sanman
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2015
- Messages
- 11,994
- Reaction score
- 4,635
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Flynn’s Name Never ‘Masked’ in Call Transcripts Briefed to Obama, Records Indicate
Apparently, there is an exception allowed under FISA (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act) which lets the President directly order the wiretap transcript through the Attorney General, who has to certify that this order is aimed at monitoring communications between foreign powers only, without substantial likelihood of catching a US citizen. Since this Presidentially-ordered wiretap transcript does not require masking of names of US citizens who get picked up, then the President & Attorney General have to ensure that the name of those US citizens don't get leaked - and any decision toward disclosure requires that Senate Intelligence Committee be notified in advance of this.
So how did they determine that a phone call between Flynn and the Russians was a phone call between 2 foreign powers? Okay, the Russians are a foreign power - but Flynn??
Did Attorney General Loretta Lynch even care??
The name of Michael Flynn wasn’t masked to protect his identity in transcripts of his calls with a Russian ambassador that were distributed or revealed to President Barack Obama and a number of top officials in his administration, recently released documents indicate.
Information about the calls, including Flynn’s name, was leaked to the media within days, setting off a series of events that cost the retired Army lieutenant general his job as national security adviser, millions of dollars in legal fees, and several years of his life.
In addition, Obama administration officials made dozens of unmasking requests for intelligence reports that involved Flynn’s identity between the 2016 election day and the first days of President Donald Trump’s administration, the documents (pdf) show.
The practice of masking refers to replacing the names of Americans in foreign intelligence reports with generic standing to protect their identity. Senior officials involved in intelligence and national security have the power to request that the National Security Agency (NSA) reveal the masked names for various reasons, such as when it’s necessary to understand the intelligence.
Richard Grenell, the acting director of national intelligence, released on May 13 a list of officials who made unmasking requests between Nov. 8, 2016, and Jan. 31, 2017, that may have revealed Flynn’s identity.
There were 49 such requests, but none of them occurred between Dec. 29, 2016, and Jan. 4, 2017.
Apparently, there is an exception allowed under FISA (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act) which lets the President directly order the wiretap transcript through the Attorney General, who has to certify that this order is aimed at monitoring communications between foreign powers only, without substantial likelihood of catching a US citizen. Since this Presidentially-ordered wiretap transcript does not require masking of names of US citizens who get picked up, then the President & Attorney General have to ensure that the name of those US citizens don't get leaked - and any decision toward disclosure requires that Senate Intelligence Committee be notified in advance of this.
So how did they determine that a phone call between Flynn and the Russians was a phone call between 2 foreign powers? Okay, the Russians are a foreign power - but Flynn??
Did Attorney General Loretta Lynch even care??