• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Documents reveal DNC was 'intimately involved' in development of troubled Iowa caucus app

zimmer

Educating the Ignorant
Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 19, 2008
Messages
24,380
Reaction score
7,805
Location
Worldwide
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Conservative
[h=1]Documents reveal DNC was 'intimately involved' in development of troubled Iowa caucus app[/h]
WASHINGTON — While the Democratic National Committee over the past 10 days has tried to distance itself from the troubled app that threw the results of the Iowa caucuses into disarray, a copy of the contract and internal correspondence provided to Yahoo News demonstrates that national party officials had extensive oversight over the development of the technology.

Documents reveal DNC was '''intimately involved''' with Iowa caucus app

The DNC we’re intimately involved until it failed epically.

Have they defaulted to their standard BS when **** goes massively wrong, and started blaming Republicans?

This should serve as a lesson to Leftists, but it won’t... the lesson being, the less government does... the better for us all.
 
The DNC we’re intimately involved until it failed epically.

Have they defaulted to their standard BS when **** goes massively wrong, and started blaming Republicans?

This should serve as a lesson to Leftists, but it won’t... the lesson being, the less government does... the better for us all.

I smell the murder of the Iowa Caucuses mattering at the hands of the Coastal Elite Wannabe Overlords scum.

According to the Left the ends almost always justify the means remember.

Everything is fair in the drive to UTOPIA!
 
The DNC we’re intimately involved until it failed epically.

Have they defaulted to their standard BS when **** goes massively wrong, and started blaming Republicans?

This should serve as a lesson to Leftists, but it won’t... the lesson being, the less government does... the better for us all.

It should serve as a lesson to crooks on the left and right, but it won't.

I had a feeling this was the case--Hillary and others sabotaged the process so that Bernie and others could be made to look bad, just as they created the Russiagate hoax after the last round.
 
The DNC we’re intimately involved until it failed epically.

Have they defaulted to their standard BS when **** goes massively wrong, and started blaming Republicans?

This should serve as a lesson to Leftists, but it won’t... the lesson being, the less government does... the better for us all.

These are the same people who believe they can control how much it snows in Antarctica and can control the hurricane patterns.
 
These are the same people who believe they can control how much it snows in Antarctica and can control the hurricane patterns.

:lamo

That's your interpretation of AGW proponents?

:lamo

Good lord, no wonder you people vote the way you do.
 
:lamo

That's your interpretation of AGW proponents?

:lamo

Good lord, no wonder you people vote the way you do.
Are you saying these climate change activists don't believe that collectively we can group together and stop global warming?
 
Are you saying these climate change activists don't believe that collectively we can group together and stop global warming?

Are you openly admitting you have translated "stop global warming" into "control how much it snows in Antarctica and can control the hurricane patterns?"

Man, this is even worse than I thought. Again, I say, no wonder you people vote the way you do.

Let me help you out a bit here:

"Humans should minimize their impact on the climate because the results can be unpredictable and dangerous" is the stance of AGW proponents.

This is not, in any way, shape, or form, a suggestion that humans can directly command the freaking weather.
 
Are you openly admitting you have translated "stop global warming" into "control how much it snows in Antarctica and can control the hurricane patterns?"

Man, this is even worse than I thought. Again, I say, no wonder you people vote the way you do.

Let me help you out a bit here:

"Humans should minimize their impact on the climate because the results can be unpredictable and dangerous" is the stance of AGW proponents.

This is not, in any way, shape, or form, a suggestion that humans can directly command the freaking weather.
Im not the one running around yelling, save the planet and stop global warming, you guys are.
The big carbon clean-up: 2 steps to stop global warming at 1.5 degC | New Scientist
maxresdefault.jpg

The question has always been how much of the earth temperature is effected by what we humans do here on the surface. and Can our populations continue to exists in ever increasing numbers and increasing energy consumptions, maintain the same standard quality of living and stop the effects we have on the earths climate.
The answers have always been, our effects are small and we cant stop the negative effects we do have.
 
Im not the one running around yelling, save the planet and stop global warming, you guys are.
The big carbon clean-up: 2 steps to stop global warming at 1.5 degC | New Scientist

The question has always been how much of the earth temperature is effected by what we humans do here on the surface. and Can our populations continue to exists in ever increasing numbers and increasing energy consumptions, maintain the same standard quality of living and stop the effects we have on the earths climate.
The answers have always been, our effects are small and we cant stop the negative effects we do have.

Goalpost shift. Again, read carefully. These are two different statements:

1) "We can limit human influence on the climate by reducing CO2 emissions."
2) "We can command the weather by reducing CO2 emissions."

Do you agree that these are wildly different statements?
 
Goalpost shift. Again, read carefully. These are two different statements:

1) "We can limit human influence on the climate by reducing CO2 emissions."
2) "We can command the weather by reducing CO2 emissions."

Do you agree that these are wildly different statements?
It goes to the deeper point, Why do we want to limit humans influence on the climate? Can we change something from happening?
 
It goes to the deeper point, Why do we want to limit humans influence on the climate? Can we change something from happening?

Fiddling with dials we barely understand can have unpredictable and dangerous results. Until someone can convince me that we have extremely accurate understanding of all aspects of climate, my suggestion is to not mess with it.
 
This should serve as a lesson to leftists, but it won’t. The lesson being, the less government does, the better for us all.

This proves the opposite: that the government should have complete control all elections, not the political parties. The DNC and RNC are not the government. The 50 Secretaries of State are.
 
Back
Top Bottom