• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Breaking: Obama’s “Safe Schools Czar” Is Promoting Child Porn in the Classroom

EpicDude86 said:
What's the third orifice? Hand wrapped in plastic bag and petroleum jelly? fleshlight? Nasal cavity?
Click to expand...

hell I even provided a visual reference.. umm ok, you need to attend one of the GLSEN events to get educated.



Edit: It is high time for this thread to become basement fodder.
 
Last edited:
marduc said:
hell I even provided a visual reference.. umm ok, you need to attend one of the GLSEN events to get educated.
Click to expand...

Men have two orifices, when you remove the Anal, you are left with 1. 1 is half of 2. Am I missing something??
 
EpicDude86 said:
Men have two orifices, when you remove the Anal, you are left with 1. 1 is half of 2. Am I missing something??
Click to expand...

yeah a sentence construction that made it readily apparent that you were referring solely to male orifices instead of a vaginal reference that made it appear that you were comparing viable orifices between the 2 sexes.
 
Redress said:
So you support a nanny state? Odd notion for a conservative. Since we are going to stop people from doing risky things, hunting better go away(hunting accidents) and in fact all guns(accidental shootings). Better outlaw cars, they are dangerous.

Let's go a bit further, since marriage is the number 1 requirement for divorce, we better outlaw marriage in order to save marriage. We don't want to risk those divorces.
Click to expand...

Nice spin but not funny
 
jallman said:
You're not even making any sense. It's not a promotion of homosexuality. It's a show of solidarity against bullying and prejudice. Do you even ****ing read the goddamned articles you cite or do you just dither through the interwebz saying "Derrrrr, that one looks like it talks about teh gay. Derrrrrr."

Goddamn at least try to avoid smoking meth before you post and maybe you won't come off as being a paranoid dip****.
Click to expand...

It is an excuse to indoctrinate kids in the homosexual agenda so society will accept their immoral lifestyle.
 
Dr_Patrick said:
I said that it was biased. Obviously you don't understand the concept of bias. See, just because I call their article biased doesn't necessarily mean that I am biased against Christians. You don't even know me, nor do you know of any agenda that I may or may not have. I simply asked you to post an unbiased link, which you have failed repeatedly to do. The ball is in your court.
Click to expand...

No one has showed the link false
 
Dr_Patrick said:
You have yet to prove it is a harmful lifestyle. And you are changing the subject. Regardless, I am of the opinion that people should be allowed to do drugs if they harm no one. The fact that you would actually compare being gay to doing cocaine pretty much says it all.
Click to expand...

You will not accept the proof it is bias according to you.That is a cop out to not address the facts of the link.
 
ptif219 said:
Nice spin but not funny
Click to expand...

Then what are you trying to say? If we have to protect gays from being gay, because it is dangerous, then why stop at gays? Just because they are the ones you don't like?
 
ptif219 said:
It is an excuse to indoctrinate kids in the homosexual agenda so society will accept their immoral lifestyle.
Click to expand...

What is the homosexual agenda, and what part of it do you disagree with?
 
marduc said:
yes, it is your body, your choice.

Edit to to show how silly this argument is:

If I can afford a triple stack cheeseburger and a large fry everyday, should I be allowed to do it even though it is undoubtedly a harmful lifestyle.
Click to expand...

Yet there are those trying to make laws against that.
 
The story seems a little out of context. It makes claims of the material "explicit descriptions of sex acts between pre-schoolers; stories that seemed to promote and recommend child-adult sexual relationships; stories of public masturbation, anal sex in restrooms, affairs between students and teachers, five-year-olds playing sex games, semen flying through the air" but it doesn't cite specifically which books had that material or the context in which it was presented. You virtually have to read all the books they claimed to have read yourself in order to determine whether they are sensationalizing the material. Why didn't they simply use quotes from the books?
 
Leo said:
I got lost trying to follow 13 pages of assertion and counter-assertion, but the message I got from the OP is that someone is trying to push a gay agenda and pornography onto high school kids. As someone in my last years of high school, can I just make two points which I think are of relevance.

