• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump calls Black Lives Matter a 'symbol of hate' as he digs in on race

If there are any known groups exhibiting hatreds, like BLM, and contributing to the Republican Party, please let me know and we'll both denounce them.

Oh come on. Don't pretend you don't already know. You do know, and you've been giving them a pass for years. You know the people wearing swastikas on their arm voted Trump. You know the people in klan hoods voted Trump. If you can't be honest, I've no particular reason to discuss anything with you.
 
One of many short-sighted Obama judgments that we’re starting to hear more about these days.

Emphasis on many in the above.
 
This is what people refuse to understand when they try to act like the civil rights movement just asked nicely. Rioting as rather unfortunate as they are is generally the last ditch effort of the unheard.

If any of them knew or even cared about history, they would see that they are behaving exactly as conservatives generally did during the Civil Right's Marches. This occurred as the great liberal/conservative shift began to move to either Democrat or Republican. What was a North/South distinction, as represented in the Civil Right's Act votes, became a Democrat/Republican distinction by the end.

- Even with Jim Crow breathing down the country's neck, conservatives dismissed the Civil Rights complaint as exaggerated and began mixing the movement in with the anti-Vietnam element as a distraction. Black people were called anti-American and were called "uppity" as conservatives talked of the "leftist" threat.

- Today, conservatives dismiss the police brutality complaint and focus on kneeling football players as simply unpatriotic. And the current demonstrations are being dismissed via a calculated effort to define the whole as just a violent riot trying to destroy history. Today, black people are called "arrogant" as conservatives talk of the "leftist" and "anarchist" threat.
 
If any of them knew or even cared about history, they would see that they are behaving exactly as conservatives generally did during the Civil Right's Marches.
We know that is a deliberate lie. The Civil Rights Marchers of the 1960s did not set COPs on fire, pull people from their vehicles and beat them within an inch of their life, or throw objects at passing vehicles. These are acts of terrorists.

Portland Riot.jpg

According to 18 U.S. Code § 2331, anyone who violates the law and puts human lives at risk for the purpose of coercing or intimidating government into changing a policy is a terrorist. That makes both BLM and ANTIFA domestic terrorist organizations, and anyone who supports them terrorist sympathizing scum. Which includes the overwhelming majority of the Democratic Party naturally.
 
BLM is a movement, and the ideals it stands for should be something all Americans support. BLM is not really a group even though it has a group of people who are part of the movement. I have no idea if anyone who is actually part of the movement is committing the crimes that we are seeing, or if there is a faction of extremists who claim to support the movement for their own gains. I also feel like Black Lives Matter members providing a lack of a response to concerns similar to your own hurts the movement because it further alienates people who already oppose the movement.

LOL yeah sure.

BLM is a "movement" the same way Marxism and Fascism are "movements".


The BLM organization has set race relations in this country back 60 years. And if any one single factor will see Donald Trump reelected it will be a push back to all the pandering the left has done toward the BLM organization.
 
LOL yeah sure.

BLM is a "movement" the same way Marxism and Fascism are "movements".


The BLM organization has set race relations in this country back 60 years. And if any one single factor will see Donald Trump reelected it will be a push back to all the pandering the left has done toward the BLM organization.

raw
 
If any of them knew or even cared about history, they would see that they are behaving exactly as conservatives generally did during the Civil Right's Marches. This occurred as the great liberal/conservative shift began to move to either Democrat or Republican. What was a North/South distinction, as represented in the Civil Right's Act votes, became a Democrat/Republican distinction by the end.

- Even with Jim Crow breathing down the country's neck, conservatives dismissed the Civil Rights complaint as exaggerated and began mixing the movement in with the anti-Vietnam element as a distraction. Black people were called anti-American and were called "uppity" as conservatives talked of the "leftist" threat.

- Today, conservatives dismiss the police brutality complaint and focus on kneeling football players as simply unpatriotic. And the current demonstrations are being dismissed via a calculated effort to define the whole as just a violent riot trying to destroy history. Today, black people are called "arrogant" as conservatives talk of the "leftist" and "anarchist" threat.

You weren't even there. The black people complaining and rioting weren't there. Every day, your group becomes more and more evangelical in your quest for power and control. Do you know how it is that Christianity started and stays afloat? I like to say that crafty old men crafted the bible. They used writings from ignorant sheep herders like your side uses Marxists writings and violence for ignorant Marxists upset with people not doing what they want the to do. They learned that killing people, cutting off hands, torturing them and none of what they would do could get them to "believe". But, what DID work was this notion of "We are all sinners and carry the original sin of Adam and Eve and we must repent and accept Jesus." When the leftists lose on the facts, they bring up the two original sins of WHITE people which are slavery and Jim Crow. Then when someone like me objects, they say we are ALL sinners (institutionalized racism) and we must repent and pay reparations. In Christianity, that would be joining Christianity in admitting guilt and shame for sinning.

Just thought I would let you know what the game is and that many on the left have been recruited just like Christians are to spread the gospel (the silly notion of original sin and that we are all still sinners). For some people such as those who have anxiety, fear. self loathing and can be easily persuaded with guilt and shame, it works. Those would be the leftists who are all about emotions and feelings and needing a cause (Christianity) in order to salve their guilt. Thus, leftism itself becomes THE cause and the game is to change the WORLD because they don't like it anymore and if they atone and admit original sin, they will be like "God:, saviors of humanity.
 
That’s exactly what your assertion comes down to, since you can’t describe anything about them. And since they can’t be described by a person trying to convince others of said existence, you must be admitting that they don’t exist after all .

I can keep your juvenile “i know you are, but what am I “ schtick going as long as you can. I eat facile sophists for snacks.

oh, i think at this point we get it. you're determined to convince people that White Supremacist supporters and sympathizers don't exist. hey, we also even know why it's your game.

;)
 


You are aware how disrespectful it is to film sacred ceremony, right? The guy could have kept the camera recording and turned it to the floor and put his finger over the microphone. If conflict happened, his excuse to continue filming, he would have been able to quickly release the microphone and move the camera back to start filming again. That video does not show hypocrisy; what it shows is someone who is ignorant of others' beliefs and religion while citing his right to film. That is twice now that you have posted something to me without understanding other people's beliefs.
 
Here's a good snapshot looking inside the minds of those opposed to protest.

EcK7Mc-WsAEq96J
 
You are aware how disrespectful it is to film sacred ceremony, right? The guy could have kept the camera recording and turned it to the floor and put his finger over the microphone. If conflict happened, his excuse to continue filming, he would have been able to quickly release the microphone and move the camera back to start filming again. That video does not show hypocrisy; what it shows is someone who is ignorant of others' beliefs and religion while citing his right to film. That is twice now that you have posted something to me without understanding other people's beliefs.
What 'sacred ceremony'? If it was so sacred they should have chosen a private venue.
 
What 'sacred ceremony'? If it was so sacred they should have chosen a private venue.
They asked the man to stop filming, which is their right. Traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expressions are protected both by state laws and under the auspices of the United Nations. Continuing to film could have resulted in a civil lawsuit. There are also some sacred traditions that are protected by copyright laws.
 
They asked the man to stop filming, which is their right. Traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expressions are protected both by state laws and under the auspices of the United Nations. Continuing to film could have resulted in a civil lawsuit. There are also some sacred traditions that are protected by copyright laws.

No, it isn't their right. As long as he is in a public place he can film and record, and there isn't a damn thing these hypocritical terrorist freaks can do about it. It's called the First Amendment, you might want to actually read it and get a clue.
 
BLM not hate
If trump wants to play whitey
he needs to wash face

You'll sleep easier now.

BLM is a domestic terrorist organization that needs to be put down with force. Your bigotry is noted, and expected from the mentally-deranged left.
 
BLM is a domestic terrorist organization that needs to be put down with force. Your bigotry is noted, and expected from the mentally-deranged left.

What force? Certainly not yours.
 
No, it isn't their right. As long as he is in a public place he can film and record, and there isn't a damn thing these hypocritical terrorist freaks can do about it. It's called the First Amendment, you might want to actually read it and get a clue.

You do realize there are limitations to the first amendment imposed by other laws and amendments? Freedom of speech, as an example, does not include the right to incite violence. It seems like you are the one who might want to read through our constitution as well as state laws to understand how our laws and rights really work, especially treaties protecting indigenous people's rights within this country.
 
They asked the man to stop filming, which is their right. Traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expressions are protected both by state laws and under the auspices of the United Nations. Continuing to film could have resulted in a civil lawsuit. There are also some sacred traditions that are protected by copyright laws.
And he refused, which is his right. What 'sacred traditions'? Copyright laws? They're copyrighted?
 
You do realize there are limitations to the first amendment imposed by other laws and amendments? Freedom of speech, as an example, does not include the right to incite violence. It seems like you are the one who might want to read through our constitution as well as state laws to understand how our laws and rights really work, especially treaties protecting indigenous people's rights within this country.
We can see the clip. The filmmaker was not inciting violence.
 
Back
Top Bottom