• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

For the Left, war without Bush is not war at all

They weren't out protesting because the war was being prosecuted poorly. They were against it in toto.

The war in Iraq, yes. We are drawing down (slowly) in Iraq. That to me is "going better".
 
I just found out over 90 million links with anti-war protests on them. A big one coming up in October. So how can there possibly not be any interest in it?

Granted if you want to go by the metric of "how many google links" there are....

There were 431 million hits for Anti War Protests 2008. More than a 4:1 jump from the time leading up to election to the point after the election.
 
Sheehan: Pro-Obama media want the anti-war movement to go away | Washington Examiner
This week ABC News anchorman Charles Gibson, who extensively covered anti-war protester Cindy Sheehan's demonstrations against George W. Bush in 2005, said "Enough already" when it comes to Sheehan's plans to protest next week at Martha's Vineyard, where President Barack Obama will be vacationing.

Now Sheehan has responded. "I am sure that he just wants me to go away like most of the rest of the anti-war movement has done under the Obama presidency," Sheehan writes at her website.

One of the things I hear quite often from people from all over the political spectrum is: “Why don’t you just go away, you’ve had your 15 minutes of fame.”

more
 
I just found out over 90 million links with anti-war protests on them. A big one coming up in October. So how can there possibly not be any interest in it?
Let me know when you've checked them all out.
 
Good thing I get to play my consistency card again: I have always said she was kinda nutty, nothing has changed now.

She's not a nut. She's a mother that lost her only child in Iraq and has been used by the Left Wing smear mchine for political purposes. Now that the Libbos got their boy in the the White House, they're ready to throw Cindy under the bus. Personally, I feel sorry for her and always have.
 
She's not a nut. She's a mother that lost her only child in Iraq and has been used by the Left Wing smear mchine for political purposes. Now that the Libbos got their boy in the the White House, they're ready to throw Cindy under the bus. Personally, I feel sorry for her and always have.

I feel sorry for her loss, not for her actions, which I find to be nutty.
 
I feel sorry for her loss, not for her actions, which I find to be nutty.

I feel sorry for her more for the way she was used by the Libbos. I knew they were going to toss her aside when she outlived her usefulness.
 
I feel sorry for her more for the way she was used by the Libbos. I knew they were going to toss her aside when she outlived her usefulness.

Most "libbos" never much cared for her I don't think. Those that did certainly did not use her, she made an ass of herself by her own actions and choices.
 
Most "libbos" never much cared for her I don't think. Those that did certainly did not use her, she made an ass of herself by her own actions and choices.

I dunno about all that. I recall alotta Libbos, especially within the MSM, touting her as a hero and having moral authority to whatever she pleased. Maureen Dowd said that Sheehan's moral authority was absolute.
 
Last edited:
Here's what Charlie Gibson had to say about her yesterday. Sounds like he's kikcing her to the curb.

It's such a sad story. Martha Raddatz [of ABC News] wrote a terrific book about one battle that took place in Iraq, and it was the battle in which Cindy's son was killed. And you look at somebody like that and you think here's somebody who's just trying to find some meaning in her son's death. And you have to be sympathetic to her. Anybody who has given a son to this country has made an enormous sacrifice, and you have to be sympathetic. But enough already.



ABC's Charles Gibson to Cindy Sheehan: Thanks for your sacrifice. Now get lost. | Washington Examiner
 
Two posts that show one of your common dishonest tactics. Show one person doing something, suggest that this is the norm for "libbos".
 
Two posts that show one of your common dishonest tactics. Show one person doing something, suggest that this is the norm for "libbos".

That's Libbo-ese for, "I'm talking out of my ass and I know it". :rofl
 
That's Libbo-ese for, "I'm talking out of my ass and I know it". :rofl

Interesting contribution apdst.

I must know however, did you feel just as sorry for her when she was denigrated so much by the right as a left wing loon more akin to a traitor than a suffering mother?

Anyway, this thread OP is ludicrous. For the simple reason that most of the left has never been against fighting the Taliban.

The right has often tried to portray the liberals as two faced on terror because of their opposition to Iraq and support for Palestinians. However, this is not the case as the left opposes religious tyranny and logically finds no problem in fighting the Taliban who have a direct hand in killing 3000 Americans in one day and destroying single handedly their own country in a few short years.
 
Interesting contribution apdst.

I must know however, did you feel just as sorry for her when she was denigrated so much by the right as a left wing loon more akin to a traitor than a suffering mother?

I felt sorry for her, but lost alotta respect for her when she got caught up in the political whirl wind; like when she went and hung out with Chavez.
 
That's Libbo-ese for, "I'm talking out of my ass and I know it". :rofl

Nooo, that's "libbo-ese" for "you have totally failed to make your point, a single example does not equate to a large percentage of people". Your frequent tactic of trying to put words into other peoples mouths is incredibly dishonest. I would be ashamed of myself for using such dishonest tactics all the time.
 
Yeah, and for ANSWER, it's never actually about war, it's about anti-capitalism.

I'm glad to hear it; we need legitimate leftists around. But anti-capitalism merely forms a component of ANSWER's progressivism, with anti-war activism forming another significant component.
 
Nooo, that's "libbo-ese" for "you have totally failed to make your point, a single example does not equate to a large percentage of people". Your frequent tactic of trying to put words into other peoples mouths is incredibly dishonest. I would be ashamed of myself for using such dishonest tactics all the time.

Let's see some links proving me wrong. Thanks in advance.
 
Let's see some links proving me wrong. Thanks in advance.

I don't need links to prove a logical error on your part. You supplied one example, and extrapolated that this represented something more than one person. If I where to, say, provide a link of a liberal acting in a different manner, it would equally fail to prove the point.
 
I don't need links to prove a logical error on your part. You supplied one example, and extrapolated that this represented something more than one person. If I where to, say, provide a link of a liberal acting in a different manner, it would equally fail to prove the point.

IOW, you can't prove yourself right, because you're talking out of your ass? Thanks for the clarification.
 
IOW, you can't prove yourself right, because you're talking out of your ass? Thanks for the clarification.

Since normal adult level English is apparently way over your head, I will slow this down and use smaller words for you.

You claimed "libbo's" used and then discarded Nancy Sheehan. To prove your point, you linked to one "libbo" doing this. This does not prove that "Libbo's" in general are doing anything. When I point this out, you tell me to prove you are wrong. Problem here is, you made the claim that us "libbo's" are doing something, so it is up to you to prove your claim.

Your dishonestly twisting peoples words is apparent to any one who reads the thread.
 
Since normal adult level English is apparently way over your head, I will slow this down and use smaller words for you.

You claimed "libbo's" used and then discarded Nancy Sheehan. To prove your point, you linked to one "libbo" doing this. This does not prove that "Libbo's" in general are doing anything. When I point this out, you tell me to prove you are wrong. Problem here is, you made the claim that us "libbo's" are doing something, so it is up to you to prove your claim.

Your dishonestly twisting peoples words is apparent to any one who reads the thread.

You're going to resort to personal attacks just because you made yourself look silly?
 
I felt sorry for her, but lost alotta respect for her when she got caught up in the political whirl wind; like when she went and hung out with Chavez.

Fair enough.

Before this Chavez incident did you give her the credit due and rage at the right's demonising of her as a traitor?
 
Back
Top Bottom