• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Nigerian Brothers to Testify Against Jussie Smollett

zimmer

Educating the Ignorant
Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 19, 2008
Messages
24,380
Reaction score
7,805
Location
Worldwide
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Conservative
“They really feel like their role in this now is to be honest about what they know,” she added. “They hope he can be honest about what he knows.”
Smollett was recently indicted by a special prosecutor in Chicago over his alleged hate crime hoax last year, in which the actor claimed that he was physically attacked by two men wearing MAGA hats who put a rope around his neck, poured bleach on him, and shouted racial and homophobic slurs at him, before eventually yelling, “This is MAGA country!”


After the details surrounding Smollett’s claims began to unravel, it became apparent that the actor had paid the two Nigerian brothers to stage the attack.


In a shocking move, the initial charges against Smollett were promptly dropped by Cook County State Attorney Kim Foxx, who was reported to have had close ties with former First Lady Michelle Obama, whose husband — President Barack Obama — Smollett had campaigned for.


On Tuesday, following the actor being charged with lying to police by a special prosecutor, a lawyer representing the Osundairo brothers says that the two are willing to testify — for either side — in Smollett’s trial.

Nigerian Brothers to Testify Against Jussie Smollett

Juicy Smoillett should be given the biggest sentence possible for his hate crime.

I’m sure he wishes Obama were in office so he could Trayvon him.
 
Juicy Smoillett should be given the biggest sentence possible for his hate crime.

I’m sure he wishes Obama were in office so he could Trayvon him.

Jordan Peterson often talks about "(paraphrase)When does the Left go too far, we seem to be in agreement that white supremacy is the Right going too far, but we dont seem to have any such boundary for the Left".

Maybe this is it.....I saw someone in Hollywood say the Juicy will never work in that town again.

Juicy seems to have found it!
 
Juicy Smoillett should be given the biggest sentence possible for his hate crime.

I’m sure he wishes Obama were in office so he could Trayvon him.

Wait, what?

...a lawyer representing the Osundairo brothers says that the two are willing to testify — for either side — in Smollett’s trial.

Testify for either side? In a criminal case?

Either they have evidence that a crime has been committed by the accused, or they have evidence that it was not committed by the accused.

I think someone needs to explain to both these "witnesses" AND their "lawyer" that one does not provide testimony on behalf of what appears from that statement to be "the highest bidder" in a criminal case. :no:
 
Last edited:
Wait, what?



Testify for either side? In a criminal case?

Either they have evidence that a crime has been committed by the accused, or they have evidence that it was not committed by the accused.

I think someone needs to explain to both these "witnesses" AND their "lawyer" that one does not provide testimony on behalf of what appears from that statement to be "the highest bidder" in a criminal case. :no:

They were participants and want the truth out... Juicy’s lawyers certainly will not use them as witnesses.
 
Jordan Peterson often talks about "(paraphrase)When does the Left go too far, we seem to be in agreement that white supremacy is the Right going too far, but we dont seem to have any such boundary for the Left".

Maybe this is it.....I saw someone in Hollywood say the Juicy will never work in that town again.

Juicy seems to have found it!

Yeah... Juicy certainly went too far. His story was so absurd that it was unbelievable right from the start... except for some parasitic Leftist politicians.

Someone... some people poisoned his mind. His working environment certainly didn’t help.
 
Juicy Smoillett should be given the biggest sentence possible for his hate crime.

I’m sure he wishes Obama were in office so he could Trayvon him.

These two brothers were alleged to have been paid to willingly act as co-conspirators in the hoax. One would assume that they are not being charged despite their obvious involvement in the crimes simply because their cooperation (including testimony?) with the prosecution was deemed critical to the successful prosecution of Smollett. The only difference (which I can see) between the actions ot the two brothers and Smollett was that the two brothers eventually confessed to police - we have a crazy justice system if confessing one's guilt to crime(s) means that one will not be charged with their crime(s).
 
They were participants and want the truth out... Juicy’s lawyers certainly will not use them as witnesses.

Why not? They could state that they too had willingly participated in the hoax and initially had lied to police. The defense could (try to) argue that since three people had participated in the hoax it is not justice for the state to charge only one of them.
 
9 years in prison for lying sound right. You Democrats agree, don't you?
 
The Nigerian brothers?

Oh yeah! The "MAGA hat wearing white guys" Omelette hired to fake his hate crime.
 
Posters here seem to have never received emails stating that a relative has perished in a Nigerian public transportation accident....
 
9 years in prison for lying sound right. You Democrats agree, don't you?

He lied to congress? How many witnesses did he threaten as well?
 
Wait, what?



Testify for either side? In a criminal case?

Either they have evidence that a crime has been committed by the accused, or they have evidence that it was not committed by the accused.

I think someone needs to explain to both these "witnesses" AND their "lawyer" that one does not provide testimony on behalf of what appears from that statement to be "the highest bidder" in a criminal case. :no:

They can provide testimony that can both help and hurt the defendant's case. It really doesn't matter who they testify 'for'. They are material witnesses and will be called. Witnesses answer questions for both sides.
 
He lied to congress? How many witnesses did he threaten as well?

Nah...he just lied to the police, the FBI, all of his "fans" and America. He lied about a hate crime that NEVER took place. Now, he will finally pay the price for HIS hate mongering.
 
Nah...he just lied to the police, the FBI, all of his "fans" and America. He lied about a hate crime that NEVER took place. Now, he will finally pay the price for HIS hate mongering.

Good for him.
 
Bad week again for the Dem's. Smollet and Avenatti going down. Who's next?
 
These two brothers were alleged to have been paid to willingly act as co-conspirators in the hoax. One would assume that they are not being charged despite their obvious involvement in the crimes simply because their cooperation (including testimony?) with the prosecution was deemed critical to the successful prosecution of Smollett. The only difference (which I can see) between the actions ot the two brothers and Smollett was that the two brothers eventually confessed to police - we have a crazy justice system if confessing one's guilt to crime(s) means that one will not be charged with their crime(s).

Brothers didn't commit a crime. Theatrical presentations on the sidewalk aren't illegal.
 
Juicy Smoillett should be given the biggest sentence possible for his hate crime.

I’m sure he wishes Obama were in office so he could Trayvon him.

Don't worry Trump and Butthead will come to the rescue.
 
Brothers didn't commit a crime. Theatrical presentations on the sidewalk aren't illegal.

That was true until their "act" was used to report a fake crime to police (as if they were initially unaware of the target audience), when their "act" was all over the news they could either report the "hate crime" hoax or become co-conspirators.
 
That was true until their "act" was used to report a fake crime to police (as if they were initially unaware of the target audience), when their "act" was all over the news they could either report the "hate crime" hoax or become co-conspirators.

The argument could be made. But, since the camera that Jessie thought would record the incident was broken, their performance never became a part of the crime. They aided and abetted with the purchase of clothesline rope, maybe. Id be wiling to forgive them in exchange for complete testimony as to the matter.
 
Bad week again for the Dem's. Smollet and Avenatti going down. Who's next?

Apparently Bloomie.

"throw minorities against the wall"
"Blacks and Latinos don't know how to behave in the workplace"
to a pregnant woman: "Are you gonna kill it?"
 
The argument could be made. But, since the camera that Jessie thought would record the incident was broken, their performance never became a part of the crime. They aided and abetted with the purchase of clothesline rope, maybe. Id be wiling to forgive them in exchange for complete testimony as to the matter.

That (bolded above) appeared to be what was happening prior to Foxx deciding to drop all charges.
 
Back
Top Bottom