• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

WWII in HD

Khayembii Communique said:
I haven't watched it yet but probably will next time I see it on and I'm bored. I generally don't like the History channel for historical stuff because of the fact that it's generally told from a very American perspective, sometimes to the point of outright lies. I can't tell you how many times I've been watching something on WWII that gives the Americans most/all of the credit and the Russians little/none (to the point where they might not even mention Russia!), when the reality is that the Russians bore the brunt of the war.

It would be interesting to see a version of the story from the Russian perspective on WWII (particularly the build-up to the war and the attempts by Britain/France/USA (to a lesser extent) to "aim" the Nazi's east, but I'm not holding my breath. :)
Click to expand...

The second world war was in part an attempt to settle old scores from the first world war, much like the second Iraq war....
The shrub wanted to get the man who wanted to kill his daddy. Frontier justice demands revenge!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom