• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

LA Times: Obama stimulus spending: $246,436 per new job

And you actually believe this comment debunks the multiplier? :lol:

I'm not trying to debunk the multiplier, just showing that money is better spent by consumers and producers.
 
Are we discussing the keynesian multiplier?

Or are we discussing funny math?

Or are these actually one in the same?:doh
 
I'm not trying to debunk the multiplier, just showing that money is better spent by consumers and producers.

The bold is a vital aspect of the fiscal multiplier.


Goldenboy219 said:
Just giving people money creates a much weaker multiplier effect. Can you explain why Tony?
 
I'm not trying to debunk the multiplier, just showing that money is better spent by consumers and producers.

Well, of course it is. But they aren't spending enough now, because too many have no jobs, and the rest are afraid they will lose them so they are hoarding their cash. That's why the government temporarily steps in.
 
Well, of course it is. But they aren't spending enough now, because too many have no jobs, and the rest are afraid they will lose them so they are hoarding their cash. That's why the government temporarily steps in.

The government never, and I mean NEVER, "temporarily steps in"!:doh
 
Well, of course it is. But they aren't spending enough now, because too many have no jobs, and the rest are afraid they will lose them so they are hoarding their cash. That's why the government temporarily steps in.

"Hoarded" means it is saved, and what is the function of saved money?
 
The government never, and I mean NEVER, "temporarily steps in"!:doh

More lame platitudes.

Yes, the government does step in temporarily and then shuts down a program when it is no longer needed or cannot be sustained. You just don't remember those because they are gone.

You think this stimulus will become a permanent program? Really?
 
"Hoarded" means it is saved, and what is the function of saved money?

You tell me, and I'll tell you why it also doesn't matter in a deep recession.
 
More lame platitudes.

Yes, the government does step in temporarily and then shuts down a program when it is no longer needed or cannot be sustained. You just don't remember those because they are gone.

You think this stimulus will become a permanent program? Really?

Yes, this is why many states fought the stimulus in the first place.

O.k....you're up....
 
You tell me, and I'll tell you why it also doesn't matter in a deep recession.

I already told you and you agreed with me that not all companies are failing during a recession right?
 
"Hoarded" means it is saved, and what is the function of saved money?

Again your error is in regards to time frame. Savings fuels long run growth. :2wave:
 
Yes, this is why many states fought the stimulus in the first place.

O.k....you're up....

So? They were wrong just like you are. Funny how they are all taking the money now. Why don't they just refuse it?
 
Again your error is in regards to time frame. Savings fuels long run growth. :2wave:

Yeah, kind of hard to take out a loan for a business when nobody's buying anything.
 
Again your error is in regards to time frame. Savings fuels long run growth. :2wave:

And the problem during a recession is that credit is hard to come by right? Well what would be the function of an increase in savings? With free banking, would that make loans easier to get again?
 
So? They were wrong just like you are. Funny how they are all taking the money now. Why don't they just refuse it?

I answered your question, and your response is "so?":confused:
 
And the problem during a recession is that credit is hard to come by right?

No, actually, it's that people don't want credit because they aren't doing business because there aren't any customers.
 
I answered your question, and your response is "so?":confused:

No, it was "So? They were wrong just like you are. Funny how they are all taking the money now. Why don't they just refuse it?"
 
Yeah, kind of hard to take out a loan for a business when nobody's buying anything.

No it is not, many have to take out loans for payroll, so they can then hopefully survive the downturn. Unfortuanatley though, when the government has all the paper, this makes that all the more difficult.
 
Don't be so sloppy with the way you describe the economy.

Excuse me. But I think you knew what I meant. Sorry for being not boring when I write.
 
No, it was "So? They were wrong just like you are. Funny how they are all taking the money now. Why don't they just refuse it?"

Some have, have they not?
 
No it is not, many have to take out loans for payroll, so they can then hopefully survive the downturn. Unfortuanatley though, when the government has all the paper, this makes that all the more difficult.

Is credit hard to get now because the government has all the paper though?
 
Back
Top Bottom