• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

WATCH: Rep. Elise Stefanik questions Amb. Yovanovitch about Burisma

You are the second challenger. Go back and read what is already there. I have no obligation to answer jack **** for you, especially a second time.

Its past time you quit harassing me.

In which post do you claim to have provided my answers?

Now if you cannot answer that with a post number - its just evasive you being you and we know what that means.
 
In which post do you claim to have provided my answers?

Now if you cannot answer that with a post number - its just evasive you being you and we know what that means.

Post 115. Which you could have found just as easily as me.
 
The Biden-Burisma theory is bunk. The Bidens had no involvement in the company's legal scandals.

His hiring by Burisma was seen as an attempt by the company to bolster its image and the perception it had strong ties to the US as the world vilified Russia for its annexation of Crimea, the Times reported.
Yoshiko M. Herrera, a professor of political science at the University of Wisconsin at Madison and an an expert on Russia and Eurasia, told The Washington Post: “I think there is a conflict of interest even if it doesn’t break any laws. It’s a big deal. It’s the vice president, who is the point person of the Obama administration’s policy on Ukraine, and his son is suddenly hired to be a director on the board of Ukraine’s largest private gas producer.”
With that said, Hunter has never been accused of wrongdoing regarding his work with Burisma.

The only use for Burisma is a catchy name (like Benghazi) that can be tied to a Democrat for political purposes and deflection. The GOP and Fox will simply keep repeating it to deflect from the president's obvious impeachable crime. In the end the phrase "What about Burisma?" leads nowhere - it is the same as shouting "Squirrel!"
 
Post 115. Which you could have found just as easily as me.

You mean 115 which contains this ?

Republicans opposed the measure in part because most of them do not think the president should be impeached.

The vote you are referring to contained what objectionable items that you find are not fair?
 
No..I gave you a link and you ignored it. And now here you being disingenuous about it.

I didn't ignore it. Are those the normal rules of the House? A good many progressives in this thread have been asserting that when they are not the normal rules, they are rules promulgated to give control of the process.
 
You mean 115 which contains this ?



The vote you are referring to contained what objectionable items that you find are not fair?

Haymarket go anklebite someone else, I am not playing 3000 questions with you, you know where to shove that Socratic method. I have outlined it with others in this thread, I am not replaying it for you just because you are too lazy to read the thread.

Again, go read the thread. Don't jump in and expect people to kowtow to your bull****.
 
Haymarket go anklebite someone else, I am not playing 3000 questions with you, you know where to shove that Socratic method. I have outlined it with others in this thread, I am not replaying it for you just because you are too lazy to read the thread.

Again, go read the thread. Don't jump in and expect people to kowtow to your bull****.

Such hate you have. It is sad that you haunt a DEBATE site when you have scorn for the mechanics of debate.
 
I didn't ignore it. Are those the normal rules of the House? A good many progressives in this thread have been asserting that when they are not the normal rules, they are rules promulgated to give control of the process.

You're still ignoring it. The link I posted was in response to your nonsense about Mifsud. I suspect you're ignoring it because it shuts your BS down and you don't have talking points to rebut it and you don't have the guts to admit you're wrong.
 
You're still ignoring it. The link I posted was in response to your nonsense about Mifsud. I suspect you're ignoring it because it shuts your BS down and you don't have talking points to rebut it and you don't have the guts to admit you're wrong.

Ahh, that. All of Mifsud's background is in Western organizations other than that one connection. I don't think anyone quite knows what his motivations and actions were based upon...yet.

Its curious that Mueller did pretty much nothing with the possible information he may have had, except to prosecute Papadopoulos with it.
 
Such hate you have. It is sad that you haunt a DEBATE site when you have scorn for the mechanics of debate.

Its amazing that someone typed something and you demanding they reproduce it because you are incapable of going back and reading it for yourself.
 
Oh Stephanie got her moment in the sun. Good for her. Unfortunately it had no substance or basis.

"boom goes the dynamite" LMAO!! :lamo

Why are you so sexist and utterly hate all women?
 
Ahh, that. All of Mifsud's background is in Western organizations other than that one connection. I don't think anyone quite knows what his motivations and actions were based upon...yet.

Its curious that Mueller did pretty much nothing with the possible information he may have had, except to prosecute Papadopoulos with it.

Speak for yourself. You're the only one here that doesn't know anything and it's easy to see why. No brain, no pain...right?

It's Papadopoulos that triggered the investigation. So to say Mueller didn't do anything with the information is...brainless.
 
Speak for yourself. You're the only one here that doesn't know anything and it's easy to see why. No brain, no pain...right?

It's Papadopoulos that triggered the investigation. So to say Mueller didn't do anything with the information is...brainless.

Where did Mifsud acquire that information several weeks ahead of anyone else, at least publicly. Why was he so intent on making sure Papadopoulos knew it? Why was he telling him? Mueller examined none of that.
 
What corruption involved Biden and his son?
He used his office, and the threat of witheld federal aid money to clobber Ukraine and get them to fire the guy who was investigating the company his son was hired at (hired solely because of who his daddy was). What do you mean, "what corruption"?????
 
Where did Mifsud acquire that information several weeks ahead of anyone else, at least publicly. Why was he so intent on making sure Papadopoulos knew it? Why was he telling him? Mueller examined none of that.

Mifsud got the information from Moscow.

Mueller report, page 139, paragraph 1:

"...In late April 2016, Papadopoulos was told by London based professor Joseph Mifsud, immediately after Mifsud's return from a trip to Moscow, that the Russian government had obtained "dirt" on candidate Clinton in the form of thousands of emails. One week later, on May 6, 2016, Papadopoulos suggested to a representative of a foreign government that the Trump campaign had received indications from the Russian government that it could assist the Campaign through the anonymous release of information that would be damaging to candidate Clinton..."​


Mifsud only became interested in Papodopoulous after he told him that he worked for the Trump campaign. Then they became good friends and met with each other often. Papo was eager to set up a meeting between Putin and Trump...and Mifsud, who had many contacts with high officials in Russia was happy to help him. During a trip to Moscow, Mifsud learned that Russians had "dirt" on the Clinton campaign in the form of thousands of emails and when he next met with Papo he asked him if he was interested. Papo was elated and couldn't wait to tell anyone who would listen...including a representative of a foreign government. You asked about motives, so there you have it.
 
He used his office, and the threat of witheld federal aid money to clobber Ukraine and get them to fire the guy who was investigating the company his son was hired at (hired solely because of who his daddy was). What do you mean, "what corruption"?????

DEBUNKED
 
Mifsud got the information from Moscow.

Mueller report, page 139, paragraph 1:

"...In late April 2016, Papadopoulos was told by London based professor Joseph Mifsud, immediately after Mifsud's return from a trip to Moscow, that the Russian government had obtained "dirt" on candidate Clinton in the form of thousands of emails. One week later, on May 6, 2016, Papadopoulos suggested to a representative of a foreign government that the Trump campaign had received indications from the Russian government that it could assist the Campaign through the anonymous release of information that would be damaging to candidate Clinton..."​


Mifsud only became interested in Papodopoulous after he told him that he worked for the Trump campaign. Then they became good friends and met with each other often. Papo was eager to set up a meeting between Putin and Trump...and Mifsud, who had many contacts with high officials in Russia was happy to help him. During a trip to Moscow, Mifsud learned that Russians had "dirt" on the Clinton campaign in the form of thousands of emails and when he next met with Papo he asked him if he was interested. Papo was elated and couldn't wait to tell anyone who would listen...including a representative of a foreign government. You asked about motives, so there you have it.

LMAO, you are actually taking Mifsud at his word. That's the most gullible thing I have ever heard.

You verify that you don't assume it.

An entirely likely motive is that Mifsud wanted that repeated and was told to state "Russia" had the emails. We don't know whether either is true, which is why Mueller should have spared some time to verify the very thing his entire case was built on.
 
Boom goes the dynamite!!! Time stamped to start at 3:23

Now to investigate Con Pop Joe, and bring **** Hunter to testify.



Everybody except for Comrade Communist Party Chairman Godadamn Schiftt knows Hunter Biden's connections to a corrupt Ukraine oligarch needs further investigation.
 
Its amazing that someone typed something and you demanding they reproduce it because you are incapable of going back and reading it for yourself.

You badly need to start your own DEBATE site where the normal mechanics of DEBATE are ignored and routinely violated in favor of POMPOUS PERSONAL PONTIFICATIONS that you prefer.
 
You badly need to start your own DEBATE site where the normal mechanics of DEBATE are ignored and routinely violated in favor of POMPOUS PERSONAL PONTIFICATIONS that you prefer.

Look, address the damn topic. Quit characterizing me peronally. Quit acting like you get to direct how conversations are conducted here, no one owes you a thing.

You are not debating, we are having a discussion, your intentional ignorance doesn't obligate me to hold your hand and feed you every piece of information again. Please read the thread and leave me alone.

Sent from my SM-S727VL using Tapatalk
 
Look, address the damn topic.

This site is about DEBATE. It says so right in the title announcing its purpose to everyone. Maybe you prefer otherwise, but that is the reality of the site.

My earlier posts were very very much about the topic. You simply resent a person - for some reason it is especially me with you - pointing out that you do not engage in actual debate.

So what is it you want to say about the tactics of Rep. Stefanik since my views were stated very clearly much earlier when I exposed her as being all empty noise and really said precious little ?
 
LMAO, you are actually taking Mifsud at his word. That's the most gullible thing I have ever heard.

You verify that you don't assume it.

An entirely likely motive is that Mifsud wanted that repeated and was told to state "Russia" had the emails. We don't know whether either is true, which is why Mueller should have spared some time to verify the very thing his entire case was built on.

Uhhh no, I'm taking Mueller at his word. :roll:
 
Everybody except for Comrade Communist Party Chairman Godadamn Schiftt knows Hunter Biden's connections to a corrupt Ukraine oligarch needs further investigation.

Ukraine doesn't think so. They've repeatedly said there isn't any evidence to investigate the Biden's...and without evidence they aren't going to open an investigation.
 
Back
Top Bottom