• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

WATCH: Rep. Elise Stefanik questions Amb. Yovanovitch about Burisma

zimmer

zimmer

Educating the Ignorant
Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 19, 2008
Messages
24,380
Reaction score
7,805
Location
Worldwide
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Conservative
Boom goes the dynamite!!! Time stamped to start at 3:23

Now to investigate Con Pop Joe, and bring **** Hunter to testify.

[video=youtube;6DsCEyQoYyk]https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=203&v=6DsCEyQoYyk&feature=emb_ logo[/video]
 
zimmer said:
Boom goes the dynamite!!! Time stamped to start at 3:23

Now to investigate Con Pop Joe, and bring **** Hunter to testify.

Click to expand...


Oh Stephanie got her moment in the sun. Good for her. Unfortunately it had no substance or basis.

"boom goes the dynamite" LMAO!! :lamo
 
HumblePi said:
Oh Stephanie got her moment in the sun. Good for her. Unfortunately it had no substance or basis.

"boom goes the dynamite" LMAO!! :lamo
Click to expand...

Actually BOOM goes Stefanik whose performance has been utterly guerrilla theater.
 
Who? Im more interested in what the hell Ghouliani is doing with the guys who were canned for enabling corruption and why Ghouliani thinks he has any business acting like he has any official role in foreign affairs.
 
zimmer said:
Boom goes the dynamite!!! Time stamped to start at 3:23

Now to investigate Con Pop Joe, and bring **** Hunter to testify.

Click to expand...

One of the few very few nuggets of information from today. How many more days of irrelevant witness testimony do the Democrats have planned?
 
zimmer said:
Boom goes the dynamite!!! Time stamped to start at 3:23

Now to investigate Con Pop Joe, and bring **** Hunter to testify.

Click to expand...


She was great!
 
Taylor said:
One of the few very few nuggets of information from today. How many more days of irrelevant witness testimony do the Democrats have planned?
Click to expand...

Stay tuned!

Democrat impeachment hoax = Most boring conspiracy theory ever foisted
 
3leftsdoo said:
Stay tuned!

Democrat impeachment hoax = Most boring conspiracy theory ever foisted
Click to expand...
Coming next week... Assistant vice undersecretary Smith testifies that she heard one of Trump's bodyguard's wife's employees say that Rudy threatened a Ukrainian Colonel with the Candlestick in the Library.
 
Taylor said:
Coming next week... Assistant vice undersecretary Smith testifies that she heard one of Trump's bodyguard's wife's employees say that Rudy threatened a Ukrainian Colonel with the Candlestick in the Library.
Click to expand...

:lamo

If only any of this were even THAT relevant/compelling!
 
At the end of the day, none of this matters. It's just a months long infomercial for the Democrats at taxpayer expense.

HumblePi said:
Oh Stephanie got her moment in the sun. Good for her. Unfortunately it had no substance or basis.

"boom goes the dynamite" LMAO!! :lamo
Click to expand...
 
bomberfox said:
Who? Im more interested in what the hell Ghouliani is doing with the guys who were canned for enabling corruption and why Ghouliani thinks he has any business acting like he has any official role in foreign affairs.
Click to expand...

deflect.png
 
HumblePi said:
Oh Stephanie got her moment in the sun. Good for her. Unfortunately it had no substance or basis.

"boom goes the dynamite" LMAO!! :lamo
Click to expand...

Really. It proves she and Obama administration were concerned about possible conflict of interest and corruption of a company Bidens son was on the board and did nothing. They cared little about corruption.
The witness testimony proved there was nothing of substance against Trump. This is a key witness?? You have to be kidding.
 
zimmer said:
Boom goes the dynamite!!! Time stamped to start at 3:23

Now to investigate Con Pop Joe, and bring **** Hunter to testify.

Click to expand...
Seems a weird thing to attack the Bidens for when Trump has more conflicts of interests than the Bidens could ever dream of.

There's never going to be an investigation on the Biden's because there is no there, there. It's not a secret that the Obama administration and western countries and IMF and WTO wanted Burisma investigated. The UK even froze the CEO's money until Ukraine prosecutor,Shokin investigated him...but he let the case go dormant, instead. So with no investigation or evidence, the UK had no choice but to release the money. That's when VP Biden stepped in to demand that Ukraine better fire their Prosecutor General if they wanted the billion dollars in aid...and so they did. But Poroshenko just hired another corrupt prosecutor, Lutsenko to replace him and he kept the case dormant, too. Now the new prosecutor under Zelensky is doing an audit of all the cases under the former prosecutors, including Burisma....but he's not investigating Biden because he has no reason to. Biden didn't break any US or Ukraine laws.


