WISEN UP?

It's ironic that people even think polling matters. Maybe that poll was done in rural alabama in a republican majority district. Polling is meant to display what the establishment wants public opinion to be.

I don't support Obama. He isn't LIBERAL ENOUGH. ever though about that?
 
Re: Obama sets a new low

Yes, you kool-aid drinkers believe your own lies.

I have no desire to help you.

The kool aid was about the horrors of organized religion. I am a deist and I believe that there are too many charlatans in organized religion.

I have heard that kool aid thing so much that I just want to puke.
 
Re: Obama sets a new low

Tell me P-U: How does one win a 49 state landslide after inheriting stagflation, an economy and military in shambles?

Revisionist: look thyself in the mirror.

Reagan promised 4 things:

1. Cut taxes. He did; closed loopholes and brought the highest rate from 70% to 28%

2. Reduce burdens on the people (regulations). He did. Note one of his first orders was to eliminate oil price controls. What happened? No more oil hysteria. Prices went down.

3. Strengthen the Military. Put the Evil Empire into a race it... lost. Had a vision to defend the nation with a protective shield. It works... even though people thought he was nuts.

4. Cut Spending/deficits. Democrats controlled congress and kept spending... as government revenues soared due to lower unemployement, investment, competition for jobs. As JFK noted... a rising tide lifts all boats.

5. All with the goal of an American Renaissance, and focus on our security.

4 of 5 is pretty good.

You might be well served to watch the following:
http://www.debatepolitics.com/us-pa...l-platforms/63890-sheer-sober-brilliance.html

.

You are talking short term results for Reagan's voodoo economics. Look at what it has led to. The biggest redistribution of wealth from the middle class to the filthy rich.

Yeah, he cut taxes. That's why we have become a debtor nation, sub servant to Communist China. I thought conservatives were against communism. It's ironic that Nixon, the commie fighter, opened this can of worms.

It's all about greed and class discrimination.
 
I find it funny that you take Poll with a straight face. Hell during bush term, I never took polls with a straight face. I always take them with a grain of slat.

Where did I say I took polls at face value? I'd love to see it if you can show it to me.
 
Re: Obama sets a new low

The kool aid was about the horrors of organized religion. I am a deist and I believe that there are too many charlatans in organized religion.

I have heard that kool aid thing so much that I just want to puke.

The desire to puke comes from drinking it.
 
Re: Obama sets a new low

You are talking short term results for Reagan's voodoo economics. Look at what it has led to. The biggest redistribution of wealth from the middle class to the filthy rich.

Yeah, he cut taxes. That's why we have become a debtor nation, sub servant to Communist China. I thought conservatives were against communism. It's ironic that Nixon, the commie fighter, opened this can of worms.

It's all about greed and class discrimination.

Hmm....so you believe that people who earn their own money are creating greed and class discrimination if they hold the truly bizarre expectation that they should be allowed to keep it for themselves....

weird, wrong, but perfectly in-line with the lack of thought, emotion based left wing political mantras the more ignorant people follow these days.

Being older and obviously wiser, I adhere to the tried and true process that "I earned it, it's mine, bugger off" school of reality.
 
Re: Obama sets a new low

You can't have it both ways.

Oh, I think we slobber over these polls to highlight how the Left now makes excuses for their negative numbers and must always deflect to a Reagan/Bush defense.

Most Republicans don't want any President to govern by polls, what we find humorous is that the Left no longer thinks a President should govern by poll numbers either. Maybe we are more alike than we like to admit.
 
Does a presidents approval rating mean anything? Really?

It used to as far as the Left is concerned. I think the Repubs have consistently pointed out Obama's personal numbers don't suffer as much as the dislike of his policies...that mirror the Left's.

If Bushes were so low, and Obamas are so low, maybe everyone should just WISEN UP?

You mean stop expecting Presidents to govern by the whims of polls?

It's ironic that people even think polling matters. Maybe that poll was done in rural alabama in a republican majority district. Polling is meant to display what the establishment wants public opinion to be.

Where were you last administration?

I don't support Obama. He isn't LIBERAL ENOUGH. ever though about that?

I don't support him either. He's a circus clown.
 
Re: Obama sets a new low

Hmm....so you believe that people who earn their own money are creating greed and class discrimination if they hold the truly bizarre expectation that they should be allowed to keep it for themselves....

weird, wrong, but perfectly in-line with the lack of thought, emotion based left wing political mantras the more ignorant people follow these days.

Being older and obviously wiser, I adhere to the tried and true process that "I earned it, it's mine, bugger off" school of reality.

Yeah I guess you would prefer a government like Haiti where it's survival of the fittest. That's about on par with a wing nut social Darwinist.
 
Back
Top Bottom