• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Vilification of Rush

Rush has weight because he wades through the Lib Media Machine on a daily basis and reveals their general ineptitude/blindness. He has fun, almost no interviews, no writers, no side kicks to chew up time like the barely paper weight Liebowitz.

I listen to Rush Limbaugh. He's indeed a gifted entertainer, and he's so talented in his delivery, that most don't even detect the sarcasm or irony in the fun that he has. He's ranted about drug users. He called Biden an arrogant windbag. He recently said that Palin was ready to be president. And, he's boasted about having 20 million listeners a week, and in the next breath, complained about 'mainstream media'. As well as many, many other similar 'ineptitude/blindness' stunts. Way to show em, Rush.
 
Last edited:
For better or for worse, but America was created by white men; and unless political correctness is not eliminated, will be destroyed by "multiculturalism" (or whatever passes for it in America).

It was created and destroyed by white men long before multiculturalism. The white man raped and pillaged his way through the East, West, and South. The Southern white male raped and enslaved the African slaves. It wasn't until equality of the "races" and "ethnic groups" became law that America finally made it's own dark racist excesses illegal.
 
nothing new just more liberal attacks...

They can't argue substance, because they just don't get substance...

If it doesn't fit into a 8 second sound bite there lost and confused!

so on it goes.. personal attacks without substance for the politically ignorant and the hopelessly liberal....

nothing new just more conservative attacks...

They can't argue substance, because they just don't get substance...

If it doesn't fit into a 8 second sound bite there lost and confused!

so on it goes.. personal attacks without substance for the politically ignorant and the hopelessly conservative......
 
It was created and destroyed by white men long before multiculturalism. The white man raped and pillaged his way through the East, West, and South. The Southern white male raped and enslaved the African slaves. It wasn't until equality of the "races" and "ethnic groups" became law that America finally made it's own dark racist excesses illegal.

But it was AMERICA.

You are talking about a process of development of American society, this process will continue for as long as American society exist, but that society was created by white males. How, -- it's a different matter; and I am sure there was more to creating America than pillaging and raping, otherwise the society would not have formed.
 
But it was AMERICA.

You are talking about a process of development of American society, this process will continue for as long as American society exist, but that society was created by white males. How, -- it's a different matter; and I am sure there was more to creating America than pillaging and raping, otherwise the society would not have formed.

Actually, you're referring to a creation process by Anglo-Saxon white males. Aside from the destruction of existing society that it entailed, it was ethnicist in nature; numerous ethnic groups that were members of the white race were discriminated against, with Irish and Italians being the most obvious examples. It's therefore misleading to refer to the "white race" as a homogenous entity, as was mentioned.
 
nothing new just more conservative attacks...

They can't argue substance, because they just don't get substance...

If it doesn't fit into a 8 second sound bite there lost and confused!

so on it goes.. personal attacks without substance for the politically ignorant and the hopelessly conservative......

More intellectual accomplishments by Ms. Henderson's Pre-K class?
 
He called Biden an arrogant windbag.
He is an arrogant windbag. I prefer Mark Levin's description of Biden... "Plugs is the dumbest man in the Senate." Now he's our adviser to Obama. The next in line. Joe foot in Mouth disease.

He recently said that Palin was ready to be president.
She is. Has vastly more experience than rev. Wright's student. And common sense, appreciation of freedom and liberty. Just a few things Obama lacks.

The Marx doesn't fall far from the pulpit. And the fruit of the Rev. Wright Marx's efforts sits in the White House.
20-years of inhaling venom.
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5YN09bAFlwY&feature=player_embedded"]YouTube - New Rev. Jeremiah Wright Video - Praising Marxism 2 of 3[/ame]

And, he's boasted about having 20 million listeners a week, and in the next breath, complained about 'mainstream media'.
You start by saying he is an entertainer, downplaying his role as a serious player in national politics. You don't get there if you have no substance.

Now, the media. These are professional journalists. Have they ...LOL.. been ...LOL... behaving ....ROTFLOL... professionally?

As well as many, many other similar 'ineptitude/blindness' stunts. Way to show em, Rush.
Such as?

Let's see... Lib press stunt dept. Like Rather's forged documents in the dying days of a presidential election? CNN playing propagandist in Iraq? How about this? FAILING to report what Rush says accurately... even though they can go back and get his transcript and/or audio to make sure they're getting the facts straight.

Sorry. Rush whoops their ass in the delivery of fact dept... and he's merely an entertainer!

LOL

.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted by Sir Loin
Whereas many here at DP would point to Stewart as an incisive political commentator and journalist. Go figure.

I would have to say Stewart is a little bit more even handed in his approach.

Sir Loin +1
 
I never listened to Rush Limbaugh's program. I only watched a speech that he made to the American Conservative Union. I thought that it was very good speech and I agreed with a lot of it. I can see how his style can p*ss a lot of people off, but he joked about his own arrogance. I think that he's more interested in just riling things up, good for ratings and he seems to enjoy it. I can see how a lot of it can be taken the wrong way though. Everyone loves to be outraged.
 
I never listened to Rush Limbaugh's program. I only watched a speech that he made to the American Conservative Union. I thought that it was very good speech and I agreed with a lot of it. I can see how his style can p*ss a lot of people off, but he joked about his own arrogance. I think that he's more interested in just riling things up, good for ratings and he seems to enjoy it. I can see how a lot of it can be taken the wrong way though. Everyone loves to be outraged.

Michael Jackson, Anna Nichol Smith, and various others have loved ratings. Charles Manson wanted them.
 
I personally like to see anyone who is willing to be himself, without apology, telling it the way he sees it, even if I disagree.
 
I personally like to see anyone who is willing to be himself, without apology, telling it the way he sees it, even if I disagree.

I do not think Rush fits that description.
 
Rush peddles fear, and 'so and so did me wrong'. All delivered with generous twists of hate.
 
Michael Jackson, Anna Nichol Smith, and various others have loved ratings. Charles Manson wanted them.

Oi vey.

And with the comment above we chose to draw the curtains, close the show, so you can savor the lingering taste of idiocy as you depart the theatre.

.
 
I think that Sir Loin hit the nail on the head. Both Stewart and Rush are first and foremost entertainers. One should always take what they say wit ha grain of salt
 
I think that Sir Loin hit the nail on the head. Both Stewart and Rush are first and foremost entertainers. One should always take what they say wit ha grain of salt
I am just really cracked up by your user name. So tell me, what does drunken asparagus urine smell like? Booze or beer, or is it booze beer and asparagus?:mrgreen:
 
I am just really cracked up by your user name. So tell me, what does drunken asparagus urine smell like? Booze or beer, or is it booze beer and asparagus?:mrgreen:

To be honest I don't know. I actually don't drink. I was thinking of a random username one day, "DrunkenAsparagus" popped into my head, and I liked it.
 
To be honest I don't know. I actually don't drink. I was thinking of a random username one day, "DrunkenAsparagus" popped into my head, and I liked it.
Perhaps you don't understand the power of asparagus!
 
Rush peddles fear, and 'so and so did me wrong'. All delivered with generous twists of hate.

Another non-listener.

1. Rush does generate fear... in libs.
2. You do not carry an audience, #1 audience in anything peddling hate.

If you want to see hate, look at Obama's peddler of it... Rev. Wright. Now Obama sat at Wright's feet for 20-years... tell me... who would you want as neighbors? People that live as Rush promotes, or would you rather Rev. Wright's proteges surround you?

3. He did me wrong? He doesn't talk about himself much, but when you get the crap pulled on you as the Media had... fomenting, disseminating falsehoods... and you have 3-hours of air time to straighten out the record... damn right you do it... and show how the other side plays their twisted games.
 
Back
Top Bottom