Ukraine Prosecutor General Announces Audit of Cases Including Firm Linked to Hunter Biden
 
mrdeltoid said:
She was great!
Click to expand...

She was great...until she wasn't. She lost my respect when she tried to weaponize her gender against Schiff because he made her stick to the rules like he did with everyone else. But she wasn't having it so she retaliated by tweeting that he tried to shut her up because she was a woman. She's pathetic.
 
Moot said:
Seems a weird thing to attack the Bidens for when Trump has more conflicts of interests than the Bidens could ever dream of.

There's never going to be an investigation on the Biden's because there is no there, there. It's not a secret that the Obama administration and western countries and IMF and WTO wanted Burisma investigated. The UK even froze the CEO's money until Ukraine prosecutor,Shokin investigated him...but he let the case go dormant, instead. So with no investigation or evidence, the UK had no choice but to release the money. That's when VP Biden stepped in to demand that Ukraine better fire their Prosecutor General if they wanted the billion dollars in aid...and so they did. But Poroshenko just hired another corrupt prosecutor, Lutsenko to replace him and he kept the case dormant, too. Now the new prosecutor under Zelensky is doing an audit of all the cases under the former prosecutors, including Burisma....but he's not investigating Biden because he has no reason to. Biden didn't break any US or Ukraine laws.


Ukraine Prosecutor General Announces Audit of Cases Including Firm Linked to Hunter Biden
Click to expand...

The entire pile of Democratic bull**** rests on there being no corruption involved in Biden and his son. Its not weird at all, its attacking the crux of the House's case. If there was any corruption, it doesn't matter who Biden is politically.
 
I have no idea what set her apart from Nunes or Jordan. Her role was to deflect from Trump’s actions (trump’s actions are the point of the impeachment hearings) and make everything about debunked conspiracy theories. Pretty sure that’s what every Republicans has done to date. What was so special about Stefanik pushing debunked conspiracy theories?
 
Last edited:
OpportunityCost said:
The entire pile of Democratic bull**** rests on there being no corruption involved in Biden and his son. Its not weird at all, its attacking the crux of the House's case. If there was any corruption, it doesn't matter who Biden is politically.
Click to expand...

What corruption involved Biden and his son? I know the optics look bad, but what laws did they break? I think there needs to be something more substantial to investigate them for other than conspiracy theories cooked up by Mulvaney and Giuliani for the benefit of Trump's re-election.
 
OpportunityCost said:
The entire pile of Democratic bull**** rests on there being no corruption involved in Biden and his son. Its not weird at all, its attacking the crux of the House's case. If there was any corruption, it doesn't matter who Biden is ly.
Click to expand...

Ummmm no.... :doh

The crux is the Don could care less about corruption but wanted dirt to use in an upcoming election. His cabal used political connections for financial gain, worked as agents for other governments, made illegal campaign contributions, were as corrupt as any Mob family.... but only the Bidens came up on the Don's radar, and he used strong arm tactics to try and get the current government to drum up a corruption cloud.

But the facts are there was no proof ever generated that the Bidens did anything illegal and all the Republican'ts want to do is throw poop and hope some of it sticks to someone other than the Don…. :peace
 
Cardinal said:
I have no idea what set her apart from Nunes or Jordan. Her role was to deflect from Trump’s actions...which is the point of the impeachment hearings...and make everything about debunked conspiracy theories. Pretty sure that’s what every Republicans has done to date. What was so special about Stefanik pushing debunked conspiracy theories?
Click to expand...

Don't you know...it's because she's a woman...


...“We know clearly you’re going to interrupt us throughout this hearing,” Stefanik complained within minutes of Friday’s opening gavel.

Though she was breaking committee rules with her interruptions, the outburst gave Republicans a nationally televised opening to accuse Trump nemesis and committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., of treating a woman lawmaker unfairly.

“You are gagging the young lady from New York,” said the panel’s top Republican, California Rep. Devon Nunes...."

GOP woman gets outsized role at impeachment hearing​
 
Moot said:
What corruption involved Biden and his son? I know the optics look bad, but what laws did they break? I think there needs to be something more substantial to investigate them for other than conspiracy theories cooked up by Mulvaney and Giuliani for the benefit of Trump's re-election.
Click to expand...

"the optics" lol, what a fancy word for ethical lapses. Every single democrat I come up against on this issue immediately asks what laws were broken. Ethical lapses come under impeachment considerations.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom