• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Breaking: Obama’s “Safe Schools Czar” Is Promoting Child Porn in the Classroom

I really don't see a problem here. It's a private organization and they're only recommendations. It's not like anyone is being forced to read anything. Some of them might be inappropriate for kids at a certain age, but that's why there's a warning on the website that parents/adults should review the material first.
 
In the article some of the quotes from the book sound like porn to me.
they are descriptions of sexual encounters, not fantasy. appropriate for kids? maybe not, but who is being forced to read these books?
 
Why do I want to buy this filth?

Filth? What is filthy about them? Please show us your in depth knowledge of the books. You can start by referencing something more then what people tell you is them.
 
This is disgusting.


Gateway Pundit


What we discovered shocked us. We were flabbergasted. Rendered speechless.

We were unprepared for what we encountered. Book after book after book contained stories and anecdotes that weren’t merely X-rated and pornographic, but which featured explicit descriptions of sex acts between pre-schoolers; stories that seemed to promote and recommend child-adult sexual relationships; stories of public masturbation, anal sex in restrooms, affairs between students and teachers, five-year-olds playing sex games, semen flying through the air. One memoir even praised becoming a prostitute as a way to increase one’s self-esteem. Above all, the books seemed to have less to do with promoting tolerance than with an unabashed attempt to indoctrinate students into a hyper-sexualized worldview.

We knew that unless we carefully documented what we were reading, the public would have a hard time accepting it. Mere descriptions on our part could not convey the emotional gut reaction one gets when seeing what Kevin Jennings wants kids to read as school assignments. So we began scanning pages from each of the books, and then made exact transcriptions of the relevant passages on each page.

Are we exaggerating, or misconstruing quotes that could be interpreted a different way? No: Read the passages below and judge for yourself. There’s no wiggle room. The language is explicit, the intent clear.

To be specific, the books we read were:

Queer 13

Being Different

The Full Spectrum

Revolutionary Voices

Reflections of a Rock Lobster

Passages of Pride

Growing Up Gay/Growing Up Lesbian

The Order of the Poison Oak

In Your Face

Mama’s Boy, Preacher’s Son

Love & Sex: Ten Stories of Truth

We can only vouch for what’s in these 11 books, since these are the only ones we’ve read through. Are there other books on the GLSEN reading list that are similarly outrageous? We can’t say for sure, but it seems very likely. What you see excerpted below is probably only the tip of the iceberg.

Let it be clear: This issue has nothing to do with gayness or straightness, which is irrelevant to this report. The point proven here is that the GLSEN reading list promotes the sexualization of children in general, regardless of the “orientation.”

So what did any of this have to do with child porn?
 
Is there an equal amount of heterosexual porn being read to balance this? :roll:
 
I think Back Door Sluts 9 is an excellent reference material for High Schoolers in learning about ways to not get your bitch pregnant. Condoms + Anal, 99.99% effective.
 
Is there an equal amount of heterosexual porn being read to balance this? :roll:

.....if you find any of those books to be pornographic without so much as reading them your threshold for what is pornographic is not too far from Janet's Superbowl Nipple.
 
Which is more dangerous, protecting our youth from knowledge about sex that they will eventually learn anyway, or protecting them from knowledge about a corrupt government?
 
Last edited:
Which is more dangerous, protecting our youth from knowledge about sex that they will eventually learn anyway, or protecting them from knowledge about a corrupt government?

you've gotta be careful there, the children learning about one could quite easily lead to them learning about the other
 
Which is more dangerous, protecting our youth from knowledge about sex that they will eventually learn anyway, or protecting them from knowledge about a corrupt government?

Knowing is half the battle.

But those books, they didn't look like child porn to me. So how is there claim to wanting to promote child porn in school?
 
I really don't see a problem here. It's a private organization and they're only recommendations. It's not like anyone is being forced to read anything. Some of them might be inappropriate for kids at a certain age, but that's why there's a warning on the website that parents/adults should review the material first.

They are a teachers organization that has influence in the schools and with the children
 
they are descriptions of sexual encounters, not fantasy. appropriate for kids? maybe not, but who is being forced to read these books?

Hard to say since they will not tell parents and the GLSEN is a teachers organization that is in the schools
 
Filth? What is filthy about them? Please show us your in depth knowledge of the books. You can start by referencing something more then what people tell you is them.

So whats on the Op is a lie? There was stuff on the op I did not post because it was so sexually explicit.
 
Last edited:
.....if you find any of those books to be pornographic without so much as reading them your threshold for what is pornographic is not too far from Janet's Superbowl Nipple.

So I have to watch pornography to know what it is?
 
The OP twists the truth concerning the literature found on GLSEN's reading list. But before providing my 2-cents worth, let me state for the record I had never heard of GLSEN until just one hour ago when upon finding this thread I did some research on the orginzation. For those who may be interested, you can learn more about this organization at their website, GLSEN. From there, you can click on the eductor link to find their reading list.

The "list" isn't a casual book list persa. It's a summary review of sorts of the books GLSEN recommends to educators as reference material to help children of all ages better cop with some of the more sexually oriented aspects of their lives ranging from a young child who has two same-sex parents to child sexual abuse to dealing with questions concerning gender, sexuality and sexual-orientation. And yes, some of the reading material is very graphic in nature. However, as I eluded to concerning the OP, I don't believe neither GLSEN nor it's president, Kevin Jennings, are promoting child pornography in the classroom, but instead are attempting to make literature that addresses the different aspects of gender, sexuality, sexual abuse and sexual orientation available to educators, parents, students of all ages who have problems discussing these delicate yet troubling issues.

Now, to the OP. Most (if not all) of the books mentioned therein are on the 7-12 reading list, not the K-6 reading list. Furthermore, as far as I've been able to determine none of the books are in public school libraries. (Of course, I could be wrong, but I doubt it since a "reading list" is just that - a list.) Therefore, I believe the OP as well as the thread title is purposefully misleading. To be fair, this isn't the first time GLSEN has promoted their recommended reading list to the public school system. In fact, from what I've been able to discover, the National Education Association has been accepting books from GLSEN's reading list for years. But, of course, it's not until Mr. Jennings becomes the President's Schools Czar does anyone pay attention to the matter. :roll:

As to my personal opinion on the matter, there's no way I'd support some of the literature recommended by GLSEN in public school libraries. As this linked website I've provided details, some of the recommended literature is quite graphic indeed and would support some of the concerns mentioned in the OP. But, the OP does over aggsagerate the issue at hand. If given the opportunity my vote would be "nay" on allowing the literature summarized on the linked website to be available on school library shelves. However, I wouldn't have a problem with school counselors or librarians having a list of such literature as a reference source to parents and/or students who are having problems coping with such subject matter material. For me, it's a matter of venue, not content I find troubling. Based on what I've discovered in my brief research, I just don't think such material should be available at public schools, but making such literature available at public and/or college libraries would be fine. Just not in public schools.

Bottom Line: I wouldn't go balistic over this unless and until you've actually found a few of the more disturbing books on the libary shelf at your child's public school. Until then, it's just a list...nothing more. Maybe you segment the list to "speciality reading", but until such material finds its way onto public school library shelves, I don't think we have much of a problem here. Besides, there are students out there who are having difficult times dealing with such subject matter issues. I see no problem with them being able to go to a librarian as recommended by their guidence counselor (or even their teacher) and asking for the appropriate literature to help them better deal with their problem. But in all cases involving students K-12, the parent should ALWAYS be involved.
 
Last edited:
So sexual explicit material given to kids is ok in your eyes

While it is becoming apparently clear to most people here you don't read what people write, you just assume whatever you wish to be true, blatantly making up crap doesn't make you a good poster.
 
But, of course, it's not until Mr. Jennings becomes the President's Schools Czar does anyone pay attention to the matter.

Well he is gay, so he must be teaching our kids about homosexuals and lesbians omgd they are teaching our kids about tolerance of gays..." He laso is going to teach are kids about Sex and Sex is evil so we shouldn't teach our kids about it......[/ end of major sarcasm]

I find it amusing as well that they have just now noticed that we get our recommended list from the site. :rofl



I find nothing wrong with teaching our kids about tolerance ectt. I wouldn't let a 5 year old read the high school list. However, I would like my High schooler read things like that, since during High school I read books with Omgd SEX in it. I will let my 6 year old learn about matting habit of penguins, if its part of her lessons.


So I have to watch pornography to know what it is?
Without reading any of the books, how can you judge, if they are porno?
 
Knowing is half the battle.

But those books, they didn't look like child porn to me. So how is there claim to wanting to promote child porn in school?

Who knows? I haven't read any of them, but I doubt that they have child porn in them, else the authors would have been arrested long ago...
 
While it is becoming apparently clear to most people here you don't read what people write, you just assume whatever you wish to be true, blatantly making up crap doesn't make you a good poster.

Nice spin but it is apparent to me people would rather protect GLSEN than stand up for the kids
 
Nice spin but it is apparent to me people would rather protect GLSEN than stand up for the kids

Well if you would make a case for how kids are actually being harmed without using a known tabloid site like WorldnutDaily, perhaps people would stand up for them.

However, this isn't whats happening.
 
Well if you would make a case for how kids are actually being harmed without using a known tabloid site like WorldnutDaily, perhaps people would stand up for them.

However, this isn't whats happening.

Yet the kids welfare here is not considered only protecting Obama's people and gay organizations.

There was things on the link I did not post because it was to explicit that came from these books.
 
Yet the kids welfare here is not considered only protecting Obama's people and gay organizations.

There was things on the link I did not post because it was to explicit that came from these books.

I dont believe anything WorldnutDaily puts out.

If you can verify this through another source, by all means, do so. Otherwise, consider it dead in the water.

This isn't about protecting anyone. It's about hysteria fabricated by a tabloid.
 
I dont believe anything WorldnutDaily puts out.

If you can verify this through another source, by all means, do so. Otherwise, consider it dead in the water.

This isn't about protecting anyone. It's about hysteria fabricated by a tabloid.

What WND are you talking about?
 
What WND are you talking about?

The referenced blog is affiliated with the same organization that sponsors Worldnut. The Foundation for Religion and Life or something.

Those are worldnut authors.
 
Non of these are Homosexual porn, I have read a lot of these books. They teach our kids about different things. Slaughterhouse five is about the slaughter house reformations in safety. Please read some of the books before you judge them. Oh and these are the high school books not kid books.

Slaughterhouse 5 is about the Allied fire-bombing of Dresden, ostensibly.
 
Back
Top Bottom