• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

WATCH: Rep. Elise Stefanik questions Amb. Yovanovitch about Burisma

OpportunityCost said:
I mean, it is the intercept, no one pays attention to their bull****. Very few people know what Barr did and learned in Italy. Your source in no way substantiated your claim. It again repeated what Mifsud said, that doesn't make it true.
Click to expand...

Then find another credible source. I'm tired of doing your homework for you.
 
HumblePi said:
Oh Stephanie got her moment in the sun. Good for her. Unfortunately it had no substance or basis.

"boom goes the dynamite" LMAO!! :lamo
Click to expand...

Interesting you saying there was no substance or basis when all she did was use literal quotes and reports of past actions. Which one of her references or quotes not factual? Be specific.
 
Moot said:
Then find another credible source. I'm tired of doing your homework for you.
Click to expand...

Just to be clear, you are claiming he got the information from Moscow, but you cant give me a single source that states that. Now you want me to substantiate your own claim, while I am claiming we don't know and should find out.

Don't ask questions you don't already know the answers to.
 
HumblePi said:
Oh Stephanie got her moment in the sun. Good for her. Unfortunately it had no substance or basis.

"boom goes the dynamite" LMAO!! :lamo
Click to expand...

Only because you don't realize whom she was talking to (millions of Americans). ;)
 
marke said:
Americans should not want guilty people to go unchallenged and/or unpunished and innocent people needlessly investigated for years looking for some crime to nail them with.
Click to expand...


Really, and did you have that same opinion when Gowdy spent years investigating Clinton because she used her own blackberry only to be found innocent?
 
Moot said:
Really, and did you have that same opinion when Gowdy spent years investigating Clinton because she used her own blackberry only to be found innocent?
Click to expand...

Hillatry was not "found" innocent. She was declared "not cuplable" for her known crimes for which Comey unilaterally declared she would not be prosecuted because, in Comey's unsolicited and illegal opinion, "she did not really mean any harm by violating those laws."
 
OpportunityCost said:
No. They are allowing one minority member to ask questions. He is not allowed to yield any of his time. This is all new. I don't know why you aren't understanding this.
Click to expand...

Life is tough.
 
zimmer said:
Boom goes the dynamite!!! Time stamped to start at 3:23

Now to investigate Con Pop Joe, and bring **** Hunter to testify.

Click to expand...


Suggests further investigation of Biden perhaps. Proves nothing with respect to the charges against Trump. What’s her point?
 
marke said:
Hillatry was not "found" innocent. She was declared "not cuplable" for her known crimes for which Comey unilaterally declared she would not be prosecuted because, in Comey's unsolicited and illegal opinion, "she did not really mean any harm by violating those laws."
Click to expand...

That's right, she didn't have mens rea. But Trump does and Schiff proved it in his closing statement at the end of Sondland's hearing. And guess what...it's in the transcript. Who knew?
 
Nickyjo said:
Suggests further investigation of Biden perhaps. Proves nothing with respect to the charges against Trump. What’s her point?
Click to expand...

That there was possible corruption under Biden, that the Ambassador testified previously she didn't know about any potential corruption issues. Because the Obama team prepped her on how to answer questions directly regarding corruption and Hunter Biden working in Ukraine at Burisma.

Demonstrates unreliability as a witness, having possible perjured herself in earlier testimony. Demonstrates the Obama administration was worried about corruption issues. Also demonstrates the issue should have been looked into, whether Biden is a candidate or not.
 
Moot said:
That's right, she didn't have mens rea. But Trump does and Schiff proved it in his closing statement at the end of Sondland's hearing. And guess what...it's in the transcript. Who knew?
Click to expand...

How do you hide communications and destroy them at a later date and not have mens rea? If they are destroyed in a fire, maybe, but as an intentional act?
 
OpportunityCost said:
That there was possible corruption under Biden, that the Ambassador testified previously she didn't know about any potential corruption issues. Because the Obama team prepped her on how to answer questions directly regarding corruption and Hunter Biden working in Ukraine at Burisma.

Demonstrates unreliability as a witness, having possible perjured herself in earlier testimony. Demonstrates the Obama administration was worried about corruption issues. Also demonstrates the issue should have been looked into, whether Biden is a candidate or not.
Click to expand...

Yeah, there are all those indictments from the Obama era. Paranoia strikes deep.
 
OpportunityCost said:
How do you hide communications and destroy them at a later date and not have mens rea? If they are destroyed in a fire, maybe, but as an intentional act?
Click to expand...

No idea what you're talking about.
 
Nickyjo said:
Yeah, there are all those indictments from the Obama era. Paranoia strikes deep.
Click to expand...

Why would they prep their Ambassador candidate in how to handle corruption issues involving the Bidens? Excusing that, she testified she never heard of any link of corruption involving Biden....yet she was prepped to answer questions regarding exactly that.
 
OpportunityCost said:
Why would they prep their Ambassador candidate in how to handle corruption issues involving the Bidens? Excusing that, she testified she never heard of any link of corruption involving Biden....yet she was prepped to answer questions regarding exactly that.
Click to expand...

... Huh?
 
Moot said:
That's right, she didn't have mens rea. But Trump does and Schiff proved it in his closing statement at the end of Sondland's hearing. And guess what...it's in the transcript. Who knew?
Click to expand...

That's what the stupid democrats keep saying, that Mueller found evidence of Trump's guilt he was powerless to do anything about. Right. Sure thing. Comey also found evidence of Hillary's guilt and said so, but then went out on an unauthorized limb and declared that appropriate justice department officials would not be prosecuting her for her violations because he (Comey) decided on his own that she didn't really mean any harm. What a crooked bozo. Trump was right to get rid of the sleazeball who wickedly justified the guilty Hillary and condemned the innocent Flynn and Trump.
 
marke said:
That's what the stupid democrats keep saying, that Mueller found evidence of Trump's guilt he was powerless to do anything about. Right. Sure thing. Comey also found evidence of Hillary's guilt and said so, but then went out on an unauthorized limb and declared that appropriate justice department officials would not be prosecuting her for her violations because he (Comey) decided on his own that she didn't really mean any harm. What a crooked bozo. Trump was right to get rid of the sleazeball who wickedly justified the guilty Hillary and condemned the innocent Flynn and Trump.
Click to expand...

I think both sides can agree that Comey deserved to be fired.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom