• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Former US Attorney Drops Two More Names of Democrats Facing Indictments, You’ll Never Guess Who

Re: Former US Attorney Drops Two More Names of Democrats Facing Indictments, You’ll Never Guess Wh

04-26-20, 12:55 PM

This will charge up the Trump enemies. Watch how they do not mind what Schiff did to this nation.


"Former U.S. Attorney Joe diGenova has been making news lately for giving us details about the coming indictments into many of those involved in the Russian collusion hoax and Spygate.

He just revealed two more people who are in the sights of the Department of Justice, Adam Schiff and Susan Rice.

Joe diGenova told us a little about Schiff and how he’s afraid, which honestly makes sense because you saw how terrible of a job that he did with the impeachment hearings. He knew that his time was running out so his only hope was to get rid of President Trump and try and dismantle the entire investigation.

“Adam Schiff is afraid of honesty. Remember from the beginning of this entire charade he has been lying to the American people.”

“He [Schiff] has put out, literally, literally, this is important to understand, false information, knowing “that it was false.”

“Adam Schiff is really one of the most evil and disgusting human beings ever put on the face of this earth.”


Former US Attorney Drops Two More Names of Democrats Facing Indictments, You'll Never Guess Who


Well?
 
Re: Former US Attorney Drops Two More Names of Democrats Facing Indictments, You’ll Never Guess Wh

04-26-20, 12:55 PM




Well?

Look at how long it took Democrats to try to convict Trump. Give the justice department time and tell us later on how well it worked for Susan Rice and perhaps Schiff too. Schiff lied under cover of authority in Congress.
 
Re: Former US Attorney Drops Two More Names of Democrats Facing Indictments, You’ll Never Guess Wh

Parroting rabid right conspiracies and relying on the 'alternate facts' from rabid right websites isn't aware... :roll:

One more time- wrong again DiGenova is a hack, wrong in 2016 and now after a month since his crap pile got dumped in here- no indictments... :doh

Until you stop believing rabid right con men- that includes the Orange Guy- there is little constructive debate possible... :peace

Democrats by claiming Trump and Russia worked as a team to elect him were so full of crap they can't remove that stain ever. Democrats lied and lied about Trump.
 
Re: Former US Attorney Drops Two More Names of Democrats Facing Indictments, You’ll Never Guess Wh

And the wealthy would not have received their 1.4 trillion dollar gift; the tax cuts dd not help the middle class; Covid 19 would not have been the epidemic it is becoming thus saving thousands of lives, etc.

As to the impeachment hearings, Schiff did prove his case. Troubles was that McConnell declared there would be no trial, no evidence given, and no impeachment. And the Republicans acted the good little lapdogs they are, kissed trumps ass, and he walked.

As long as Democrats impose on America a system where 47 percent of the public pays nothing to support Government at the federal level, we will see tax cuts going to the taxpayers, the 53 percent of Americans. And sure due to the massive taxes imposed on the rich, by percentages it will benefit those payers more. But that is not the fault of the rich. It is trhe fault of this system of taxation.

Medicare and Social Security are nothing more than a savings program imposed on the poor to middle class. The 53 percent are so well fixed they truly do not need the funds.
 
Re: Former US Attorney Drops Two More Names of Democrats Facing Indictments, You’ll Never Guess Wh

Democrats by claiming Trump and Russia worked as a team to elect him were so full of crap they can't remove that stain ever. Democrats lied and lied about Trump.

There you go with that mindless broad brush of yours trying to deflect from your own OP... :roll:

What happened to Wrong Again DiGenova's claims about indictments??? The excuse can't be 'deep state' as the DOJ is conservative partisan... :doh

Try sticking to the topic YOU BROUGHT IN HERE....

Now if it's stains you worry about tRump was so **** stained the White House it will take two Democrat terms to get the color back from crap brown to a light beige... :doh
 
Re: Former US Attorney Drops Two More Names of Democrats Facing Indictments, You’ll Never Guess Wh

So we are just supposed to take your word for it?

You were certainly willing to take Schiffty'd word, and humbolt seems to have much more veracity than the pencil-necked douche.
 
Re: Former US Attorney Drops Two More Names of Democrats Facing Indictments, You’ll Never Guess Wh

There you go with that mindless broad brush of yours trying to deflect from your own OP... :roll:

What happened to Wrong Again DiGenova's claims about indictments??? The excuse can't be 'deep state' as the DOJ is conservative partisan... :doh

Try sticking to the topic YOU BROUGHT IN HERE....

Now if it's stains you worry about tRump was so **** stained the White House it will take two Democrat terms to get the color back from crap brown to a light beige... :doh

I deflected to some Democrats claim is all I did.

Trump is an awesome good president. Best since Reagan.
 
Re: Former US Attorney Drops Two More Names of Democrats Facing Indictments, You’ll Never Guess Wh

As long as Democrats impose on America a system where 47 percent of the public pays nothing to support Government at the federal level, we will see tax cuts going to the taxpayers, the 53 percent of Americans. And sure due to the massive taxes imposed on the rich, by percentages it will benefit those payers more. But that is not the fault of the rich. It is trhe fault of this system of taxation.

Medicare and Social Security are nothing more than a savings program imposed on the poor to middle class. The 53 percent are so well fixed they truly do not need the funds.

The latest tax cuts did not affect the 53% you are speaking of. And as long as 3 people own as much wealth as the lower 50% of the people, and are allowed to pay less then a living wage, then you just keep going in that direction, and see where it gets you.

Do yourself a favor and look at how many of the 1% pay no taxes. But you don't apply the same standard to them as you do the fictitious 47%.
 
Re: Former US Attorney Drops Two More Names of Democrats Facing Indictments, You’ll Never Guess Wh

The latest tax cuts did not affect the 53% you are speaking of. And as long as 3 people own as much wealth as the lower 50% of the people, and are allowed to pay less then a living wage, then you just keep going in that direction, and see where it gets you.

Do yourself a favor and look at how many of the 1% pay no taxes. But you don't apply the same standard to them as you do the fictitious 47%.

No the 47 percent is real alright. And the 53 percent pay all of the taxes for operating the Government. And the tax cuts did affect the 53 percent. As to ownership, do you count for the very rich that their bulk of wealth is tied up in stocks, bonds and real property? I have no clue why we lower earners are so jealous of the very rich. It is a waste of time.
 
Re: Former US Attorney Drops Two More Names of Democrats Facing Indictments, You’ll Never Guess Wh

I deflected to some Democrats claim is all I did. Trump is an awesome good president. Best since Reagan.

Well at least we agree you are trying to avoid admitting one more rabid right ranter lied. DeGenova is a serial liar but some seem to believe his every word... one born every minute I suppose.

Do you have an update on the indictments that are supposedly on the way or are 'we' using the tRump playbook of telling a lie and when it proves untrue just move onto yet another lie and pretend they are true as long as the tRumpers never admit it is a string of lies... :roll:

I think history will prove you to be in the minority for both Presidents. One thing I guess they both were the best at is selling cow pies as chocolate cake and getting the rabid right to buy in. Reagan was better, a trained actor good at reading scripts and delivering them well. Both reeked havoc with our federal government and YUGE deficits which doesn't seem to matter when Republicant is in office.... :doh

As far as tRump and the Russian connection goes tRump has hidden much of his staff and himself behind executive privilege. Considering he held one on one meetings with Putin without any record the shadow of doubt is there. Let's not forget he called for more WikiLeaks dumps even after the Intelligence Community told us all the Russians were Wiki's source... he certainly didn't decry the Russian spammers putting out false information about Hillary- Pizzagate- but doubled down claiming the Russians were helping Hillary... :shock:

If there is no issues with tRump and the Russians why is he blocking release of the COMPLETE Mueller report to Congress- a supposed co-equal branch????

Time will tell... :peace
 
Re: Former US Attorney Drops Two More Names of Democrats Facing Indictments, You’ll Never Guess Wh

No the 47 percent is real alright. And the 53 percent pay all of the taxes for operating the Government. And the tax cuts did affect the 53 percent. As to ownership, do you count for the very rich that their bulk of wealth is tied up in stocks, bonds and real property? I have no clue why we lower earners are so jealous of the very rich. It is a waste of time.

More stats that don't give the complete story... :roll:

It isn't how many pay 'all the taxes' it's the amount of money the government spends and the amount they take in. Cutting taxes is the go-to for the Republicants. Economy is doing poorly- cut taxes, economy is booming- cut taxes. Eventually saner folks need to admit there needs to be a certain level of federal income if we want a military equal to the other top 13 nations and a social safety net.... :doh

Owning stocks, bonds and real property is 'tying up' your wealth- it gains value- owning a building doesn't tie up your wealth. You gain wealth through renters. Owning stocks is also a good tax dodge- capital gains are taxed at a lower rate than income. No Sir, the game is rigged and me getting a few dollars off my taxes is a poor bribe to allow billionaires millions in tax reductions when the health of our government is at stake...

I'm not jealous of the very rich- no more than I am of an insider trader using his friends to make a fortune. Super Pacs rely on uber riche for massive war chests to win elections- the uber riche have great expectations for the money they spend.... :peace
 
Re: Former US Attorney Drops Two More Names of Democrats Facing Indictments, You’ll Never Guess Wh

More stats that don't give the complete story... :roll:

It isn't how many pay 'all the taxes' it's the amount of money the government spends and the amount they take in. Cutting taxes is the go-to for the Republicants. Economy is doing poorly- cut taxes, economy is booming- cut taxes. Eventually saner folks need to admit there needs to be a certain level of federal income if we want a military equal to the other top 13 nations and a social safety net.... :doh

Owning stocks, bonds and real property is 'tying up' your wealth- it gains value- owning a building doesn't tie up your wealth. You gain wealth through renters. Owning stocks is also a good tax dodge- capital gains are taxed at a lower rate than income. No Sir, the game is rigged and me getting a few dollars off my taxes is a poor bribe to allow billionaires millions in tax reductions when the health of our government is at stake...

I'm not jealous of the very rich- no more than I am of an insider trader using his friends to make a fortune. Super Pacs rely on uber riche for massive war chests to win elections- the uber riche have great expectations for the money they spend.... :peace

The difference in our outlooks is you care a lot about the wealth of the rich. I don't care one bit.

As to putting the Feds first, not me. I put family and even friends above government. I am not anti Government at all, but feel no need to supply all it wants vs keeping what I want.
 
Re: Former US Attorney Drops Two More Names of Democrats Facing Indictments, You’ll Never Guess Wh

Well at least we agree you are trying to avoid admitting one more rabid right ranter lied. DeGenova is a serial liar but some seem to believe his every word... one born every minute I suppose.

Do you have an update on the indictments that are supposedly on the way or are 'we' using the tRump playbook of telling a lie and when it proves untrue just move onto yet another lie and pretend they are true as long as the tRumpers never admit it is a string of lies... :roll:

I think history will prove you to be in the minority for both Presidents. One thing I guess they both were the best at is selling cow pies as chocolate cake and getting the rabid right to buy in. Reagan was better, a trained actor good at reading scripts and delivering them well. Both reeked havoc with our federal government and YUGE deficits which doesn't seem to matter when Republicant is in office.... :doh

As far as tRump and the Russian connection goes tRump has hidden much of his staff and himself behind executive privilege. Considering he held one on one meetings with Putin without any record the shadow of doubt is there. Let's not forget he called for more WikiLeaks dumps even after the Intelligence Community told us all the Russians were Wiki's source... he certainly didn't decry the Russian spammers putting out false information about Hillary- Pizzagate- but doubled down claiming the Russians were helping Hillary... :shock:

If there is no issues with tRump and the Russians why is he blocking release of the COMPLETE Mueller report to Congress- a supposed co-equal branch????

Time will tell... :peace

The man you rant against is a well known attorney. The Feds cleared Trump and later the whacko Democrats attempted to convict him and failed.
 
Re: Former US Attorney Drops Two More Names of Democrats Facing Indictments, You’ll Never Guess Wh

The man you rant against is a well known attorney. The Feds cleared Trump and later the whacko Democrats attempted to convict him and failed.

Oh please, tell the curious -- Which "Feds cleared Trump"?

Being "well known" does not mean well-respected in every instance.
 
Re: Former US Attorney Drops Two More Names of Democrats Facing Indictments, You’ll Never Guess Wh

Wow, can't wait for this conspiracy to bear some fruit. Hopefully obama, hillary and everyone that was ever close to the obama administration will all be in prison by the end of the week.

Yawn.
 
Re: Former US Attorney Drops Two More Names of Democrats Facing Indictments, You’ll Never Guess Wh

Oh please, tell the curious -- Which "Feds cleared Trump"?

Being "well known" does not mean well-respected in every instance.

Robert Mueller and Bob Barr cleared Trump in their official capacity.
 
Re: Former US Attorney Drops Two More Names of Democrats Facing Indictments, You’ll Never Guess Wh

The difference in our outlooks is you care a lot about the wealth of the rich. I don't care one bit. As to putting the Feds first, not me. I put family and even friends above government. I am not anti Government at all, but feel no need to supply all it wants vs keeping what I want.

Again you fail at what my outlook actually is and what I put first... :doh

I don't care that there are rich people, I DO care when the game gets rigged for them over the rest of us.

I don't put the government first nor it gets all it wants (where did I say that???) but the idiotic cut taxes during both good and bad times is ridiculous.

If our nation ran by citizens keeping what they want we'd never made it past the first year... :roll:
 
Re: Former US Attorney Drops Two More Names of Democrats Facing Indictments, You’ll Never Guess Wh

Robert Mueller and Bob Barr cleared Trump in their official capacity.

Mueller sent Barr a letter claiming he misrepresented his findings.
 
Re: Former US Attorney Drops Two More Names of Democrats Facing Indictments, You’ll Never Guess Wh

Robert Mueller and Bob Barr cleared Trump in their official capacity.

Robert Mueller did not 'clear' Trump. William Barr made some statements which are not supported by the Mueller Report.
 
Re: Former US Attorney Drops Two More Names of Democrats Facing Indictments, You’ll Never Guess Wh

Robert Mueller did not 'clear' Trump. William Barr made some statements which are not supported by the Mueller Report.

No, mueller cleared Trump. Barr as his boss confirmed it. The first part of the Mueller report flat out clears not only Trump, but the entire campaign team. Mueller put people into jail for things having nothing to do with Russia.
 
Re: Former US Attorney Drops Two More Names of Democrats Facing Indictments, You’ll Never Guess Wh

Mueller sent Barr a letter claiming he misrepresented his findings.

I read the Mueller report and on page 5 he flat out clears Trump plus all of the campaign.
 
Re: Former US Attorney Drops Two More Names of Democrats Facing Indictments, You’ll Never Guess Wh

Again you fail at what my outlook actually is and what I put first... :doh

I don't care that there are rich people, I DO care when the game gets rigged for them over the rest of us.

I don't put the government first nor it gets all it wants (where did I say that???) but the idiotic cut taxes during both good and bad times is ridiculous.

If our nation ran by citizens keeping what they want we'd never made it past the first year... :roll:

Democrats ran the show from 1933 for the vast majority of time and lord they love passing laws.

Recall who created the Boland amendment that was not lawful at all? Democrats did.
 
Re: Former US Attorney Drops Two More Names of Democrats Facing Indictments, You’ll Never Guess Wh

No, mueller cleared Trump. Barr as his boss confirmed it. The first part of the Mueller report flat out clears not only Trump, but the entire campaign team. Mueller put people into jail for things having nothing to do with Russia.

I read the Mueller report and on page 5 he flat out clears Trump plus all of the campaign.

You say you have read the Mueller Report and yet you make a false claim here.

russian contacts pg 5 Mueller.jpg

For some reason, I can't equate "did not establish" with your claim that Mueller cleared Trump. The fact that multiple Trump campaign workers erased files from their computers and phones, that Trump refused to meet with Mueller and that Trump failed to answer many of the questions that Mueller sent to Trump's attorneys should cause a rational person to wonder what actually took place in 2016.
 
Re: Former US Attorney Drops Two More Names of Democrats Facing Indictments, You’ll Never Guess Wh

Democrats ran the show from 1933 for the vast majority of time and lord they love passing laws. Recall who created the Boland amendment that was not lawful at all? Democrats did.

I seem to recall a string of Republican Presidents from 1860 to 1945. 13 GOP, 4 Dem... :roll:

Since WWII it has been a more even mix. You seem to not remember history very well...

It is interesting you see the three amendments as illegal (if fact no court ever claimed that) and seem to ignore the completely illegal circumvention of those amendments by Reagan's administration (some of his staff went to jail over it and many believe Reagan knew far more than he would admit)

Perhaps you should use a different source than Conservapedia… :peace
 
Re: Former US Attorney Drops Two More Names of Democrats Facing Indictments, You’ll Never Guess Wh

Robert Mueller and Bob Barr cleared Trump in their official capacity.

Ummmm, no. Mueller was very clear he didn't clear tRump of any wrongdoing. He was very pointed about saying if his investigation found no wrong doing they would have said so. He did find tRump engaged in multiple acts of exerting undue influence on law enforcement investigation.

Might want to recheck your sources... :peace
 
Back
Top Bottom