• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Sarah Palin to Contribute to Fox News

liblady said:
number one again? is there some contest i don't know about?

psst....republicans really aren't stupid enough to nominate palin. or are they?
Click to expand...

Damm right we are stupid enough and she WILL be our next president.
 
disneydude said:
Advertising depends on a lot of things. One of the main ones is the demographics of the viewer. Advertisers generally want the 18-49 year old crowd. I suspect that Fauxnews probably does not do well in the demographic group.
Also the area of the country is also controlling. Again, I suspect that most FauxNews viewers come from the more sparsely populated red states.
The larger cities where more commerce is conducted are generally more democratic and thus probably more appealing to advertisers.

I'm certain that Life Insurance, Viagra, hearing aids, etc...probably sell very well for the Fox Advertiser.
Click to expand...

You suspect incorrectly:

The demographics were even worse: CNN lost 13% of its primetime 25-54 year olds, while Fox was up 47%. MSNBC was down 7%. In 18-49s, Fox gained 42%, CNN lost 16% and MSNBC lost 11%. Fox gains may be attributed the red meat that anti-healthcare conservatives are throwing into the pit, or by the enormous success of Glen Beck, who joined Fox this year.

Total day demographics were scarcely better: Fox was up 38% in 25-54 year olds, CNN was down 1%, and MSNBC lost 29%. In 18-49s, Fox was 32% up, CNN 3% down, and MSNBC 23% down.
Click to expand...
source

That's what happens when you pull "suspicions" out of your arse.
 
Tom Jones said:
Well, an easy answer would be that liberals fear her goodness - but the reality of it is they fear their own unwholesomeness when confronted with someone like her.
Click to expand...

:rofl Seriously? Be careful not to fall off that pedestal you are standing on.

You also forgot to mention that at night she hunts and kills liberals who try to sneak into peoples houses and eat their babies.
 
Gibberish said:
:
You also forgot to mention that at night she hunts and kills liberals who try to sneak into peoples houses and eat their babies.
Click to expand...

Now you're exaggerating. She does not do that.
 
Gill said:
You suspect incorrectly:


source

That's what happens when you pull "suspicions" out of your arse.
Click to expand...

I'd be interested in seeing the actually numbers. Being up 38% v. being down 14% doesn't really tell us anything. It depends where you numbers started and where they are now.
 
disneydude said:
I'd be interested in seeing the actually numbers. Being up 38% v. being down 14% doesn't really tell us anything. It depends where you numbers started and where they are now.
Click to expand...

Here you go...

Fox News has pulled off another dominant quarter, claiming the top 10 cable news programs in 3Q 2009 and growing against 3Q 2008, while CNN and MSNBC lost substantial portions of their election-boom audience.

Fox News averaged 2.25 million total viewers in prime time for the third quarter, up 2% over the previous year. That's more than CNN (946,000, down 30%) and MSNBC (788,000, down 10%) combined.

"The O'Reilly Factor" led all cable news programs with an average of 3.295 million total viewers for the quarter, up 12% over the previous year. "Hannity" (2.603 million, up 9%), "Glenn Beck" (2.403 million, up 89%), "On the Record with Greta van Susteren" (2.150 million, up 16%), and "Special Report with Bret Baier" (1.997 million, up 20%) rounded out the top five.
Click to expand...
Source

Go to the source if you want to see a breakdown of the numbers, but it ain't pretty if you're a Fox News hater. O'Reilly reruns at 11:00 beat the highest rated show on any other cable news network.
 
Crosscheck said:
You even know what a Nazi is? Or did you attend school with Sarah?
Click to expand...

LOL - of course I know what a nazi is - everybody knows that nazis are socialist facists - and everybody knows that liberals are socialist facists- therefore, everybody knows that liberals are nazis.
 
disneydude said:
I'd be interested in seeing the actually numbers. Being up 38% v. being down 14% doesn't really tell us anything. It depends where you numbers started and where they are now.
Click to expand...

You lose again DD......:rofl
 
Tom Jones said:
LOL - of course I know what a nazi is - everybody knows that nazis are socialist facists - and everybody knows that liberals are socialist facists- therefore, everybody knows that liberals are nazis.
Click to expand...

You sir, project the mental giantism of every Sarah Q. Palin supporter.
 
