• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Breaking: Obama’s “Safe Schools Czar” Is Promoting Child Porn in the Classroom

What facts? It's an opinion piece. Did you not see the big bold letters that say OPINION at the top of the article? :doh

Read and dispute the facts he puts forth. You have nothing and show it by always condemning the source and not addressing the points and facts in the articles.
 
It is the truth. Are you saying homosexuals are not showing an agenda that they want to be seen as normal as the wiki article states?

I am saying that this "homosexual agenda" is totally fabricated crap by anti-homosexuals and, for the purposes of this discussion, is just more bull**** you are trying to peddle.
 
Read and dispute the facts he puts forth. You have nothing and show it by always condemning the source and not addressing the points and facts in the articles.

If he put forth facts it wouldn't be in the OPINION section. I wouldn't condemn the source if you brought forth a legitimate source. Unfortunately for you, OPINION doesn't fall into that category.
 
Yet at the age of 5 they start teaching acceptance of gays and that it is normal.

Perhaps they teach acceptance, which is good because whether you like it or not...gay people are a part of our society. However, I don't see how they are trying to teach it as normal. Obviously being gay is neither normal or abnormal considering that normal is a subjective term. What is normal to one person isn't necessarily the same for another and so on.
 
Read and dispute the facts he puts forth. You have nothing and show it by always condemning the source and not addressing the points and facts in the articles.

Do you know the difference between OPINION and FACTS?

Obviously not.
 
Wait, stop the presses. I found the Gay Agenda:

6:00 am Gym
8:00 am Breakfast (oatmeal and egg whites)
9:00 am Hair appointment
10:00 am Shopping
12:00 PM Brunch

2:00 PM
1) Assume complete control of the U.S. Federal, State and Local Governments as well as all other national governments,
2) Recruit all straight youngsters to our debauched lifestyle,
3) Destroy all healthy heterosexual marriages,
4) Replace all school counselors in grades K-12 with agents of Colombian and Jamaican drug cartels,
5) Establish planetary chain of homo breeding gulags where over-medicated imprisoned straight women are turned into artificially impregnated baby factories to produce prepubescent love slaves for our devotedly pederastic gay leadership,
6) bulldoze all houses of worship, and
7) Secure total control of the INTERNET and all mass media for the exclusive use of child pornographers.

2:30 PM Get forty winks of beauty rest to prevent facial wrinkles from stress of world conquest
4:00 PM Cocktails
6:00 PM Light Dinner (soup, salad, with Chardonnay)
8:00 PM Theater
11:00 PM Bed (du jour)"
 
I am saying that this "homosexual agenda" is totally fabricated crap by anti-homosexuals and, for the purposes of this discussion, is just more bull**** you are trying to peddle.

Yet we see it in the schools and Jennings has proven it.
 

This is such a failure on so many levels. One psychologist is hardly convincing. The article is an opinion piece with a heavily slanted view. Let's look at a quote:

In 1973, the same year that the Supreme Court legalized abortions, the American Psychiatric Association removed homosexuality as a disorder from its diagnostic manual. Their reasoning was based primarily on genuine empathy and political pressure, but virtually no scientific data...Dr. Charles Socarides, an APA task force member, now admits that removing homosexuality as a diagnosis disregarded 70 years of research showing the grave risks of homosexual activity, including the emergence of an "addictive component."

So, first we are talking about the change in the APA stance in the same sentence as mentioning legalized abortion, despite the fact they have nothing in common. Then it brings up the same tired lie about the change in the APA stance being wrong. Let's see what the APA(which is much more than 1 pschologist) have to say on homosexuality:APA Help Center - Health & Emotional Wellness - "Sexual Orientation, Homosexuality and Bisexuality"

No. Psychologists, psychiatrists, and other mental health professionals agree that homosexuality is not an illness, a mental disorder, or an emotional problem. More than 35 years of objective, well-designed scientific research has shown that homosexuality, in and itself, is not associated with mental disorders or emotional or social problems. Homosexuality was once thought to be a mental illness because mental health professionals and society had biased information.

In the past, the studies of gay, lesbian, and bisexual people involved only those in therapy, thus biasing the resulting conclusions. When researchers examined data about such people who were not in therapy, the idea that homosexuality was a mental illness was quickly found to be untrue.

In 1973 the American Psychiatric Association confirmed the importance of the new, better-designed research and removed homosexuality from the official manual that lists mental and emotional disorders. Two years later, the American Psychological Association passed a resolution supporting this removal.

So much for that piece of crap opinion piece you posted to try and boost your point.
 
Perhaps they teach acceptance, which is good because whether you like it or not...gay people are a part of our society. However, I don't see how they are trying to teach it as normal. Obviously being gay is neither normal or abnormal considering that normal is a subjective term. What is normal to one person isn't necessarily the same for another and so on.

Acceptance saying it is normal
 
Acceptance saying it is normal

Uh...no, not at all. Accepting diversity. If one were to accept that it is "normal" then everyone would be gay. :doh

Try again.
 
There are facts in an opinion piece

Oh, you mean the parts that you agree with? :lol:

That's interesting. So apparently, an opinion is an opinion until you agree with it and then it becomes a fact.
 
That states facts and experiences of a psychologist.

It's funny that you can't seem to find any unbiased or non-opinion piece articles to back up your assertions.
 
This is such a failure on so many levels. One psychologist is hardly convincing. The article is an opinion piece with a heavily slanted view. Let's look at a quote:



So, first we are talking about the change in the APA stance in the same sentence as mentioning legalized abortion, despite the fact they have nothing in common. Then it brings up the same tired lie about the change in the APA stance being wrong. Let's see what the APA(which is much more than 1 pschologist) have to say on homosexuality:APA Help Center - Health & Emotional Wellness - "Sexual Orientation, Homosexuality and Bisexuality"



So much for that piece of crap opinion piece you posted to try and boost your point.

Shows there is disagreement with the APA in their field of expertise. I agree with him and he is right the research did not matter being PC is why the APA did that.
 
That states facts and experiences of a psychologist.

It states opinion of a rogue professional who has broken ranks with every professional organization in his field.

It's still an opinion piece. Try again.
 
I agree with him and he is right the research did not matter being PC is why the APA did that.

Which is an OPINION.

Obviously you are incapable of discerning the differences between facts and opinions.
 
Please read your own source material. It talks of charges be made by social conservatives. The article does not say that Jennings has power over any children. You just made that up.

So Jennings and the GLSEN have had no influence on teaching about gays in school? GLSEN also brought us the day of silence.
 
So Jennings and the GLSEN have had no influence on teaching about gays in school? GLSEN also brought us the day of silence.

Did you have a point or were you just blathering out more random irrelevancies?
 
Because this what this thread is about. The gays agenda in our schools. I see nothing that these facts are being taught in the schools. Should students not also know the risks gays face?

What risks? You admit the gay agenda is just about being accepted, what is harmful in that. The risk that idiots on the internet will be offended by them?
 
Shows there is disagreement with the APA in their field of expertise. I agree with him and he is right the research did not matter being PC is why the APA did that.

And my link(you know, the one that did not go to one psychologists opinion piece but went to an actual legit source) explained the difference in research that resulted in the change in stance the APA made. I even bolded that portion for you.
 
Back
Top Bottom