1. High school kids know more about sex than anyone is prepared to acknowledge, so no books are going to push them into sex before they are ready. (You don't do sex because someone tells you about it.)

2. It is not possible to turn anyone gay, no matter what. Not literature, nor indoctrination, nor even molestation, will turn someone gay. As a male, you cannot respond sexually to the same gender, if you are not already that way.

So I think the whole biz is a storm in a teacup. :mrgreen:
Click to expand...

You have proof for those statements?
 
Redress said:
Then what are you trying to say? If we have to protect gays from being gay, because it is dangerous, then why stop at gays? Just because they are the ones you don't like?
Click to expand...

Read my link it tells of diseases and depression this costs all taxpayers if they can not afford treatment.
 
Redress said:
What is the homosexual agenda, and what part of it do you disagree with?
Click to expand...

That gay is normal and it is ok to be gay. Go back 30 years and that was not the case. Go back 15 or 20 years and sodomy was illegal in most states. In recent years to be PC laws have changed that make gays seem less immoral. The truth is we had right all through history and the recent history to give gays special rights is where we are wrong.
 
CriticalThought said:
The story seems a little out of context. It makes claims of the material "explicit descriptions of sex acts between pre-schoolers; stories that seemed to promote and recommend child-adult sexual relationships; stories of public masturbation, anal sex in restrooms, affairs between students and teachers, five-year-olds playing sex games, semen flying through the air" but it doesn't cite specifically which books had that material or the context in which it was presented. You virtually have to read all the books they claimed to have read yourself in order to determine whether they are sensationalizing the material. Why didn't they simply use quotes from the books?
Click to expand...

In what school do you think this acceptable to teach minors.
 
ptif219 said:
You will not accept the proof it is bias according to you.That is a cop out to not address the facts of the link.
Click to expand...

It is biased considering that it is from an agenda-driven religious website. I would say the same of any other agenda-driven website. And yet you are still failing to provide unbiased proof.
 
ptif219 said:
That gay is normal and it is ok to be gay. Go back 30 years and that was not the case. Go back 15 or 20 years and sodomy was illegal in most states. In recent years to be PC laws have changed that make gays seem less immoral. The truth is we had right all through history and the recent history to give gays special rights is where we are wrong.
Click to expand...

Define normal. Plus, how exactly does it affect you if two people of the same sex are in love with each other and in a relationship? It's really none of your business. And by the way, it's called progression and it's inevitable. Get used to it. :2wave:
 
Dr_Patrick said:
It is biased considering that it is from an agenda-driven religious website. I would say the same of any other agenda-driven website. And yet you are still failing to provide unbiased proof.
Click to expand...

Show where the article is false
 
Dr_Patrick said:
Define normal. Plus, how exactly does it affect you if two people of the same sex are in love with each other and in a relationship? It's really none of your business. And by the way, it's called progression and it's inevitable. Get used to it. :2wave:
Click to expand...

When they force it on 5 year old children. I have a gay family member. The point is she doesn't talk about it and we do not discuss it. We also accept her partner at family functions.

If gays would just live their lives and stop making demands no one would care. The point is you are trying to force society to accept gays as normal when most of the country does not see gay that way.
 
ptif219 said:
That gay is normal and it is ok to be gay. Go back 30 years and that was not the case. Go back 15 or 20 years and sodomy was illegal in most states. In recent years to be PC laws have changed that make gays seem less immoral. The truth is we had right all through history and the recent history to give gays special rights is where we are wrong.
Click to expand...

Being gay is, if not normal, not particularly exceptional. Lots of people are gay, somewhere in the 5 % to 10 % range. They are less exceptional than, for example, redheads.

It is ok to be gay. You may not like it, but who really cares what you like. There is nothing wrong with being gay, gay people are harming no one.
 
ptif219 said:
Read my link it tells of diseases and depression this costs all taxpayers if they can not afford treatment.
Click to expand...

The same can be said for any one who does anything the least bit risky. Why are you singling out gays?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom