• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Impeachment witness jokes about Barron Trump’s name

Nobody was "attacking" Trump's son. The word Baron was used to make a constitutional point.

Moreover, for a president who calls people all kinds of names and just called Trudeau "two-faced" today and has said worse to others, he sure is sensitive. Worse are his supporters that yell outrage at this while being silent about kids being kept in cages and subjected to sexual assault.

What? The idiocy that is the hysteria about Trump not leaving office and declaring himself King? The only point that harridan had to make was what a miserable piece of work she is, by going after FLOTUS's son.
 
So predictable. :roll:

At least Pamela Karlan was making a point. That point being that Trump is not a monarch as he seems to believe he is.
 
I knew her fairly well in College-she had a crush on one of my suitemates and thus was at our suite fairly often..Her father was the Chairman or CEO of Newsweek-so she came from a very privileged background. She was an excellent student, and very bright. It is sad to see here get this bitter. She was a kind person in college. I wouldn't have predicted this sort of bitterness.

Bitter and smug are not a good combination.
I point all to Hillary as an example.
 
What? The idiocy that is the hysteria about Trump not leaving office and declaring himself King? The only point that harridan had to make was what a miserable piece of work she is, by going after FLOTUS's son.

God, you guys really are super-thin-skinned. She didn't even insult him.
 
What? The idiocy that is the hysteria about Trump not leaving office and declaring himself King? The only point that harridan had to make was what a miserable piece of work she is, by going after FLOTUS's son.

snowflake.gif
 
Where would I get a link on a logical conclusion? The GOP had one expert witness. The Dems had three. You think the GOP would have gotten more if they could?

So...your answer is no. You have no link to the claim you are making. :2wave:
 
And after his own frikkin' false persona that got him on the Forbes List. :lamo

The guy couldn't be a bigger conman.

He could be better though, if he was good he would actually be a billionaire, considering his daddy gave him just under a billion and he still could not achieve the billion mark to the good...
 
So...your answer is no. You have no link to the claim you are making. :2wave:

Nope. Just my own logical assumption. Are you going to claim there were a ton of conservative professors clamoring to defend Dear Leader in the hearing and the GOP were perfectly content with one?
 
And he was apparently the only witness the GOP could scrape up. Sad.

What's sad is that you are actually serious about the above.
 
I feel sorry for the kid. Ludicrous name..."coincidentally" exactly what Trump called himself, John Barron, when calling into TV and radio shows to report news on the sexual escapades of Trump.

Donald should apologize to Barron.


Also the name he forged on paperwork, often paying of sex workers...
 
At least Pamela Karlan was making a point. That point being that Trump is not a monarch as he seems to believe he is.

He doesn't think he's a monarch. You're repeating the leftist echo chamber's talking points.
 
An expert witness in Wednesday’s House Judiciary Committee impeachment hearing riffed on the name of the president’s teen son, Barron — drawing a swift and forceful rebuke from the Trump campaign.“Contrary to what President Trump has said, Article 2 [of the Constitution] does not give him the power to do anything he wants,” testified Pamela Karlan, a professor at Stanford Law School. “The Constitution says there can be no titles of nobility, so while the president can name his son Barron, he can’t make him a baron.”

Pamela Karlan jokes about Barron Trump's name

Attack the President's 13 year old son, while Democrat candidate Joe Biden has ranted kis 49 year old dishonorably discharged, coke-head, corrupt political, dead-beat-father Hunter is off-limits. No surprise as hypocrisy is high in the Democratic Party's play book.

Hate makes a person ignorant. President Trump's son is NOT names "Baron." Barron" is an American weekly newspaper focused on financial news and market statistics. As of 2011, the newspaper has four sections - Technology Week, Market Week, Mutual Funds and The Wrap (editorial and analysis columns). Barron's also offers an online version of its newspaper, which is part of the Wall Street Journal Digital Network.

Read more: What is Barron's? definition and meaning - BusinessDictionary.com

A baron can never become king because barons are THE lowest level of nobility that was and is of no authority, heirship or power.

Unless you live to be continuously consumed by hatred and fear, no rational person would have anything to do with the Democratic Party - the most murderous enemy the United States has ever had and still does. The Democratic Party exists for hatred, destruction and death - and always has from the very start.
It was not a good moment for her or the left. The laughter was disgraceful imo. It was a snarky mean spirited typical cheap shot thst the left likes to take at the expense of Trump and his supporters. That being said.

The woman appologized and i think people should accept it.

Secondly lets not do what the left does. Lets not mischaracterize her comment. She did not attack Baron. She used his name in her analogy but she didnt slight him in any way. She simply evoked his name for obvious reasons.

It backfired on her because it exposed her level of contempt she has toward Trump. In a way she did Trump a favor by showing her underbelly like she did. No need to exagerate it was bad enough on its own.

What i really want to see is the how the committee members reacted when she said that. If any of them smiled or laughed that could be made into a PR nightmare for them.

Im also curious how the leftwing media mob is gons cover this. Will they condemn it, excuse it, or just not cover it and pretend it never happened?

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 
Nope. Just my own logical assumption. Are you going to claim there were a ton of conservative professors clamoring to defend Dear Leader in the hearing and the GOP were perfectly content with one?

they actually had a liberal law professor who supported Hillary.
 
The Democratic Party of the past does not exist. There is no liberal party in the USA. The super rich corporations bought up the entire MSM, press, Internet and Democratic Party - turning the latter into the International Corporate Fascism Party. "Progressive" means "fascist" in real terms. You are a progressive by your message - so like the Brown Shirts of late 1930s Nazi Germany (where the Democratic Party is at now) - your primary tactical hopes will be violence, destruction and death.

That's what the Democratic Party has always been. The Party of war, violence, hate and death - mostly of Americans. American Democrats have killed more American in war than any other enemy of the United States of America as a fact. You are a progressive so predictably you want violence - literally wanting a son to murder his father for a fascist agenda. Forum rules prevent my stating what that says about you for that message.

Please seek help before you figure out how to climb a tower and work a safety at the same time!!!
 
Did you catch her apology?

Have you ever heard trump apologize?

You know like after calling the prime minister of our closest ally and trading partner "two faced"???
I appriciated the fact that she realized her joke was in poor taste and was big enough to take time out of the proceedings to issue an appology. I respect that she did that.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 
Nope. Just my own logical assumption. Are you going to claim there were a ton of conservative professors clamoring to defend Dear Leader in the hearing and the GOP were perfectly content with one?

I am not making any claims. YOU were the one claiming "he was apparently the only witness the GOP could scrape up. Sad.". I asked you for a link to verify your claim. If you are unable to do so, just say so. Its not a big deal
 
I knew her fairly well in College-she had a crush on one of my suitemates and thus was at our suite fairly often..Her father was the Chairman or CEO of Newsweek-so she came from a very privileged background. She was an excellent student, and very bright. It is sad to see here get this bitter. She was a kind person in college. I wouldn't have predicted this sort of bitterness.
I think she experienced genuine remorse after what dhe said sank in for her. I got the impression that she is a nice person just caught up in the trump hate frenzy.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 
And he was apparently the only witness the GOP could scrape up. Sad.

For much of the process the GoP has been whining that it's talking far too long, but Turley claims they're rushing to judgement too soon!
 
I do prefer my women to be intelligent.

Karlan is a lesbian so you'll strike out with her/ As I noted, that was a surprise to me because she had a major case of the hots for a suite mate of mine around 1980. I really liked her. She was nerdy cute in college and really sweet. And yes, she is very smart.
 
Back
Top Bottom