Gill said:
And you sir, project the self-perceived mental superiority typical of most Palin haters.
Click to expand...

Do you really believe all liberals are nazis?

You should read stories from a Holocaust survivor and open that mind.
 
Crosscheck said:
Do you really believe all liberals are nazis?

You should read stories from a Holocaust survivor and open that mind.
Click to expand...

Did I mention the word Nazi anywhere in this thread or any other??
 
Gill said:
Did I mention the word Nazi anywhere in this thread or any other??
Click to expand...

Were you not defending your buddy's view that all liberals are Nazis? Or do you just jump in a thread wihtout any knowledge of what is being debated?
 
Crosscheck said:
Were you not defending your buddy's view that all liberals are Nazis? Or do you just jump in a thread wihtout any knowledge of what is being debated?
Click to expand...

No, if you had read what I posted, you would have seen that I was disputing your hyper-partisan opinion of Palin and her supporters.

And... if you been reading this thread, you would know that I have been posting in it for some time now, so I'm well aware of your partisan tactics.
 
Tom Jones said:
LOL - of course I know what a nazi is - everybody knows that nazis are socialist facists - and everybody knows that liberals are socialist facists- therefore, everybody knows that liberals are nazis.
Click to expand...

Are you making a joke or do your not know what you're talking about?

I mean, your statement is so completely wrong that I first thought you had to be making a joke, an ironic statement making fun of the ignorance of the far-right.

Socialism and fascism are on opposite sides of the political spectrum. The nazis called themselves national socialists, but that was propaganda as they were a fascist dictatorship.

Perhaps the chart below will help you get better informed and save you from sounding like an idiot.

European-political-spectrum.png
 
Gill said:
No, if you had read what I posted, you would have seen that I was disputing your hyper-partisan opinion of Palin and her supporters.

And... if you been reading this thread, you would know that I have been posting in it for some time now, so I'm well aware of your partisan tactics.
Click to expand...

So what do you think of the Palin supporter thinking that all liberals are Nazis.
Is that the people you want in your camp?
Nevermind, just use one of your typical right winger debate tactic and just pic a icon such as :rofl.
 
Crosscheck said:
So what do you think of the Palin supporter thinking that all liberals are Nazis.
Is that the people you want in your camp?
Nevermind, just use one of your typical right winger debate tactic and just pic a icon such as :rofl.
Click to expand...

How is that different than your absurd claim that all Palin supporters are idiots??
 
Gill said:
How is that different than your absurd claim that all Palin supporters are idiots??
Click to expand...

Did he really say that? We are not all idiots.
 
Tom Jones said:
Well, an easy answer would be that liberals fear her goodness - but the reality of it is they fear their own unwholesomeness when confronted with someone like her.
Click to expand...
liberals fear her goodness? LMAO! good one!
 
Gill said:
How is that different than your absurd claim that all Palin supporters are idiots??
Click to expand...

Thank you for supplying the example.

Debate done.
 
Crosscheck said:
Thank you for supplying the example.

Debate done.
Click to expand...

The truth hurts doesn't it. Libs can't stand it when their own hate is thrown back into their faces.

Defeating you was too easy... adios.
 
hazlnut said:
The nazis called themselves national socialists, but that was propaganda as they were a fascist dictatorship.
Click to expand...


Exactly - the nazis did exactly what the liberals are doing - the liberals call themselves socialists, but in reality they are facists - the nazis enslaved Jews and other 'undedirables' and the liberals have enslaved the Blacks and now the Hispanics - keeping them down with welfare for votes
 
Why did God give all of us free will except politicians? God tells them what to do.
 
liblady said:
liberals fear her goodness? LMAO! good one!
Click to expand...

Liberals fear her goodness to the point that they hate her - they have hate in their hearts for the woman, and their hate was there before the woman.

Some reasons why I believe liberals hate Sarah Palin:

She's pretty.

She's a confident woman.

She's strong.

She's successful.

She does a woman's right to have a family and a career better than they could even imagine.

She has a handsome husband.

She has a helpful husband.

She has a husband who is flexible with his career for his wife rather than a competing career.

Her marriage is a terrific role model.

She does feminism better than feminist wannabees.

She is a great feminist role model.

She has a great, liberated, can-do attitude that makes liberal's look pale in comparison.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom